Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

SuperHornet wrote:Haley Barbour thinks that, while unlikely, another candidate may jump into the ring for the GOP nomination for President. All he's saying at the moment, though, is that it's POSSIBLE, nothing in terms of WHO.

We all know who SH thinks it will be, though!



http://news.yahoo.com/haley-barbour-tel ... -news.html

SuperHornet wrote:Haley Barbour thinks that, while unlikely, another candidate may jump into the ring for the GOP nomination for President. All he's saying at the moment, though, is that it's POSSIBLE, nothing in terms of WHO.

We all know who SH thinks it will be, though!



http://news.yahoo.com/haley-barbour-tel ... -news.html

Cap'n Cat wrote:As mentioned before, the sane, reasonable Conk candidoofs out there, if there are any, sat this one out because they KNOW they, themselves, did not have an answer for the current problems facing the nation. They'd take the same spears Barack is. Obama, for better or worse DID have that courage. And, he's succeeding. Second, they know they could never beat him. Despite rhetoric from the right, He's a solid Prez, is non-controversial, no Conk shit sticks to Him and He is actually positive, something NO Conk candidate can say.

What keeps the board Progressives goring you Conks here is the knowledge that you know in your hearts the above to be true.

Cap'n Cat hath spoken.

Long live Cap'n Cat.

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:As mentioned before, the sane, reasonable Conk candidoofs out there, if there are any, sat this one out because they KNOW they, themselves, did not have an answer for the current problems facing the nation. They'd take the same spears Barack is. Obama, for better or worse DID have that courage. And, he's succeeding. Second, they know they could never beat him. Despite rhetoric from the right, He's a solid Prez, is non-controversial, no Conk shit sticks to Him and He is actually positive, something NO Conk candidate can say.

What keeps the board Progressives goring you Conks here is the knowledge that you know in your hearts the above to be true.

Cap'n Cat hath spoken.

Long live Cap'n Cat.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:

He's doing just fine. Would you azzholes be happier with W?

kalm wrote:I think there's a good chance that either a new candidate will be drafted or you'll see a third party splinter candidacy.

Ivytalk wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:




He's doing just fine. Would you azzholes be happier with W?

As a matter of fact, yes!

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Ivytalk wrote: As a matter of fact, yes!

Of course, he's white!!

Cap'n Cat wrote:

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:

He's doing just fine. Would you azzholes be happier with W?

SuperHornet wrote:1. President Obama is about the most controversial president in history, as much as the troll brothers try to spin it otherwise.

2. Trump might just be about the worst candidate available for the GOP.

3. An independent GOP bid in the fall will probably doom the GOP to losing. There's plenty of history behind that, the Heisman trash at USC not withstanding.

4. Not only is Schwarzenegger not eligible, after his epic fail in Cali, there's no way he could hope for the nom if he were miraculously allowed in.

I don't know about intentions, but I'd be happy with Vern Clark, James Jones, or (should he retire soon) James Mattis. They'd make GREAT Commanders in Chief, unlike the "community organizer" who's a bigger flop as president than Sam Bowie and Ralph Sampson put together.

SuperHornet wrote:1. President Obama is about the most controversial president in history, as much as the troll brothers try to spin it otherwise.

2. Trump might just be about the worst candidate available for the GOP.

3. An independent GOP bid in the fall will probably doom the GOP to losing. There's plenty of history behind that, the Heisman trash at USC not withstanding.

4. Not only is Schwarzenegger not eligible, after his epic fail in Cali, there's no way he could hope for the nom if he were miraculously allowed in.

I don't know about intentions, but I'd be happy with Vern Clark, James Jones, or (should he retire soon) James Mattis. They'd make GREAT Commanders in Chief, unlike the "community organizer" who's a bigger flop as president than Sam Bowie and Ralph Sampson put together.

dbackjon wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:1. President Obama is about the most controversial president in history, as much as the troll brothers try to spin it otherwise.

2. Trump might just be about the worst candidate available for the GOP.

3. An independent GOP bid in the fall will probably doom the GOP to losing. There's plenty of history behind that, the Heisman trash at USC not withstanding.

4. Not only is Schwarzenegger not eligible, after his epic fail in Cali, there's no way he could hope for the nom if he were miraculously allowed in.

