Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

catamount man wrote:Yes, he has managed to unite the Catholic church, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, of which I am a member of, conservative Jews, conservative Orthodoxs, and the Southern Baptist Convention all because of his dumbass infringement of separation of church and state. SILLY ASS NEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!

CID1990 wrote:

catamount man wrote:Yes, he has managed to unite the Catholic church, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, of which I am a member of, conservative Jews, conservative Orthodoxs, and the Southern Baptist Convention all because of his dumbass infringement of separation of church and state. SILLY ASS NEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

CID1990 wrote:

catamount man wrote:Yes, he has managed to unite the Catholic church, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, of which I am a member of, conservative Jews, conservative Orthodoxs, and the Southern Baptist Convention all because of his dumbass infringement of separation of church and state. SILLY ASS NEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

Yeah it's always surprised me that cman's a lutheran. I was confirmed in the Lutheran Church and I don't remember it being nearly that bat-shit crazy. It was more like the catholic church minus the large cathedrals, long weddings, and pedophiles.

HI54UNI wrote:

kalm wrote:
Yeah it's always surprised me that cman's a lutheran. I was confirmed in the Lutheran Church and I don't remember it being nearly that bat-shit crazy. It was more like the catholic church minus the large cathedrals, long weddings, and pedophiles.

don't forget the kneeling.

citdog wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

Yep, it's on my to read list.

Bronco wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

CID1990 wrote:

catamount man wrote:Yes, he has managed to unite the Catholic church, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, of which I am a member of, conservative Jews, conservative Orthodoxs, and the Southern Baptist Convention all because of his dumbass infringement of separation of church and state. SILLY ASS NEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

CID1990 wrote:

catamount man wrote:Yes, he has managed to unite the Catholic church, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, of which I am a member of, conservative Jews, conservative Orthodoxs, and the Southern Baptist Convention all because of his dumbass infringement of separation of church and state. SILLY ASS NEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

93henfan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
You are a Lutheran?!?

I would have guessed Southern Baptist.

Lutheran means German and German means Nazi. At least, that's the connection SK or D would draw.

Nazi.

The MO Synod are the wackadoodle branch of the Lutherans. The ELCA's, like me, are laid back.

Wedgebuster wrote:Looks like he's united about 55% of the electorate against any GOP possible candidate, and I suspect a much higher margin than that among women voters, including Republican women voters.

I don't know if that qualifies as "great" in that sense since it has been because of the efforts of the GOP that mostly has alienated these voters.

catamount man wrote:

93henfan wrote:
The MO Synod are the wackadoodle branch of the Lutherans. The ELCA's, like me, are laid back.

No the ELCA, while professing to be Christian, deny the scriptural basis of salvation in Christ alone, support the infanticide of innocent children in the womb and ordain practicing gays as pastors. And trust me, Wisconsin-Synod are further right that we are, not that it matters. CONFESSIONAL Lutherans still have the Word of God to guide us, not the world's opinions such as ELCA. No wonder people are leaving you, the Episcopal church and PC-USA in droves.

BDKJMU wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:Looks like he's united about 55% of the electorate against any GOP possible candidate, and I suspect a much higher margin than that among women voters, including Republican women voters.

I don't know if that qualifies as "great" in that sense since it has been because of the efforts of the GOP that mostly has alienated these voters.

Wrong. Latest Rasmusen:

".....As a result, with the president’s overall approval ratings down six points since Valentine’s Day, the general election polling is looking weaker for the incumbent. It remains to be seen, of course, if this is merely statistical noise or a lasting change signaling that the president’s recent bounce in the polls has come to an end.

For the first time since late December 2011, Mitt Romney leads the president in a hypothetical 2012 matchup. Romney earns 45% of the vote, while the president attracts support from 43%. Romney holds a nine-point advantage among unaffiliated voters.

For the first time ever, Texas Congressman Ron Paul also leads the president. In that matchup, 43% prefer Paul and 41% Obama. Ten percent (10%) would vote for some other option, a figure that includes 17% of Republicans.

If former Senator Rick Santorum is the Republican nominee, the president leads by two, 45% to 43%....."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... cking_poll" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wedgebuster wrote:

BDKJMU wrote:
Wrong. Latest Rasmusen:

".....As a result, with the president’s overall approval ratings down six points since Valentine’s Day, the general election polling is looking weaker for the incumbent. It remains to be seen, of course, if this is merely statistical noise or a lasting change signaling that the president’s recent bounce in the polls has come to an end.

For the first time since late December 2011, Mitt Romney leads the president in a hypothetical 2012 matchup. Romney earns 45% of the vote, while the president attracts support from 43%. Romney holds a nine-point advantage among unaffiliated voters.

For the first time ever, Texas Congressman Ron Paul also leads the president. In that matchup, 43% prefer Paul and 41% Obama. Ten percent (10%) would vote for some other option, a figure that includes 17% of Republicans.

If former Senator Rick Santorum is the Republican nominee, the president leads by two, 45% to 43%....."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... cking_poll" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wrong, all those women aren't telling their conky husbands that they are voting for women's rights this fall.

I've seen this movie before, you start with the sticking your nose between women and their docs issues and your ass is grass on election day.

The genie is out of the bottle again, Obama is building a huge lead.

Keep up the social issues conks.