Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Are any of these idiots you're putting in front of America any better than my boy, Obama?





Be honest, now.........

Discuss.

Paul

Yes they are all better because his philosophy of government, if implemented, takes us in the wrong direction.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Are any of these idiots you're putting in front of America any better than my boy, Obama?





Be honest, now.........

Discuss.

There's a REASON your first one has already dropped out and your second one is getting about 5% of the vote.

Nice try.

grizzaholic wrote:Paul

+1

Neither ofthose two ever had a chance to be the nominees, so point moot.

It would be like asking you why you think Jesse Jackson would make a better president than anyone we have had for the last 50 years.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Are any of these idiots you're putting in front of America any better than my boy, Obama?

Rayciss! Where Opie be at?

Cap'n Cat wrote:Are any of these idiots you're putting in front of America any better than my boy, Obama?





Be honest, now.........

Discuss.

IMHO, any of the batshit crazies are better than Obama. YES, he's that bad.

Cap'n
You'd be a better choice than BHO
You've had jobs, lived within a budget, and paid your bills


I can understand how some voters were fooled last time but who is fooled now?


Country can't afford another 4 years

Unfortunately, I am beginning the to think the question is equivalent to Donald Duck versus Mickey Mouse

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (1/15/12
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 1/15/12 | Scott Rasmussen


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 21% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -20


(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OL FU wrote:Unfortunately, I am beginning the to think the question is equivalent to Donald Duck versus Mickey Mouse

Agree. This election is starting to look very similar to 2004. The Democrats put a cardboard cut-out of a candidate with serious flaws and limited personality (Kerry) against an incumbent Republican that was running the country into the ground. Switch the labels and put Romney in parenthesis and you have 2012. If things hold to form, we could have 16 years of massive deficit spending and no significant movement toward preparing the US for the long-term.

UNI88 wrote:

OL FU wrote:Unfortunately, I am beginning the to think the question is equivalent to Donald Duck versus Mickey Mouse

Agree. This election is starting to look very similar to 2004. The Democrats put a cardboard cut-out of a candidate with serious flaws and limited personality (Kerry) against an incumbent Republican that was running the country into the ground. Switch the labels and put Romney in parenthesis and you have 2012. If things hold to form, we could have 16 years of massive deficit spending and no significant movement toward preparing the US for the long-term.

One man's "running the country into the ground" is another man's war profits bonanza.