Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Scientist go BOOM!

US denies killing Iran nuclear scientist with magnetic bomb

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45953703/


So...

...is ANY Iranian surprised about these incidents when their Supreme Nutjob and Mullahs brag about starting wars, building a "big atomic bomb", exterminating the Jews and wiping Israel off this planet?

Any Iranian working towards a "nuclear" goal better keep their life insurance premiums current.

I hope we did it while denying it, that is one lie I agree with.

Honestly - as happy as I am to see their ambitions delayed... I can't condone terrorism, and that's what this is.

Put the shoe on another foot - if an agent from another country had ridden along upside a car on a street in Washington or Chicago and blown up the sedan of a scientist... we'd call it terrorism and be outraged - and rightly so.

That being said - I'm not as sad or outraged as some others by this...

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:I hope we did it while denying it, that is one lie I agree with.

We also weren't spying on them with a drone

Personally i think it was the zionists.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45953703/


"TEHRAN, Iran — Updated at 1:15 p.m. ET: The Obama administration is denying any role in the killing of an Iranian university professor working at a key nuclear facility. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said the U.S. "had absolutely nothing to do" with Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan's death and the U.S. condemns "all acts of violence, including acts of violence like what is being reported today."



The U.S. condemns "all acts of violence"...holy crap...did he say that with a straight face?

Well, uhhh...we do condemn all acts of violence...except drone attacks on "high priority" targets with civilian collateral damage, helicopter raids that result in the shooting of an unarmed man, supporting air attacks on other country's leader's people, invasion of several countries...etc., etc., etc.

Good grief.

Cluck U wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45953703/


"TEHRAN, Iran — Updated at 1:15 p.m. ET: The Obama administration is denying any role in the killing of an Iranian university professor working at a key nuclear facility. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said the U.S. "had absolutely nothing to do" with Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan's death and the U.S. condemns "all acts of violence, including acts of violence like what is being reported today."



The U.S. condemns "all acts of violence"...holy crap...did he say that with a straight face?

Well, uhhh...we do condemn all acts of violence...except drone attacks on "high priority" targets with civilian collateral damage, helicopter raids that result in the shooting of an unarmed man, supporting air attacks on other country'sleader's people, invasion of several countries...etc., etc., etc.

Good grief.

But Barry sure was quick to claim credit for nailing Osama!

Some violence is more justifiable than others....

Ivytalk wrote:

Cluck U wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45953703/


"TEHRAN, Iran — Updated at 1:15 p.m. ET: The Obama administration is denying any role in the killing of an Iranian university professor working at a key nuclear facility. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said the U.S. "had absolutely nothing to do" with Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan's death and the U.S. condemns "all acts of violence, including acts of violence like what is being reported today."



The U.S. condemns "all acts of violence"...holy crap...did he say that with a straight face?

Well, uhhh...we do condemn all acts of violence...except drone attacks on "high priority" targets with civilian collateral damage, helicopter raids that result in the shooting of an unarmed man, supporting air attacks on other country'sleader's people, invasion of several countries...etc., etc., etc.

Good grief.

But Barry sure was quick to claim credit for nailing Osama!

Some violence is more justifiable than others....

Surely, IT, you must be mistaken. The White House spokesman Tommy Vietor was clear in his statement that the U.S. condemns "all acts of violence." Cowboy Obama would not dare send out an official lie to the public, would he?

Nice work Israel.

93henfan wrote:Nice work Israel.

What yid you say?

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:Honestly - as happy as I am to see their ambitions delayed... I can't condone terrorism, and that's what this is.

Put the shoe on another foot - if an agent from another country had ridden along upside a car on a street in Washington or Chicago and blown up the sedan of a scientist... we'd call it terrorism and be outraged - and rightly so.

That being said - I'm not as sad or outraged as some others by this...

One of the comments to the article expressed the "differences" well...

Iran builds a nuclear capability.

Iran supports terrorist groups including Hamas.

Iran builds high tech shape charge IEDs used in Iraq.

Iran's influence in Iraq is undeniable.

Iran rattles sabres in the Gulf.

Iran uses covert spies in U.S. to strike political enemies.

Iran strengthens ties with Chavez and both joke about the 'bomb.'

...and Ahmanutjob has pledged to destroy the Jews and Israel.

The U.S. is not Iran.

U.S. Presidents are not loose cannons like Ahmanutjob.

Next.

CAA Flagship wrote:

93henfan wrote:Nice work Israel.

What yid you say?

I said they should hire 89Hen. Hebrews his own beer.

93henfan wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: What yid you say?

I said they should hire 89Hen. Hebrews his own beer.

Don't you have some push ups to do?

Cluck U wrote:

93henfan wrote:
I said they should hire 89Hen. Hebrews his own beer.

Don't you have some push ups to do?

He popped a few tops of this and his liver was healed.

I am fine living under certain illusions without caring too much about who did what may have been done. We didn't do it but it's done. Good for us.

Barrack is doing a pretty good job of taking care of shit even if he isn't doing anything in that regard.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
Barrack is doing a pretty good job of taking care of shit even if he isn't doing anything in that regard.

The fact that Obama has gotten shit done foreign policy-wise, shit that Bush couldn't get done, really eats at the crotchety old men on this site.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:Honestly - as happy as I am to see their ambitions delayed... I can't condone terrorism, and that's what this is.

