Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

A Monday press release from faith-based advocacy group Morality in Media celebrates the Republican Party’s platform as now targeting all forms of pornography, not just illegal child pornography. This has been a cause among the Christian conservative right for some time now.

MIM says the platform’s “new language replaces previous platform wording, which only opposed child pornography.” According to the press release, the GOP’s new wording will explicitly state that “current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced.”

“Distribution of obscene or hardcore pornography on the Internet is a violation of current federal law,” explained MIM’s President Patrick A. Trueman. “Yet, most children in America have free access to obscene pornography as soon as they learn how to use a computer. The average age of first exposure to obscene Internet pornography is now eleven.”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/gop-plat ... rnography/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

dbackjon wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

dbackjon wrote:Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

Despite being a better candidate (than Romney), a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
It's a numbers game Z and you know damn well Johnson can't win. This is a defensive voting year. Put the cock block on Barack. ( I need to coin that phrase. )

CAA Flagship wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

Despite being a better candidate (than Romney), a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
It's a numbers game Z and you know damn well Johnson can't win. This is a defensive voting year. Put the cock block on Barack. ( I need to coin that phrase. )

Not if you live in AZ or any other solidly red state.

CAA Flagship wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

Despite being a better candidate (than Romney), a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
It's a numbers game Z and you know damn well Johnson can't win. This is a defensive voting year. Put the cock block on Barack. ( I need to coin that phrase. )

Go talk to Appaholic and ASUMountaineer. Those two hillbillys are the ones who convinced me to abandon that short-termed line of thinking.

mrklean wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

They can have my porn when they pry it from my cold dead sticky fingers.

AZGrizFan wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Despite being a better candidate (than Romney), a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
It's a numbers game Z and you know damn well Johnson can't win. This is a defensive voting year. Put the cock block on Barack. ( I need to coin that phrase. )

Go talk to Appaholic and ASUMountaineer. Those two hillbillys are the ones who convinced me to abandon that short-termed line of thinking.

Good for you AZGriz. I always knew that there was hope for you.

The Republican Party needs to stop being hijacked by Big Government, Big Brother, Social/Religious Neanderthals. As soon as they take their party back and get back to basics..........I and many others will start to consider voting for their candidates.

mrklean wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

Damn where have you been you effing retard? Jon and HD need some backup.

BTW it stops with a peanut butter tennis helmet up your a$$, THAzzz where it stopz. I speak your langidge now. Wher my grape drank?

houndawg wrote:

mrklean wrote:
What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

They can have my porn when they pry it from my cold dead sticky fingers.

Jeez, guess this means Capn' won't be voting for Romney now...

So who did Gary Johnson select for a running mate? Expandspanos?

houndawg wrote:

mrklean wrote:
What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

They can have my porn when they pry it from my cold dead sticky fingers.

NO THATS FUNNY!!!!!!

mrklean wrote:

houndawg wrote:
They can have my porn when they pry it from my cold dead sticky fingers.

NO THATS FUNNY!!!!!!

YES, THAT'S FUNNIER!!

mainejeff wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:


Go talk to Appaholic and ASUMountaineer. Those two hillbillys are the ones who convinced me to abandon that short-termed line of thinking.

Good for you AZGriz. I always knew that there was hope for you.

The Republican Party needs to stop being hijacked by Big Government, Big Brother, Social/Religious Neanderthals. As soon as they take their party back and get back to basics..........I and many others will start to consider voting for their candidates.

I agree with you but I don't think we will see that happen. I really think voters need to give power to a third party.

mrklean wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

Preach on brah..... Next thing you know, they'll be trying to take away our Big Gulps, bottled water, or Happy Meals.....oh wait.

Grizalltheway wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Despite being a better candidate (than Romney), a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
It's a numbers game Z and you know damn well Johnson can't win. This is a defensive voting year. Put the cock block on Barack. ( I need to coin that phrase. )

Not if you live in AZ or any other solidly red state.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... e_map.html

I expect Johnson to do well in states in the "solidly Obama/Romney" category. He has my vote here in Delaware.

People need to understand how the Electoral college works. I get tired of random people telling me at work that I should vote for Obama because "he needs all the votes he can get".

Baldy wrote:

mrklean wrote:
What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

Preach on brah..... Next thing you know, they'll be trying to take away our Big Gulps, bottled water, or Happy Meals.....oh wait.

PREACH IT Don't touch my Guns and Porn.........................

mrklean wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Just for you, Z...

If anything, this continues the GOP’s reluctance to adopt Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels‘ social issues “truce.” Last week’s news that the platform continues the no-exceptions position on abortion and that the party is unwilling to consider even “civil unions” in their gay marriage platform shows that the party is still unwilling to revive the party’s “big tent” status and incorporate all facets of the right — including libertarians, social moderates, and Ron Paul fans who all don’t see these social “crusades” as an integral part of limited government.

In fact, many see these socially conservative positions as the antithesis of limited government.

What about Limited Government???? You can't hav it both ways. IF you take a persons porn away, then where does it stop???

Next they'll start confiscating sex toys like Roosevelt confiscated gold. Some bubba cop will come by your house and give a hard jerk to pull that dildo out of your ass.

mainejeff wrote:As soon as they take their party back and get back to basics..........I and many others will start to consider voting for their candidates.

Do you have any swampland in Florida for sale?

BlueHen86 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:In fact, it's why many conservatives with a brainstem are voting for Gary Johnson for President.

dbackjon wrote:

89Hen wrote:

mainejeff wrote:As soon as they take their party back and get back to basics..........I and many others will start to consider voting for their candidates.

Do you have any swampland in Florida for sale?

Is that your way of telling us that you are one of the Big Brother/Big Government/Social Religious Neanderthals???