I don't know about intentions, but I'd be happy with Vern Clark, James Jones, or (should he retire soon) James Mattis. They'd make GREAT Commanders in Chief, unlike the "community organizer" who's a bigger flop as president than Sam Bowie and Ralph Sampson put together.

The reason Obama is so "controversial" is that 35% of the populace hate him solely because he is a liberal Democrat. The lack of tolerance on the far right is scary.

dbackjon wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:1. President Obama is about the most controversial president in history, as much as the troll brothers try to spin it otherwise.

2. Trump might just be about the worst candidate available for the GOP.

3. An independent GOP bid in the fall will probably doom the GOP to losing. There's plenty of history behind that, the Heisman trash at USC not withstanding.

4. Not only is Schwarzenegger not eligible, after his epic fail in Cali, there's no way he could hope for the nom if he were miraculously allowed in.

I don't know about intentions, but I'd be happy with Vern Clark, James Jones, or (should he retire soon) James Mattis. They'd make GREAT Commanders in Chief, unlike the "community organizer" who's a bigger flop as president than Sam Bowie and Ralph Sampson put together.

The reason Obama is so "controversial" is that 35% of the populace hate him solely because he is a liberal Democrat. The lack of tolerance on the far right is scary.

Ivytalk wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

The reason Obama is so "controversial" is that 35% of the populace hate him solely because he is a liberal Democrat. The lack of tolerance on the far right is scary.

Same as on the far left, dback, if you happen to support conservative views on anything. Witness the OWS thugs and some of your own posts.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Ivytalk wrote: Same as on the far left, dback, if you happen to support conservative views on anything. Witness the OWS thugs and some of your own posts.

Bullshit, IT. NOTHING will ever compare to the attacks on Obama from your friends for the rest of our nation's history, and you know it. Witness CID and BDK and some of your own posts.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Bullshit, IT. NOTHING will ever compare to the attacks on Obama from your friends for the rest of our nation's history, and you know it. Witness CID and BDK and some of your own posts.

My GOD you donk morons have short memories.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Ivytalk wrote: Same as on the far left, dback, if you happen to support conservative views on anything. Witness the OWS thugs and some of your own posts.

Bullshit, IT. NOTHING will ever compare to the attacks on Obama from your friends for the rest of our nation's history, and you know it. Witness CID and BDK and some of your own posts.

Ivytalk wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Bullshit, IT. NOTHING will ever compare to the attacks on Obama from your friends for the rest of our nation's history, and you know it. Witness CID and BDK and some of your own posts.

I fully admit that I can't stand Obama, either his cold, ruthless and arrogant personality or his unrepentantly statist policies. My alma mater is full of arrogant azzholes -- mostly, but not exclusively, overprivileged Donks -- who think they know how to fix the world, when they really have trouble tying their shoes (note Obama's preference for slip-ons). Obama can't admit a mistake and gets a free pass from the MSM and his idolaters in the left-wing blogosphere, compared to one George W. Bush. So stuff it.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Ivytalk wrote: I fully admit that I can't stand Obama, either his cold, ruthless and arrogant personality or his unrepentantly statist policies. My alma mater is full of arrogant azzholes -- mostly, but not exclusively, overprivileged Donks -- who think they know how to fix the world, when they really have trouble tying their shoes (note Obama's preference for slip-ons). Obama can't admit a mistake and gets a free pass from the MSM and his idolaters in the left-wing blogosphere, compared to one George W. Bush. So stuff it.

IT,
That's what you "gather" from radio and TV. I bet you'd like the guy if you sat and talked with him. I feel the same why about the Conks I harpoon. What you see as his arrogance, I see as him staying above the Conk-created fray. So stuff you, bitch!

Ivytalk wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

IT,
That's what you "gather" from radio and TV. I bet you'd like the guy if you sat and talked with him. I feel the same why about the Conks I harpoon. What you see as his arrogance, I see as him staying above the Conk-created fray. So stuff you, bitch!

If I sat and talked to him, I'd sock him in his Benito Mussolini glass jaw. He's a condescending elitist whose own shat don't stank. And you can't tell me otherwise, MoFo!