Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

The latest from the thought police.

Gloria Allred seeks Rush Limbaugh prosecution

Rush Limbaugh has drawn the ire of celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred, who sent a letter to the Palm Beach County state attorney requesting an investigation into whether the popular radio host should be prosecuted for calling a law student a “slut” and “prostitute” last week.

“Mr. Limbaugh targeted his attack on a young law student who was simply exercised her free speech and her right to testify before congress on a very important issue to millions of American women and he vilified her. He defamed her and engaged in unwarranted, tasteless and exceptionally damaging attacks on her,” Allred told POLITICO Friday afternoon. “He needs to face the consequences of his conduct in every way that is meaningful.”

"Progressive" Donks...

So the slut and Allred have a right to free speech and Limbaugh doesn't????????

blueballs wrote:So the slut and Allred have a right to free speech and Limbaugh doesn't????????

Don't you just LOVE hypocrisy?

Yeah that's just dumb.

How f[]cking stupid are people? Rush never actually called this girl a slut...just said that if you want people to subsidize your recreational sex then you are very much comparable to one. Just an example of "progressive" activists trying to destroy people they disagree with.

as repugnant as it was - he had the right to say it - and should not be subject to the sanction of the state

(the court of public opinion on the other hand...)

Rush, like the Conkunist party:

Haven't even started showing the public about the hoax and chains

Going to be a great summer...can't wait

Barack Hussein Obama at -19 % in Rasmussen Poll
Rasmussen ^

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-four percent (44%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19 (see trends).

(Excerpt) Read more at m.rasmussenreports.com ...

Bronco wrote:Haven't even started showing the public about the hoax and chains

Going to be a great summer...can't wait

No kidding. From Scott Brown stomping Warren over the whole forcing the church to provide contraception, to CNN completely dropping the ball by letting O'brien get her ass handed to her, things are not looking good for the Donks and starting off nicely. Just need to keep the momentum.

I find it absolutely shocking how terrible Obama and the Dems have been. The media rags on Bush for 8 years and finally gets the country to elect Barack O'Carter and he pisses it away in one term. I remember the stories about how conservatism was dead when O'Carter got elected. Hmmm.

Oh, the hate from Conks. A black man succeeds and they lose their minds.

Shame.

SeattleGriz wrote:

Bronco wrote:Haven't even started showing the public about the hoax and chains

Going to be a great summer...can't wait

No kidding. From Scott Brown stomping Warren over the whole forcing the church to provide contraception, to CNN completely dropping the ball by letting O'brien get her ass handed to her, things are not looking good for the Donks and starting off nicely. Just need to keep the momentum.

I find it absolutely shocking how terrible Obama and the Dems have been. The media rags on Bush for 8 years and finally gets the country to elect Barack O'Carter and he pisses it away in one term. I remember the stories about how conservatism was dead when O'Carter got elected. Hmmm.

So precious, these uninformed Conks!! Obama in a landslide, Mort!!

Rasmussen:

"Today's numbers show Romney at 48%, Obama at 43%. That’s Romney’s largest lead since December....

If Santorum is the Republican nominee, he is up by one point over the president, 46% to 45%. This is the second time since polling began in 2011 that Santorum has had a slight lead over Obama....."

So if the election was held today Romney would beat Obama and Santorum better than 50/50 would beat him.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... cking_poll" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obama is toast.

So Rush should go to jail for using the SL-word on a professional agitator, but Bill Maher should get off scot free after throwing the TW-word on Sarah Palin?!?

That makes NO logical sense at all unless one makes the basic assumption that libs are "more equal" than conservatives.

Rasmussen: In bed with Conks. No credibility.

Four more years.

SuperHornet wrote:So Rush should go to jail for using the SL-word on a professional agitator, but Bill Maher should get off scot free after throwing the TW-word on Sarah Palin?!?

That makes NO logical sense at all unless one makes the basic assumption that libs are "more equal" than conservatives.

One thing you Conks forget is that Sandra Fluke is NOT a public figure.

