Page 1 of 2

today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:58 am
by catamount man
http://www.abortiontv.com/images/jh9.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Aborted via Saline Abortion at 22 weeks. Look at it you filthy libs and clap at your handiwork. Look at the burns on this small human being. I will post one a day until you criminals that condone this barbarism admit you and your culture of death are reprehensible. :evil:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:00 am
by Vidav
It's sick how you get off looking at pictures like this. :ohno:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:05 am
by catamount man
that child's blood is on YOUR hands, not mine.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:14 am
by Vidav
catamount man wrote:that child's blood is on YOUR hands, not mine.
I had nothing to do with any part of it.

You are the one that likes to post nasty pictures. Obviously you have a bit of a fetish. :coffee:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:31 am
by JoltinJoe
CM, I agree it is important to see what abortion victims look like, but calling people here "murderers" or saying that the blood is on their hands, is both counter-productive and really not true.

I do ask people here, though, how can you not oppose what you see in that picture?

The victim in this photo was aborted through the saline solution procedure. To accomplish this, the abortionist injects a salty solution directly into the amniotic sac, which of course is the source of nourishment for the growing fetus. So instead of obtaining the nourishment needed to grow,the fetus is essentially suffocated to death by the poison which has been injected into the amniotic sac. The fetus breathes in the saline solution, becomes poisoned, convulses, struggles, and then dies. This process takes over an hour before the fetus dies. The mother usually delivers the dead fetus within the next two days.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:11 am
by Skjellyfetti
JoltinJoe wrote: I do ask people here, though, how can you not oppose what you see in that picture?
I'm opposed to that. I wish there were 0 abortions.

Just because I think abortion should be legal, but restricted doesn't mean I support abortion.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:12 am
by Bronco
"I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." ~Ronald Reagan

"Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions."BHO

Why does BHO hate black people?
Dr. Alveda King -- "The great irony, is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of."

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:31 am
by JoltinJoe
Skjellyfetti wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote: I do ask people here, though, how can you not oppose what you see in that picture?
I'm opposed to that. I wish there were 0 abortions.

Just because I think abortion should be legal, but restricted doesn't mean I support abortion.
I didn't say you supported abortion.

However, if one supports legalized abortion on demand, you certainly support abortion. If you oppose abortion in all cases but for some narrow exceptions for the health of the mother or rape, incest, etc., then I'd agree that you oppose abortion.

What type of restrictions do you support?

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:31 am
by grizzaholic
MEH. Rights of the people are important.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:05 pm
by MSUDuo
grizzaholic wrote:MEH. Rights of the people are important.
You mean except for the rights of the babies right?

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 pm
by Bronco
-
Let's talk about rights

the right to choose unless it's a doctor, med provider, or religious group
BHO's policies don't allow choice for these folks

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:31 pm
by Pwns
Skjellyfetti wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote: I do ask people here, though, how can you not oppose what you see in that picture?
I'm opposed to that. I wish there were 0 abortions.

Just because I think abortion should be legal, but restricted doesn't mean I support abortion.
I wish child abuse never happened, but think it should be legal. What do you think about that?

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:47 pm
by mainejeff
Like I've said......conservatives love saving the fetuses.......and then after they're born, they want NOTHING to do with them or the resulting social and economic issues. They just go on blaming the mothers and "liberals" for everything.

FU Conks!

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:53 pm
by catamount man
Said Mother of child should be responsible for the child after the child is born jeffy. Here's a clue, don't want a kid, KEEP YOUR FUCKING PANTS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

People that can't hold a job, obey the laws of the state and can't see the forest for the trees SHOULDN'T BE FUCKING!!! Birth control doesn't always do the job jeffyboy. If you can't raise a kid, then quit fucking!!!!!!

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:53 pm
by D1B
JoltinJoe wrote:CM, I agree it is important to see what abortion victims look like, but calling people here "murderers" or saying that the blood is on their hands, is both counter-productive and really not true.

I do ask people here, though, how can you not oppose what you see in that picture?

The victim in this photo was aborted through the saline solution procedure. To accomplish this, the abortionist injects a salty solution directly into the amniotic sac, which of course is the source of nourishment for the growing fetus. So instead of obtaining the nourishment needed to grow,the fetus is essentially suffocated to death by the poison which has been injected into the amniotic sac. The fetus breathes in the saline solution, becomes poisoned, convulses, struggles, and then dies. This process takes over an hour before the fetus dies. The mother usually delivers the dead fetus within the next two days.
Joe, what were the circumstances behind the abortion?

As always - provide your sources.

