Page 1 of 1

Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:56 pm
by JohnStOnge
The editorial is at http://townhall.com/columnists/thomasso ... y_in_chief" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; . Here is the incredible part (you can get the bottom line by reading just the underlined text):
Innumerable facts, however, show that it is our Commander in Chief who is Phony in Chief. A classic example was his speech to a predominantly black audience at Hampton University on June 5, 2007. That date is important, as we shall see.

In his speech -- delivered in a ghetto-style accent that Obama doesn't use anywhere except when he is addressing a black audience -- he charged the federal government with not showing the same concern for the people of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina hit as they had shown for the people of New York after the 9/11 attacks, or the people of Florida after hurricane Andrew hit.

Departing from his prepared remarks, he mentioned the Stafford Act, which requires communities receiving federal disaster relief to contribute 10 percent as much as the federal government does.

Senator Obama, as he was then, pointed out that this requirement was waived in the case of New York and Florida because the people there were considered to be "part of the American family." But the people in New Orleans -- predominantly black -- "they don't care about as much," according to Barack Obama...

Why is the date of this speech important? Because, less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined...

Unlike Jeremiah Wright's church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007 shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 Senators who voted against -- repeat, AGAINST -- the legislation which included the waiver.

When he gave that demagogic speech, in a feigned accent and style, it was world class chutzpah and a rhetorical triumph. He truly deserves the title Phony in Chief.
Now people; there's no getting around this one. The date on which he gave the speech is a matter of record. The date on which the US Sentate voted to waive the Act for New Orleans is a matter of record. Obama as a Senator voting against the bill containing the waiver is a matter of record.

Only thing I can see which could bail him out of this one is if he said something later in the speech to the effect of: "Oh yeah, they did waive the Act. But they didn't do it as quickly." Something like that.

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:14 pm
by Tod
Nobody cares. Keep digging.

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:15 pm
by AZGrizFan
Tod wrote:Nobody cares. Keep digging.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sadly Tod, you're probably right. And you're the poster child for the idiots who are taken in by him.

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:37 pm
by JohnStOnge
Tod wrote:Nobody cares. Keep digging.
I guarantee you, there are plenty of people who would care if what happened in that case were clearly articulated to them. The guy was demagoguing about the country not giving New Orleans a break with respect to that law two weeks after he'd voted against giving New Orleans a break with respect to that law.

You get what happened across to people and that's going to give them pause. At least most people.

I've said a number of times before that this guy is false. Just about everything about him is false. This is just one more example of that but it's a good one.

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:13 pm
by YoUDeeMan
Tod wrote:Idiots like me don't care. We stand by our liars and cheats because we have no self-respect and are incapable of being held responsible for our actions.
FIFY. :kisswink:

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:29 pm
by kalm
I heard GWB put a little extra "twang" in one of his Texas speeches. :thumb:

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:40 am
by houndawg
Thomas Sowell. :lol:

John where you been for the last 5 years?

Re: Phony in Chief (this is incredible)

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:51 am
by 89Hen
Tod wrote:Nobody cares. Keep digging.
You touched on the real problem. Nobody does care about real issues.