Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Talk about an arrogant prig. Sen. Dianne Feinstein walked out of an interview in which she was asked about her refusal to debate GOP challenger Elizabeth Emken. This is so blatant that even the uber-lib fishwrap LA Times called Feinstein out on it (though Emken did misquote the Times slightly). Yet another reason to bench Feinstein. Ugh!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09gDvV_zHHk[/youtube]

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opi ... 8573.story

SuperHornet wrote:Talk about an arrogant prig. Sen. Dianne Feinstein walked out of an interview in which she was asked about her refusal to debate GOP challenger Elizabeth Emken. This is so blatant that even the uber-lib fishwrap LA Times called Feinstein out on it (though Emken did misquote the Times slightly). Yet another reason to bench Feinstein. Ugh!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9gDvV_zHHk[/youtube]

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opi ... 8573.story

Donk acting like a conk.

Been fun watching that fuck Romney attempt damage control. What a loser.

D1B wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:Talk about an arrogant prig. Sen. Dianne Feinstein walked out of an interview in which she was asked about her refusal to debate GOP challenger Elizabeth Emken. This is so blatant that even the uber-lib fishwrap LA Times called Feinstein out on it (though Emken did misquote the Times slightly). Yet another reason to bench Feinstein. Ugh!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9gDvV_zHHk[/youtube]

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opi ... 8573.story

Donk acting like a conk.

Been fun watching that fuck Romney attempt damage control. What a loser.

Who, exactly, has Romney been doing damage control FOR? The 47% of the people he was talking about weren't going to vote for him anyway, and the 53% he WASN'T talking about agree with him.

AZGrizFan wrote:

D1B wrote:

Donk acting like a conk.

Been fun watching that fuck Romney attempt damage control. What a loser.

Who, exactly, has Romney been doing damage control FOR? The 47% of the people he was talking about weren't going to vote for him anyway, and the 53% he WASN'T talking about agree with him.

If Romney gets 53% of the popular vote I'll eat my hat...

Chizzang wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Who, exactly, has Romney been doing damage control FOR? The 47% of the people he was talking about weren't going to vote for him anyway, and the 53% he WASN'T talking about agree with him.

If Romney gets 53% of the popular vote I'll eat my hat...

Chizzang wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Who, exactly, has Romney been doing damage control FOR? The 47% of the people he was talking about weren't going to vote for him anyway, and the 53% he WASN'T talking about agree with him.

If Romney gets 53% of the popular vote I'll eat my hat...

I never said he would get 53% of the popular vote. Reading is FUNdamental.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

If Romney gets 53% of the popular vote I'll eat my hat...

I never said he would get 53% of the popular vote. Reading is FUNdamental.

So the 53% that agree with Romney will go on to vote for Obama then..?
IF I'm following your logic

Chizzang wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
I never said he would get 53% of the popular vote. Reading is FUNdamental.

So the 53% that agree with Romney will go on to vote for Obama then..?
IF I'm following your logic

Well, a certain percentage of them will. And a certain # of the 47% who pay no federal income taxes will vote for Romney. Is that REALLY that difficult to comprehend?

edit: I see what you did there.

Chizzang wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Who, exactly, has Romney been doing damage control FOR? The 47% of the people he was talking about weren't going to vote for him anyway, and the 53% he WASN'T talking about agree with him.

If Romney gets 53% of the popular vote I'll eat my hat...

Neither will get 53% of the popular vote.....

AZGrizFan wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
So the 53% that agree with Romney will go on to vote for Obama then..?
IF I'm following your logic

Well, a certain percentage of them will. And a certain # of the 47% who pay no federal income taxes will vote for Romney. Is that REALLY that difficult to comprehend?

edit: I see what you did there.

I'm just barely hanging on
It's far to complicated and intricate for me to follow completely - but - I'll struggle through

So you're saying that 47% dislike what Romney said
and that leaves (by default) 53% who then must like what he said
But this in no way effects how either percentage will actually vote

So that means you're gay then right..?
Or did I miss some other slight detail in the greater assortment of data points

Chizzang wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Well, a certain percentage of them will. And a certain # of the 47% who pay no federal income taxes will vote for Romney. Is that REALLY that difficult to comprehend?

edit: I see what you did there.

I'm just barely hanging on
It's far to complicated and intricate for me to follow completely - but - I'll struggle through

So you're saying that 47% dislike what Romney said
and that leaves (by default) 53% who then must like what he said
But this in no way effects how either percentage will actually vote

So that means you're gay then right..?
Or did I miss some other slight detail in the greater assortment of data points

Close.