FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29924
An even better idea.danefan wrote:Can we just expand Joe and D1's PM inbox so D1 can harass Joe in private?
AZGrizFan wrote:An even better idea.danefan wrote:Can we just expand Joe and D1's PM inbox so D1 can harass Joe in private?
So you are saying there is a supreme power?Vidav wrote:I would help you out if I could. That power is above the MODS.
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:So you are saying there is a supreme power?Vidav wrote:I would help you out if I could. That power is above the MODS.
AZGrizFan wrote:PLEASE????? And move all these religion-bashing/defending threads to it and stop cluttering up the rest of the board?
Pretty please?
Pretty please with sugar on top, Mary God & Jesus?
For internal matters related to CS.com and associated sites, yes.youngterrier wrote:So Chris is God right?
Good thing there isn't a dove with an olive branch in the photo!pantherclaw wrote:So cappy gotta ask, how many times you wank it to that picture of eve, before you finally posted it?
Nah. Cappy prefers his birds dirty, like pigeons.SeattleGriz wrote:Good thing there isn't a dove with an olive branch in the photo!pantherclaw wrote:So cappy gotta ask, how many times you wank it to that picture of eve, before you finally posted it?
SeattleGriz wrote:Good thing there isn't a dove with an olive branch in the photo!pantherclaw wrote:So cappy gotta ask, how many times you wank it to that picture of eve, before you finally posted it?
Nothing but on you. Bad, BAD BL boy. Cap'n Cat wrote:BTW, see if any of you relig-o-cranks can figure this one out:
Sooo....this means you haven't figured it out?JohnStOnge wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:BTW, see if any of you relig-o-cranks can figure this one out:
That IS a good one. Of course, they're just paintings. They're not photographs.
JohnStOnge wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:BTW, see if any of you relig-o-cranks can figure this one out:
That IS a good one. Of course, they're just paintings. They're not photographs.
I think I'm in love...grizzaholic wrote: I think he meant to post this one.
Exactly, nice try Z(ero).JohnStOnge wrote:Nah. Religion cannot be separated from politics. People who think it can are kidding themselves.
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/me ... n-congress" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;WASHINGTON — Catholics make up about 28% of the members of Congress, compared to 30% when the 111th Congress began. But both figures are higher than the percentage of Catholics in the U.S. population, 24%.
Following is a list of the members of the 112th Congress who refer to themselves as Catholics.
The percentage next to them is their pro-life rating since 1997, as compiled by National Right to Life. Information prior to 1997 was unavailable at press time. They are listed from the highest pro-life rating to the lowest.
Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/me ... z1sIYY8aFe" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A Catholic political action group is targeting the 13 Democratic senators who supported the contraception mandate and is making plans to defeat those who are up for reelection in November.
"Faithful Catholics should take the opportunity to thank those Senators supporting our religious liberties," said Matt Smith, president of the Catholic Advocate, a group that encourages Catholics to be active in the political process. "It is our duty as laity to hold those who did not support our values accountable and vote our conscience when the time comes."
On Thursday, the U.S. Senate, by a vote of 51-48, defeated the effort led by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) to pass the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act as an amendment to pending legislation. The amendment would have allowed employers to opt out of the Obama administration's health care mandate – which requires coverage of contraception, abortifacients and sterilization for employees.
