Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

Dbackjon will have to tone down his thread titles also.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

What a waste of time. We've seriously come to the point in America where we are legislating against the use of the word Fuck in email intended to annoy someone?

FFS!

Hey, it's simple. Z and his Jan Brewer and Tim McVeigh crowd are trying to create their "sanitized" America. No niqqers, no "offensive" language, cheap gas, no Mexicans (who are allowed to vote). White is right!!!!

I might volunteer to be the first arrested just so the Supreme Court Case overturning this is Danefan vs. Brewer.

danefan wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.



http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

What a waste of time. We've seriously come to the point in America where we are legislating against the use of the word Fuck in email intended to annoy someone?

Kinda reminds ol' Cappy about the recent birth control shit outta the Conks.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

Meh. I've been looking for a reason to move anyways.

So I can't tell you all to fuck off?

If I open this site in Arizona, and read one of C-man's threads, is he gonna get arrested?

Our Republicans here in the state are bottom of the barrell

So I can't tell you all to fuck off?

If I open this site in Arizona, and read one of C-man's threads, is he gonna get arrested?

Our Republicans here in the state are bottom of the barrell

Ohhhh....ballsy move, Jon...posting "fuck off" twice!!!

AZGrizFan wrote:Ohhhh....ballsy move, Jon...posting "fuck off" twice!!!

That way Brewer can read one with each eye

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

Another hyperbolic screaming hissy fit from the board's resident crybaby.

The law is an AMENDED VERSION of a law already on the books enacted many years ago (prolly by a bunch of butt hurt Donks).

It is also unlawful to otherwise disturb by repeated anonymous telephone calls ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS the peace, quiet or right of privacy of any person at the place where the telephone call or calls COMMUNICATIONS were received.

If this was an amended version brought by Donks, it would be championed as a bill brought into the 21st century to protect women and children from stalkers and predators.

Baldy wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.



http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

Another hyperbolic screaming hissy fit from the board's resident crybaby.

The law is an AMENDED VERSION of a law already on the books enacted many years ago (prolly by a bunch of butt hurt Donks).

It is also unlawful to otherwise disturb by repeated anonymous telephone calls ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS the peace, quiet or right of privacy of any person at the place where the telephone call or calls COMMUNICATIONS were received.

If this was an amended version brought by Donks, it would be championed as a bill brought into the 21st century to protect women and children from stalkers and predators.

Like you....

Baldy wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Naughty words on the intenet = Class 1 Misdemeanor?

Bill has passed both houses in the legislature. Awaiting signature by Jan Brewer.



http://mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/A ... lature.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AZGrizfan is fucked.

Another hyperbolic screaming hissy fit from the board's resident crybaby.

The law is an AMENDED VERSION of a law already on the books enacted many years ago (prolly by a bunch of butt hurt Donks).

It is also unlawful to otherwise disturb by repeated anonymous telephone calls ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS the peace, quiet or right of privacy of any person at the place where the telephone call or calls COMMUNICATIONS were received.

If this was an amended version brought by Donks, it would be championed as a bill brought into the 21st century to protect women and children from stalkers and predators.

Yeah, that is why it has been withdrawn for revision....