Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

We are going to be gifted with a health care plan that we are forced to purchase, and fined if we don’t, signed by a president who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke.”

BlueHen86 wrote: FoxNews

SeattleGriz wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote: FoxNews

Is that why they stomp the life out of every other cable news outlet? Because they are funny?

BlueHen86 wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:
Is that why they stomp the life out of every other cable news outlet? Because they are funny?

FoxNews

dbackjon wrote:And bitched about by people employed by the taxpayers

Col Hogan wrote:

We are going to be gifted with a health care plan that we are forced to purchase, and fined if we don’t, signed by a president who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

D1B wrote:

dbackjon wrote:And bitched about by people employed by the taxpayers

Boom!

Chizzang wrote:

Col Hogan wrote: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job

They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet

SeattleGriz wrote:

D1B wrote:
Boom!

Boom what Corky. Do you even know what the hell we are talking about?

BDKJMU wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job

They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet

How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?

BDKJMU wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job

They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet

How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?

BDKJMU wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job

They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet

How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?

Chizzang wrote:

BDKJMU wrote:
How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?

We've been over this
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan

kalm wrote:It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.

89Hen wrote:

kalm wrote:It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.

or 3) there isn't a great choice, as we've said all along.

kalm wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
We've been over this
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan

It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.

ASUG8 wrote:

kalm wrote:
It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.

If they're 50% the same but one can get more done wouldn't you vote for them? I'm no Romney fan, but I've watched the Obamadrama unfold for the last 4 yrs and he hasn't convinced me that he can get it done. With another candidate nipping at his heels he's suddenly got all new plans for his next four years....seems like if he had the answers they'd already be implemented.

kalm wrote: Ultimately I think it's the party's that lack the answers/abilities. That's why I won't vote either party.

Chizzang wrote:

BDKJMU wrote:
How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?

We've been over this
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan

Chizzang wrote: Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job

Chizzang wrote:So it sounds like Johnson won last night to me..?
Even though I didn't watch the debate - technically I couldn't - I already know these three things

1) The candidates are 85% identical
2) Obama Care and Romney Care are 85% identical
3) See points one and two

And don't believe anybody who tells you Romney was a sh!tty Governor