Research your libel and slander law, you fvcks.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:So Rush should go to jail for using the SL-word on a professional agitator, but Bill Maher should get off scot free after throwing the TW-word on Sarah Palin?!?

That makes NO logical sense at all unless one makes the basic assumption that libs are "more equal" than conservatives.

One thing you Conks forget is that Sandra Fluke is NOT a public figure.

Research your libel and slander law, you fvcks.

Well, all they have to do is prove she is one then. I got that covered. She looks British, therefore she is a slut.

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

One thing you Conks forget is that Sandra Fluke is NOT a public figure.

Research your libel and slander law, you fvcks.

Well, all they have to do is prove she is one then. I got that covered. She looks British, therefore she is a slut.

Fuckin' Utahrd.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:So Rush should go to jail for using the SL-word on a professional agitator, but Bill Maher should get off scot free after throwing the TW-word on Sarah Palin?!?

That makes NO logical sense at all unless one makes the basic assumption that libs are "more equal" than conservatives.

One thing you Conks forget is that Sandra Fluke is NOT a public figure.

Research your libel and slander law, you fvcks.

Fluke is an activist (public figure), but that doesn't matter. The people that can put two and two together, know that O'Carter is full of shit. He is so lucky Limbaugh stepped in it, because he was getting destroyed on the topic. As posted previously, look at Scott Brown. His polling has gone through the roof since the whole Catholic church needs to bow to O'Carter debacle.

Even though the Conks don't have a solid candidate, I am feeling very positive O'Carter is going to run his Caddy off the road and lose.

SeattleGriz wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

One thing you Conks forget is that Sandra Fluke is NOT a public figure.

Research your libel and slander law, you fvcks.

Fluke is an activist (public figure), but that doesn't matter. The people that can put two and two together, know that O'Carter is full of shit. He is so lucky Limbaugh stepped in it, because he was getting destroyed on the topic. As posted previously, look at Scott Brown. His polling has gone through the roof since the whole Catholic church needs to bow to O'Carter.

Even though the Conks don't have a solid candidate, I am feeling very positive O'Carter is going to run his Caddy off the road and lose.

Man, I just registered you for a civics class at Tacoma Community College, SeaTac, so you can catch up. Come back when you have at least twelve credit hours in social studies, OK?

Cap'n Cat wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:
Fluke is an activist (public figure), but that doesn't matter. The people that can put two and two together, know that O'Carter is full of shit. He is so lucky Limbaugh stepped in it, because he was getting destroyed on the topic. As posted previously, look at Scott Brown. His polling has gone through the roof since the whole Catholic church needs to bow to O'Carter.

Even though the Conks don't have a solid candidate, I am feeling very positive O'Carter is going to run his Caddy off the road and lose.

Man, I just registered you for a civics class at Tacoma Community College, SeaTac, so you can catch up. Come back when you have at least twelve credit hours in social studies, OK?

That reply could have been so much better if you included the part where you feel sorry for my children for having to live in my household.

Always know Cap'n, that if you were a booger, I would pick you first.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Rasmussen: In bed with Conks. No credibility.

Four more years.

Rasmussen: Best election year track record of any polling organization in history. Capt in denial. 1/20/13: End Of An Error.

SeattleGriz wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:


Man, I just registered you for a civics class at Tacoma Community College, SeaTac, so you can catch up. Come back when you have at least twelve credit hours in social studies, OK?

That reply could have been so much better if you included the part where you feel sorry for my children for having to live in my household.

Always know Cap'n, that if you were a booger, I would pick you first.

No, The Cap'n pegged SeaGee as a good father years ago. You're just an ignorant Conk, that's all.

BDKJMU wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:Rasmussen: In bed with Conks. No credibility.

Four more years.

Rasmussen: Best election year track record of any polling organization in history. Capt in denial. 1/20/13: End Of An Error.

See you in November, Rovey!

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:as repugnant as it was - he had the right to say it - and should not be subject to the sanction of the state

(the court of public opinion on the other hand...)

So, is Rush more or less repugnant than Bill Maher, or David Letterman, or Louis CK?