Put the shoe on another foot - if an agent from another country had ridden along upside a car on a street in Washington or Chicago and blown up the sedan of a scientist... we'd call it terrorism and be outraged - and rightly so.

That being said - I'm not as sad or outraged as some others by this...

Wrong. It is an act of war, committed by state actors. It is focused, with an obvious strategic aim. If the above scenario occurred as you described, we would not call it terrorism, we would call it an act of war and then we would (hopefully) act accordingly.

Just like bombing Libya, invading Afghanistan or invading Iraq. (Or was that terrorism, too?)

Iran is free to declare war on whatever country is responsible for this. It would be a short war.

93henfan wrote:

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
Barrack is doing a pretty good job of taking care of shit even if he isn't doing anything in that regard.

The fact that Obama has gotten shit done foreign policy-wise, shit that Bush couldn't get done, really eats at the crotchety old men on this site.

No, what "eats at the crotchety old men on this site" is that Barry can't bring himself to admit that he's accomplishing all this "foreign policy" shit using the apparatus BUSH set up and he railed against in the runup to the 2008 election.

travelinman67 wrote:Iran builds a nuclear capability.

Iran supports terrorist groups including Hamas.

Iran builds high tech shape charge IEDs used in Iraq.

Iran's influence in Iraq is undeniable.

Iran rattles sabres in the Gulf.

Iran uses covert spies in U.S. to strike political enemies.

Iran strengthens ties with Chavez and both joke about the 'bomb.'

Look, I'm no fan of Iran, but let's be real...

The US built nuclear capability and has used it twice.

The US has supported what other countries would consider terrorist groups around the world.

The US builds all kinds of weapons that have killed FAR more people in Iraq.

The US influence in Iraq is undeniable.

The US rattles sabres in the Gulf.

The US uses cover spies in every country in the world.

[youtube][/youtube]

travelinman67 wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:Honestly - as happy as I am to see their ambitions delayed... I can't condone terrorism, and that's what this is.

Put the shoe on another foot - if an agent from another country had ridden along upside a car on a street in Washington or Chicago and blown up the sedan of a scientist... we'd call it terrorism and be outraged - and rightly so.

That being said - I'm not as sad or outraged as some others by this...

One of the comments to the article expressed the "differences" well...

Iran builds a nuclear capability.

Iran supports terrorist groups including Hamas.

Iran builds high tech shape charge IEDs used in Iraq.

Iran's influence in Iraq is undeniable.

Iran rattles sabres in the Gulf.

Iran uses covert spies in U.S. to strike political enemies.

Iran strengthens ties with Chavez and both joke about the 'bomb.'

...and Ahmanutjob has pledged to destroy the Jews and Israel.

The U.S. is not Iran.

U.S. Presidents are not loose cannons like Ahmanutjob.

Next.

Fuck that, send everything we've got.

AZGrizFan wrote:

93henfan wrote:
The fact that Obama has gotten shit done foreign policy-wise, shit that Bush couldn't get done, really eats at the crotchety old men on this site.

No, what "eats at the crotchety old men on this site" is that Barry can't bring himself to admit that he's accomplishing all this "foreign policy" shit using the apparatus BUSH set up and he railed against in the runup to the 2008 election.

Seriously, don't let it bother you. It's okay to throw an attaboy at the man who got Bin Laden.

"Evil-doers"

Gotta love propaganda

93henfan wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:

No, what "eats at the crotchety old men on this site" is that Barry can't bring himself to admit that he's accomplishing all this "foreign policy" shit using the apparatus BUSH set up and he railed against in the runup to the 2008 election.

Seriously, don't let it bother you. It's okay to throw an attaboy at the man who got Bin Laden.

The hell you say.

93henfan wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:

No, what "eats at the crotchety old men on this site" is that Barry can't bring himself to admit that he's accomplishing all this "foreign policy" shit using the apparatus BUSH set up and he railed against in the runup to the 2008 election.

Seriously, don't let it bother you. It's okay to throw an attaboy at the man who got Bin Laden.

I have...but that's a two way street. Unfortuantely, for the blamemeister it's not....he's the biggest check valve on the planet. Everything good was his doing, everything bad was Bush's fault. Honestly, 36 months into a presidency I've never seen anything like it.

AZGrizFan wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Seriously, don't let it bother you. It's okay to throw an attaboy at the man who got Bin Laden.

I have...but that's a two way street. Unfortuantely, for the blamemeister it's not....he's the biggest check valve on the planet. Everything good was his doing, everything bad was Bush's fault. Honestly, 36 months into a presidency I've never seen anything like it.

Whatever. Obama was mild compared to the accussations of the Clintons stealing whitehouse silverware.

kalm wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
I have...but that's a two way street. Unfortuantely, for the blamemeister it's not....he's the biggest check valve on the planet. Everything good was his doing, everything bad was Bush's fault. Honestly, 36 months into a presidency I've never seen anything like it.

Whatever. Obama was mild compared to the accussations of the Clintons stealing whitehouse silverware.

Now you're equating silverware with national security policy? Apples and oranges, my friend...apples and oranges. You may be even worse at these analogies than me...and THAT is saying something.