Page 1 of 1
Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:37 pm
by mainejeff
He's being thrown under the bus by his own party's leadership. (take that Tea Party!)
He wants to establish a base on the Moon and go to Mars. (I hear that Mars needs moms

)
This is gonna be fun!

Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:00 pm
by ∞∞∞
I know Mars and Moon bases sound silly, but I'm glad that at least one candidate wants the United States to challenge itself, explore new worlds, and show its technological prowess. President Bush had a great space vision and unfortunately President Obama killed it. I'd like us to renew it because even if it costs a pretty penny, one thing space exploration can do is unite a nation and inspire younger generations to think big. I honestly believe the intangible benefits would outweigh the monetary costs.
Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:07 pm
by Cap'n Cat
∞∞∞ wrote:I know Mars and Moon bases sound silly, but I'm glad that at least one candidate wants the United States to challenge itself, explore new worlds, and show its technological prowess. President Bush had a great space vision and unfortunately President Obama killed it. I'd like us to renew it because even if it costs a pretty penny, one thing space exploration can do is unite a nation and inspire younger generations to think big. I honestly believe the intangible benefits would outweigh the monetary costs.
Yeah, you're right, but the Conks left us with such shitty problems that even thinking of further space exploration is for another time.
Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:19 pm
by D1B
Cap'n Cat wrote:∞∞∞ wrote:I know Mars and Moon bases sound silly, but I'm glad that at least one candidate wants the United States to challenge itself, explore new worlds, and show its technological prowess. President Bush had a great space vision and unfortunately President Obama killed it. I'd like us to renew it because even if it costs a pretty penny, one thing space exploration can do is unite a nation and inspire younger generations to think big. I honestly believe the intangible benefits would outweigh the monetary costs.
Yeah, you're right, but the Conks left us with such shitty problems that even thinking of further space exploration is for another time.
And the second Obama unveils a new space initiative, conks (Z and Ivytaint) would let him have it for not addressing the american economy.
Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:25 pm
by Cap'n Cat
Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:07 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Cap'n Cat wrote:∞∞∞ wrote:I know Mars and Moon bases sound silly, but I'm glad that at least one candidate wants the United States to challenge itself, explore new worlds, and show its technological prowess. President Bush had a great space vision and unfortunately President Obama killed it. I'd like us to renew it because even if it costs a pretty penny, one thing space exploration can do is unite a nation and inspire younger generations to think big. I honestly believe the intangible benefits would outweigh the monetary costs.
Yeah, you're right, but the Conks left us with such shitty problems that even thinking of further space exploration is for another time.
Shitty problems like Social Security, Welfare, and Universal healthcare................no wonder there is no money left for you jackasses to steal or spend.

Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:19 pm
by Cap'n Cat
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Yeah, you're right, but the Conks left us with such shitty problems that even thinking of further space exploration is for another time.
Alfie:
"Shitty problems like Social Security, Welfare, and Universal healthcare................no wonder there is no money left for you jackasses to steal or spend."
Re: Newt
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:32 pm
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Yeah, you're right, but the Conks left us with such shitty problems that even thinking of further space exploration is for another time.
And the second Obama unveils a new space initiative, conks (Z and Ivytaint) would let him have it for not addressing the american economy.
I agree with both of you and disagree with Newt here.

Re: Newt
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:59 am
by Ivytalk
Dildo1Bugger has used that clever term before. Must be out of meth.

Re: Newt
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:49 am
by D1B
Ivytalk wrote:
Dildo1Bugger has used that clever term before. Must be out of meth.

I got twelve more terms for you, at least. Advice:
Let the giant sleep

Re: Newt
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:35 am
by mainejeff
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Shitty problems like Social Security, Welfare, and Universal healthcare................no wonder there is no money left for Newt to steal or spend.

FIFY.

Re: Newt
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:16 pm
by Bronco
-
Newt won't be the nominee and in one sense it is a shame
In every debate he would make the food stamp president cry

Re: Newt
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:19 pm
by houndawg