http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;We are going to be gifted with a health care plan that we are forced to purchase, and fined if we don’t, signed by a president who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke.”
Is that why they stomp the life out of every other cable news outlet? Because they are funny?BlueHen86 wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Is that why they stomp the life out of every other cable news outlet? Because they are funny?BlueHen86 wrote:
FoxNews Fair enough!BlueHen86 wrote:SeattleGriz wrote:
Is that why they stomp the life out of every other cable news outlet? Because they are funny?
Boom!dbackjon wrote:And bitched about by people employed by the taxpayers
Col Hogan wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;We are going to be gifted with a health care plan that we are forced to purchase, and fined if we don’t, signed by a president who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke.”
Boom what Corky. Do you even know what the hell we are talking about?D1B wrote:Boom!dbackjon wrote:And bitched about by people employed by the taxpayers
How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?Chizzang wrote:Col Hogan wrote: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job
They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet
No, he doesn't. He just wishes he was me.SeattleGriz wrote:Boom what Corky. Do you even know what the hell we are talking about?D1B wrote:
Boom!
We've been over thisBDKJMU wrote:How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?Chizzang wrote:
Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job
They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?
So if Romneycare 1300 pages, it would be okay?BDKJMU wrote:How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?Chizzang wrote:
Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job
They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?
Yes, indeed, good point on the page count. I always use double line spacing, 1.1 inch margins, 12.5 arial font and adjust the character spacing.BDKJMU wrote:How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?Chizzang wrote:
Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job
They must have left that part out of the Fox News spreadsheet
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?
It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.Chizzang wrote:We've been over thisBDKJMU wrote:
How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan
or 3) there isn't a great choice, as we've said all along.kalm wrote:It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.
Totally agree.89Hen wrote:or 3) there isn't a great choice, as we've said all along.kalm wrote:It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.
If they're 50% the same but one can get more done wouldn't you vote for them? I'm no Romney fan, but I've watched the Obamadrama unfold for the last 4 yrs and he hasn't convinced me that he can get it done. With another candidate nipping at his heels he's suddenly got all new plans for his next four years....seems like if he had the answers they'd already be implemented.kalm wrote:It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.Chizzang wrote:
We've been over this
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan
Good points. Ultimately I think it's the party's that lack the answers/abilities. That's why I won't vote either party.ASUG8 wrote:If they're 50% the same but one can get more done wouldn't you vote for them? I'm no Romney fan, but I've watched the Obamadrama unfold for the last 4 yrs and he hasn't convinced me that he can get it done. With another candidate nipping at his heels he's suddenly got all new plans for his next four years....seems like if he had the answers they'd already be implemented.kalm wrote:
It's gotta be tough for conks, knowing that 1) deep down they will be voting for someone who is politically very similar to Obama which means 2) either Obama ain't no pinkosociocommielib or they happen to be more of one than they think.
Ditto for me. I will not vote for either party of either of their dreadful candidates.kalm wrote: Ultimately I think it's the party's that lack the answers/abilities. That's why I won't vote either party.
Romney never said it was the exact same plan...Chizzang wrote:We've been over thisBDKJMU wrote:
How would you know? Did you read all 2700 pages of ObamaCare?
Was Romneycare 2700 pages?
Because Romney already said it was the same plan...
and he said: I worked closely with the president on the present National plan
Chizzang wrote: Where's the part about the guy who's single platform point is to run against this Healthcare Plan
Which is the EXACT same plan he oversaw and implemented in his last job
So wait, now you've gone from they are the exact same plan to they are 85% identical. What are you going to claim next? That they are 50% identical?Chizzang wrote:So it sounds like Johnson won last night to me..?
Even though I didn't watch the debate - technically I couldn't - I already know these three things
1) The candidates are 85% identical
2) Obama Care and Romney Care are 85% identical
3) See points one and two
And don't believe anybody who tells you Romney was a sh!tty Governor
