Let's Lock the Hitchens Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:02 pm
... it now has the appropriate number of posts for such a thread. 
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=28402
∞∞∞ wrote:It's also appropriate that it's D1B's post.
This.kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and shit that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.
Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.
Except my love for you.Ivytalk wrote:Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.
It comes over the mountain. Does rise somewhere else for you?Ivytalk wrote:Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.
There is a joke here you seem to be missing ....kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.
Damn, I was wondering if I missed something.JoltinJoe wrote:There is a joke here you seem to be missing ....kalm wrote:Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.![]()
Look at the number of posts![]()
You're welcome.∞∞∞ wrote:It's also appropriate that it's D1B's post.
edit: but seriously, someone kill that fucking thread!
For the record I didn't lock it because people were upset or any such thing. It was because it was at 666 posts and multiple people, those actually contributing to it, asked for it.Skjellyfetti wrote:What a bunch of little bitches. Isn't this what everyone bitched about on AGS?
If you don't like it... ignore it like a fucking grown up.
And look who finished it!Vidav wrote:I'm glad I could provide the starting post for such an epic thread.
Ivytalk wrote:And look who finished it!Vidav wrote:I'm glad I could provide the starting post for such an epic thread.
FIFY!AZGrizFan wrote:Run-on thread of the year candidate.