Page 1 of 2

Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:33 am
by Ibanez
I recently conducted research and a working group and have come to the conclusion that JSO posts (to include threads he has started) are sub-optimal. My findings will be published next month. :coffee:

Would anyone want an autograph copy?

Spoiler: show
Autograph copy includes a rainbow bracelet

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:33 am
by kalm
I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:09 am
by CAA Flagship
Are there any pictures of girl-girl stuff in this report? Just wonderin.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:18 am
by JoltinJoe
kalm wrote:I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.
I think that the strategy of that study: to bore you into conceding defeat.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:48 am
by andy7171
Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:52 am
by Ibanez
kalm wrote:I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.
Thank you. I can't take all the credit, there were so many posters on here that contributed.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:54 am
by Ibanez
andy7171 wrote:Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?
Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:55 am
by andy7171
Ibanez wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?
Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.
When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:57 am
by Ibanez
andy7171 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.
When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Oh. Well if you buy my report you can see her on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:06 am
by kalm
andy7171 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.
When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheap skate 93hen move. :ohno:

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:27 am
by CAA Flagship
kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote: When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheap skate 93hen move. :ohno:
:tothehand: Twink Ogres need love too. ;)

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:31 am
by Ibanez
kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote: When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheap skate 93hen move. :ohno:
That's page 75. :coffee:

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:40 am
by andy7171
will someone post the tits already!?!

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:52 am
by Ibanez
andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

That's page 6.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:54 am
by grizzaholic
andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!
Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Image

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:56 am
by CAA Flagship
grizzaholic wrote:
andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!
Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Image
Is that mother-daughter action?

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:56 am
by grizzaholic
CAA Flagship wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Image
Is that mother-daughter action?
You know it.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:01 am
by CAA Flagship
Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:17 am
by Grizalltheway
CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?
Are we talking twins?

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:18 am
by Ibanez
grizzaholic wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: Is that mother-daughter action?
You know it.
:thumb: Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue. :coffee: :twocents:

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am
by Ibanez
Grizalltheway wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?
Are we talking twins?
Twin daughters or Twin Mother(mother, mothers twin sister and daughter).

Since this IS based on JSO, it's Twin Mothers and thier Twin daughters. Because incest is natural (as he states.)

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am
by CAA Flagship
Grizalltheway wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?
Are we talking twins?
They can be included in the "sisters" group. I didn't want to limit it to just twins when there are plenty of non-twin sisters out there.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am
by grizzaholic
Ibanez wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
You know it.
:thumb: Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue. :coffee: :twocents:
3 pages of photos of JBB and his gay porn collection?


And I am Grizza, Grizo is a HOF'er. :coffee:

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:22 am
by Ibanez
grizzaholic wrote:
Ibanez wrote: :thumb: Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue. :coffee: :twocents:
3 pages of photos of JBB and his gay porn collection?


And I am Grizza, Grizo is a HOF'er. :coffee:
No, JBB isn't included.

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:25 am
by CAA Flagship
Wait.......Twin Mothers with Twin Daughters? :shock:

[youtube][/youtube]