Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr-8zBt4xU0[/youtube]

JohnStOnge wrote:You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr-8zBt4xU0[/youtube]

I'm glad you posted this before BDK embarrassed himself.

JohnStOnge wrote:You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

Hmmmm kinda like the Donks looking stupid and trying to make something out of nothing regarding Romney's "binders" comment?

Baldy wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

Hmmmm kinda like the Donks looking stupid and trying to make something out of nothing regarding Romney's "binders" comment?

Huge difference.

Binders - a funny joke that no one really thinks Romney meant that way.
Not Optimal - a serious attempt to discredit a candidate.

danefan wrote:

Baldy wrote: Hmmmm kinda like the Donks looking stupid and trying to make something out of nothing regarding Romney's "binders" comment?

Huge difference.

Binders - a funny joke that no one really thinks Romney meant that way.
Not Optimal - a serious attempt to discredit a candidate.

Exactly. A better comparison would have been the 47% comment.

danefan wrote:

Baldy wrote: Hmmmm kinda like the Donks looking stupid and trying to make something out of nothing regarding Romney's "binders" comment?

Huge difference.

Binders - a funny joke that no one really thinks Romney meant that way.
Not Optimal - a serious attempt to discredit a candidate.

Please...
Maybe he has, but as of now I haven't heard Romney say anything about Obama's comment on the campaign trail. On the other hand, Obama and his minions have been constantly touting the binders comment at virtually every campaign stop.
Besides these people are the ones who claimed Romney was a felon and caused the death of a woman due to cancer. Gimme a break.

Baldy wrote:

danefan wrote:
Huge difference.

Binders - a funny joke that no one really thinks Romney meant that way.
Not Optimal - a serious attempt to discredit a candidate.

Please...
Maybe he has, but as of now I haven't heard Romney say anything about Obama's comment on the campaign trail. On the other hand, Obama and his minions have been constantly touting the binders comment at virtually every campaign stop.
Besides these people are the ones who claimed Romney was a felon and caused the death of a woman due to cancer. Gimme a break.

Do you think anyone is taking the binders comment seriously? Nobody took it seriously when the Dems went with the Big Bird ads (in fact, I think people thought the Dems looked stupid for doing it), and I don't think anyone thinks Romney is a felon.

The binders thing will die down over the weekend and will be forgetten after the next debate. It's not an issue that Romney needs to worry about.

JohnStOnge wrote:You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr-8zBt4xU0[/youtube]

The optimal thing would have been for your mother to swallow.

Ibanez wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:You know what I'm talking about. Everybody knows I am not an Obama fan but come on. This thing where we wait with baited breath to seize upon something someone says during conversation that can be spun into something sinister is RIDICULOUS. He just used the same word the host used when framing the question.

Yeah if he'd had PR people working on working out the best thing to say with plenty of time to think about it he'd have used a different word because they'd think about all the different ways in which people in our over sensitive society could possibly be offended. But he was just in a conversation looking like he hadn't slept for three days. Good GRIEF.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr-8zBt4xU0[/youtube]

The optimal thing would have been for your mother to swallow.

Wow, that was a dick thing to say.