Fetuses aint people.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:55 pm
by D1B
catamount man wrote:Said Mother of child should be responsible for the child after the child is born jeffy. Here's a clue, don't want a kid, KEEP YOUR FUCKING PANTS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

People that can't hold a job, obey the laws of the state and can't see the forest for the trees SHOULDN'T BE FUCKING!!! Birth control doesn't always do the job jeffyboy. If you can't raise a kid, then quit fucking!!!!!!
You're gonna blow a gasket, Fatamountman. Your church has been trying to get people to stop fucking for 2000 years and nothing has worked.

Fetuses aint people.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:00 pm
by mainejeff
catamount man wrote:Said Mother of child should be responsible for the child after the child is born jeffy. Here's a clue, don't want a kid, KEEP YOUR **** PANTS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

People that can't hold a job, obey the laws of the state and can't see the forest for the trees SHOULDN'T BE ****!!! Birth control doesn't always do the job jeffyboy. If you can't raise a kid, then quit ****!!!!!!
Yes.........Conservatives are GREAT at creating a self-delusional utopia in their own mind.......and then unleashing it on a real world through governmental intervention. Great plan you have there! :thumb: :roll:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:13 pm
by grizzaholic
D1B wrote:
catamount man wrote:Said Mother of child should be responsible for the child after the child is born jeffy. Here's a clue, don't want a kid, KEEP YOUR FUCKING PANTS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

People that can't hold a job, obey the laws of the state and can't see the forest for the trees SHOULDN'T BE FUCKING!!! Birth control doesn't always do the job jeffyboy. If you can't raise a kid, then quit fucking!!!!!!
You're gonna blow a gasket, Fatamountman. Your church has been trying to get people to stop fucking for 2000 years and nothing has worked.

Fetuses aint people.
If they quit fucking they wouldn't have any monies.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:32 pm
by D1B
grizzaholic wrote:
D1B wrote:
You're gonna blow a gasket, Fatamountman. Your church has been trying to get people to stop fucking for 2000 years and nothing has worked.

Fetuses aint people.
If they quit fucking they wouldn't have any monies.
Jizzaholic, you have no clue regarding the actual conditions of poverty and gender relations amongst the poor. You simply regurgitate the sponsored ramblings of Rush Limbaugh and chri$tian churches.

Do us all a favor and take one of your 1369 guns and blow your fucking brains out. :thumb:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:32 pm
by grizzaholic
D1B wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
If they quit fucking they wouldn't have any monies.
Jizzaholic, you have no clue regarding the actual conditions of poverty and gender relations amongst the poor. You simply regurgitate the sponsored ramblings of Rush Limbaugh and chri$tian churches.

Do us all a favor and take one of your 1369 guns and blow your fucking brains out. :thumb:
Ok. I will do that right now.

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:34 pm
by D1B
grizzaholic wrote:
D1B wrote:
Jizzaholic, you have no clue regarding the actual conditions of poverty and gender relations amongst the poor. You simply regurgitate the sponsored ramblings of Rush Limbaugh and chri$tian churches.

Do us all a favor and take one of your 1369 guns and blow your fucking brains out. :thumb:
Ok. I will do that right now.

WAIT! Send me the $113.61 that's in your checking account. I need a new blender.

:thumb:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:50 pm
by Vidav
grizzaholic wrote:
D1B wrote:
Jizzaholic, you have no clue regarding the actual conditions of poverty and gender relations amongst the poor. You simply regurgitate the sponsored ramblings of Rush Limbaugh and chri$tian churches.

Do us all a favor and take one of your 1369 guns and blow your fucking brains out. :thumb:
Ok. I will do that right now.
Fucking D, now I will never get that DVD. Thanks a lot. :ohno:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:55 pm
by MSUDuo
You don't have to be rich to have kids. But you need to know what the *%#& you're doing if you're going to bring a child into this world. That goes for the rich and poor.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk

Re: today's victom of

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:05 pm
by kalm
MSUDuo wrote:You don't have to be rich to have kids. But you need to know what the *%#& you're doing if you're going to bring a child into this world. That goes for the rich and poor.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
No you don't, and that's the problem. As D pointed out, we've been trying to teach the consequences of pregnancy for a very long time now and it still ain't working regardless of whether it's a US welfare mom on the dole, or a kid born into instant starvation in Africa.

So we can waste billions of dollars and a few thousand more years trying to educate and appeal to their sensibilities or give them a $.50 piece of latex.

:coffee:

Re: today's victom of "choice"

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:45 pm
by MSUDuo
kalm wrote:
MSUDuo wrote:You don't have to be rich to have kids. But you need to know what the *%#& you're doing if you're going to bring a child into this world. That goes for the rich and poor.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
No you don't, and that's the problem. As D pointed out, we've been trying to teach the consequences of pregnancy for a very long time now and it still ain't working regardless of whether it's a US welfare mom on the dole, or a kid born into instant starvation in Africa.

So we can waste billions of dollars and a few thousand more years trying to educate and appeal to their sensibilities or give them a $.50 piece of latex.

:coffee:
Condoms are 100% effective? News to me...

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk