Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's fuckups".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's ****".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

The answer is never, AND just a couple years after he is gone, Obama will be revised and re-written as the post racial unifier and problem solver that he was supposed to be in the first place.


Sent from my iPad using one stinky pinky.

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's ****".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

I would have said 1 year.

mainejeff wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's ****".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

I would have said 1 year.

You would have been in the vast minority for a donk, then.

AZGrizFan wrote:

mainejeff wrote:
I would have said 1 year.

You would have been in the vast minority for a donk, then.

You mean I'm not a lock-step liberal minion?.......darn.

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

I would say 6 months.

Why do I get the feeling that he's considering trying to get the presidential term limit repealed? Can you imagine ANOTHER eight years of this trash, all the while blaming his incompetency on Bush?

this trash is better than the shit coming out of the R party (save ron paul).

Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

Ref flags went up for many on the left the first week when he appointed Geithner and Summers. The establishment will always support him and dissent from his own side of the fence gets brushed aside like Rahm Emmanuel's "professional left" remark.

CID1990 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's ****".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

The answer is never, AND just a couple years after he is gone, Obama will be revised and re-written as the post racial unifier and problem solver that he was supposed to be in the first place.


Sent from my iPad using one stinky pinky.

Question was specifically addressed to donks, butthole. Try following directions you AADD know it all conk.

Ivytalk wrote:Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

W cowardly dodged vietnam and did coke and barely graduated. His wife murdered a man while drunk.

D1B wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

W cowardly dodged vietnam and did coke and barely graduated. His wife murdered a man while drunk.

See, even Obama's past is Bush's fault.

Was AGS really around in 2001?

SuperHornet wrote:Why do I get the feeling that he's considering trying to get the presidential term limit repealed? Can you imagine ANOTHER eight years of this trash, all the while blaming his incompetency on Bush?

A lot of shit was W's administrations fault. A lot of shit is Obama's administrations fault.

I'm not happy with either of them. Horrible presidents.

D1B wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
The answer is never, AND just a couple years after he is gone, Obama will be revised and re-written as the post racial unifier and problem solver that he was supposed to be in the first place.


Sent from my iPad using one stinky pinky.

Question was specifically addressed to donks, butthole. Try following directions you AADD know it all conk.

My butthole is just fine, D. Just because yours quivers at the memory of Father Bob's deep anal visit to you in the name of the living Christ doesn't mean you have to be so hostile. Take a pill (or just bite down on your choirboy sash) and realize what is good for you. In this case, that would be reality.


Sent from my iPad using one stinky pinky.

Ivytalk wrote:Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

You must feel a kinship with him.

D1B wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

W cowardly dodged vietnam and did coke and barely graduated. His wife murdered a man while drunk.

Biden murdered a sober man's reputation while sober. Kennedy murdered a woman while drunk. Obama is killing the Constitution while stupid.

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's fuckups".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

What, did you think it was going to take three months to fix all that?????


Moot point when the sculptures pull up to Rushmore in a few years and start chipping away preparing that powerful African-American chin............

Ivytalk wrote:Never. He was the type of bratty little kid who never accepted responsibility for anything, even when caught red-handed with the fat doobie at the fancy Hawaiian prep school he attended.

Biden murdered a sober man's reputation while sober. Kennedy murdered a woman while drunk. Both parties are killing the Constitution while stupid.

FIFY

Cap'n Cat wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:8 months into his first term, the twin towers went down and donks (then on AGS) absolutely flamesprayed Bush and absolved Clinton of any responsibility for what happened. Yet here we are, 36 months---three FULL YEARS into Obama's first term and Donks ROUTINELY claim that Obama isn't responsible for what's happening and he's "just trying to fix Bush's ****".

At what point, in your minds, does stuff that's impacting this country become Obama's fault?

4 years?
5 years?
Never?

What, did you think it was going to take three months to fix all that?????


Moot point when the sculptures pull up to Rushmore in a few years and start chipping away preparing that powerful Halfrican-American chin............

FIFY

I have always said...including on AGS many years ago...that people underestimate the impact of a President upon the economy. I think the economy has ups and downs and there's a limit to what the Presidident can do about it. I don't think the downturn of 2008 was President Bush's "fault." I don't think the expansion of the 1990s was "caused" by Bill Clinton. I don't think the recovery of the 80s was "caused" by Ronald Reagan or that the previous malaise was "caused" by Jimmy Carter. And I don't think the mild recession of the late 90s was "caused" by George Bush.

I have always said that one of the tragedies of American politics is that people vote based on what the economy is doing as though whoever the President is at the time is the "cause" of whether it is good or bad at that particular time. I think people ought to vote on the basis of consideration of the long term direction of the country.

On Obama: When he was elected I wrote on AGS that I thought he was in good shape because there was an economimc crisis and things would get better regardless of who was President during the term he was going to occupy. And he would get credit for that. It's taken a while but I think it's going to happen. I think we are starting to go into an up cycle that has little if anything to do with Obama but he will get credit for it and it will help him win re-election.

JohnStOnge wrote:I have always said...including on AGS many years ago...that people underestimate the impact of a President upon the economy. I think the economy has ups and downs and there's a limit to what the Presidident can do about it. I don't think the downturn of 2008 was President Bush's "fault." I don't think the expansion of the 1990s was "caused" by Bill Clinton. I don't think the recovery of the 80s was "caused" by Ronald Reagan or that the previous malaise was "caused" by Jimmy Carter. And I don't think the mild recession of the late 90s was "caused" by George Bush.

I have always said that one of the tragedies of American politics is that people vote based on what the economy is doing as though whoever the President is at the time is the "cause" of whether it is good or bad at that particular time. I think people ought to vote on the basis of consideration of the long term direction of the country.

On Obama: When he was elected I wrote on AGS that I thought he was in good shape because there was an economimc crisis and things would get better regardless of who was President during the term he was going to occupy. And he would get credit for that. It's taken a while but I think it's going to happen. I think we are starting to go into an up cycle that has little if anything to do with Obama but he will get credit for it and it will help him win re-election.

The Cap'n agrees with St. Wronge.