Conks and Marriage
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:27 am

FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=31925


$85 (SKU OFA1520)
Designed by Grace Tsao-Wu and Laura Kofoid of Laudi Vidni. Wristlet made of 100 percent genuine leather in soft metallic sapphire with red cotton lining. Carry your credit cards, cash, ID, phone, lip gloss, and more in this easy size measuring 5'' L X 8'' W. Made in the USA
Well that depends on your definition...andy7171 wrote:Failed marriage and infidelity are conk only issues?
how so?LeadBolt wrote:Well that depends on your definition...andy7171 wrote:Failed marriage and infidelity are conk only issues?
No, but conks are the ones who act like gay marriage would destroy the sanctity of the institution, when straight people already do more than enough to accomplish that.andy7171 wrote:Failed marriage and infidelity are conk only issues?
What's to address? I know plenty of R's who don't give a hoot about gay marriage.Grizalltheway wrote:Address the point of the cartoon, Hen.
Yeah, really. You found an example of an exception to the rule, but in general it is the conks that talk about family values more than the donks. That rings hollow when you come out against gay marriage but say nothing about divorce.andy7171 wrote:Really?
http://atlantablackstar.com/2012/08/02/ ... -marriage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some conks, not all conks, but some loud conks.Grizalltheway wrote:No, but conks are the ones who act like gay marriage would destroy the sanctity of the institution, when straight people already do more than enough to accomplish that.andy7171 wrote:Failed marriage and infidelity are conk only issues?
Yup, there you have it, it's the media's fault.Gil Dobie wrote:Some conks, not all conks, but some loud conks.Grizalltheway wrote:
No, but conks are the ones who act like gay marriage would destroy the sanctity of the institution, when straight people already do more than enough to accomplish that.
There are also donks that speak about it too, mostly ignored by the media.
You mean like the Republican nominee for president?Gil Dobie wrote:Some conks, not all conks, but some loud conks.Grizalltheway wrote:
No, but conks are the ones who act like gay marriage would destroy the sanctity of the institution, when straight people already do more than enough to accomplish that.
There are also donks that speak about it too, mostly ignored by the media.
Good on ya.andy7171 wrote:I know plenty of democrat catholics who are against gay marriage. I was one of very few who didn't go sign the petition after mass last spring.
I want you to be able to get married too junior.Grizalltheway wrote:Good on ya.andy7171 wrote:I know plenty of democrat catholics who are against gay marriage. I was one of very few who didn't go sign the petition after mass last spring.
andy7171 wrote:I want you to be able to get married too junior.Grizalltheway wrote:
Good on ya.
I worry about my own marriage and keeping it going as well as possible. While I don't have a problem with gay marriage, it really isn't my battle to fight.89Hen wrote:What's to address? I know plenty of R's who don't give a hoot about gay marriage.Grizalltheway wrote:Address the point of the cartoon, Hen.
Same here.ASUG8 wrote:I worry about my own marriage and keeping it going as well as possible. While I don't have a problem with gay marriage, it really isn't my battle to fight.
That's fine, but your party has made it clear that its official position on the issue is discrimination. That's all I'm trying to get across.89Hen wrote:Same here.ASUG8 wrote:I worry about my own marriage and keeping it going as well as possible. While I don't have a problem with gay marriage, it really isn't my battle to fight.
Grizalltheway wrote:That's fine, but your party has made it clear that its official position on the issue is discrimination. That's all I'm trying to get across.89Hen wrote: Same here.
So because of that one reason, you vote Blue?Grizalltheway wrote:That's fine, but your party has made it clear that its official position on the issue is discrimination. That's all I'm trying to get across.89Hen wrote: Same here.
Show me one Liberal who doesn't use lame talking points...Chizzang wrote:Show me one Republican that admits he is stuck with a socially retarded party and I'll kiss you full on the lips![]()
War on Science
War on Women
War on Homosexuals
War on Anything that seems odd (to a mid-westerner)![]()
No. I'm not a registered member of either party.CAA Flagship wrote:So because of that one reason, you vote Blue?Grizalltheway wrote:
That's fine, but your party has made it clear that its official position on the issue is discrimination. That's all I'm trying to get across.