Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Seriously??

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Only conks grow Christmas trees?

AZGrizFan wrote:Only conks grow Christmas trees?

No, they were the ones who had a stroke over this, and wrongly called it "Obama's Christmas tree tax".

What I'd LOVE to see is the accounting for the spending of $70 MILLION on cotton ads.

Brought to you by the folks at the anti-business Heritage Foundation.

AZGrizFan wrote:What I'd LOVE to see is the account for the spending of $70 MILLION on cotton ads.

Dude! What timing!!

I was catching up on Beavis and Butthead episodes on the MTV website last night. The commercials (which you can't skip) are always annoying, but when I watched the most recent episode lat night, instead of having four various annoying commercials during each break, they played the same annoying commercial four times back to back to back to back at each break.

The commercial? Kate Bosworth singing about the "touch and feel of cotton, the fabric of our lives".

Holy shit was that annoying.

Here it is:

[youtube][/youtube]

Now watch it twelve times in a row. If you're like me, the progression will be:

1. I'd do her. She's hot and has a nice voice.
2. I'd do her. She's skinny but nice looking. Her voice is decent.
3. I'd do her. She's borderline anorexic, but that probably means she'd make me more sandwiches. Her voice is kind of annoying though.
4. I dunno. That bitch is skinnier than my cat. I sort of wish she'd just shut up and make me a sandwich.
5-12. Someone needs to kill this bitch and ban this commercial.

93henfan wrote:Here it is:

[youtube][/youtube]

Now watch it twelve times in a row. If you're like me, the progression will be:

1. I'd do her. She's hot and has a nice voice.
2. I'd do her. She's skinny but nice looking. Her voice is decent.
3. I'd do her. She's borderline anorexic, but that probably means she'd make me more sandwiches. Her voice is kind of annoying though.
4. I dunno. That bitch is skinnier than my cat. I sort of wish she'd just shut up and make me a sandwich.
5-12. Someone needs to kill this bitch and ban this commercial.

93henfan wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:What I'd LOVE to see is the accounting for the spending of $70 MILLION on cotton ads.

Dude! What timing!!

I was catching up on Beavis and Butthead episodes on the MTV website last night. The commercials (which you can't skip) are always annoying, but when I watched the most recent episode lat night, instead of having four various annoying commercials during each break, they played the same annoying commercial four times back to back to back to back at each break.

The commercial? Kate Bosworth singing about the "touch and feel of cotton, the fabric of our lives".

Holy shit was that annoying.

I am here merely to set things on a tee for you, 93.

AZGrizFan wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Dude! What timing!!

I was catching up on Beavis and Butthead episodes on the MTV website last night. The commercials (which you can't skip) are always annoying, but when I watched the most recent episode lat night, instead of having four various annoying commercials during each break, they played the same annoying commercial four times back to back to back to back at each break.

The commercial? Kate Bosworth singing about the "touch and feel of cotton, the fabric of our lives".

Holy shit was that annoying.

I am here merely to set things on a tee for you, 93.

And I'm not embellishing a damn thing here. Check out MTV, look for the most recent episode (they test drive a used car) and see if they don't have this bitch singing nonstop during the breaks. If it was just me that they targeted this too I'm going to be very pissed.

Now, that being said, during last week's episode that I also watched online, they did mix up the commercials some, but the one that got repeated the most was the Buy.XXX commercials with the sort of gray-haired pimp looking dude and the two chicks with humongous fake tits. It's sort of the new GoDaddy-type commercial.

93henfan wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
I am here merely to set things on a tee for you, 93.

And I'm not embellishing a damn thing here. Check out MTV, look for the most recent episode (they test drive a used car) and see if they don't have this bitch singing nonstop during the breaks. If it was just me that they targeted this too I'm going to be very pissed.

No, they probably targeted to all guys who wear cotton polo shirts inside out.

kalm wrote:

93henfan wrote:
And I'm not embellishing a damn thing here. Check out MTV, look for the most recent episode (they test drive a used car) and see if they don't have this bitch singing nonstop during the breaks. If it was just me that they targeted this too I'm going to be very pissed.

No, they probably targeted to all guys who wear cotton polo shirts inside out.

You'll need to take that up with the JMU and ODU alums here. You have seen the pic of Razor, right?

kalm wrote:

93henfan wrote:
And I'm not embellishing a damn thing here. Check out MTV, look for the most recent episode (they test drive a used car) and see if they don't have this bitch singing nonstop during the breaks. If it was just me that they targeted this too I'm going to be very pissed.

No, they probably targeted to all guys who wear cotton polo shirts inside out.

Or guys who "layer" one cotton polo on top of another! Good call, Biff!

Ivytalk wrote:

kalm wrote:
No, they probably targeted to all guys who wear cotton polo shirts inside out.

Or guys who "layer" one cotton polo on top of another! Good call, Biff!

That little exchange still cracks me up.

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:
Or guys who "layer" one cotton polo on top of another! Good call, Biff!

That little exchange still cracks me up.

Well, you ARE known for being easily amused.

We'll be back after a word from our sponsors (meaning AZ needs a 5 minute break).

I did not know that HBCUs had soccer.

Learn something new every day on cs.com.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
That little exchange still cracks me up.

Well, you ARE known for being easily amused.

Thanks Z! That means a lot coming from...wait...what?

93henfan wrote:Here it is:

[youtube][/youtube]

Now watch it twelve times in a row. If you're like me, the progression will be:

1. I'd do her. She's hot and has a nice voice.
2. I'd do her. She's skinny but nice looking. Her voice is decent.
3. I'd do her. She's borderline anorexic, but that probably means she'd make me more sandwiches. Her voice is kind of annoying though.
4. I dunno. That bitch is skinnier than my cat. I sort of wish she'd just shut up and make me a sandwich.
5-12. Someone needs to kill this bitch and ban this commercial.

I am going straight to step 13

13) block all youtube videos

OH SWEET BABY JESUS!!!!

CAA Flagship wrote:We'll be back after a word from our sponsors (meaning AZ needs a 5 minute break).

AZGrizFan wrote:OH SWEET BABY JESUS!!!!

Merry Christmas

All other things aside, why should Government step in to help sellers of real Christmas trees gain any advantage over sellers of artificial Christmas trees? They are competitors. Why should Government step in to help one side?

JohnStOnge wrote:All other things aside, why should Government step in to help sellers of real Christmas trees gain any advantage over sellers of artificial Christmas trees? They are competitors. Why should Government step in to help one side?

1) It was a self inflicted tax to pay for it. It's democracy.

2) Government helps every other frisking industry. What's wrong with the tree farmers getting there's?

1) It was a self inflicted tax to pay for it. It's democracy.

2) Government helps every other frisking industry. What's wrong with the tree farmers getting there's?

I'm guessing it was a tax that would be passed on to people who bought Christmas Trees and who didn't inflict it upon themselves except in the sense that they bought the Christmas trees.

Perhaps we should re-examine the extent to whcih government helps industry. However, a "tax breaK is not, in my opinion, a subsidy. You are not giving somebody something by "letting" them keep their own money. So that kind of stuff does not, in my opinion, qualify.

But for darned sure government shouldn't be taxing people in in order to pay for some industry's advertising.

JohnStOnge wrote:

1) It was a self inflicted tax to pay for it. It's democracy.

2) Government helps every other frisking industry. What's wrong with the tree farmers getting there's?

I'm guessing it was a tax that would be passed on to people who bought Christmas Trees and who didn't inflict it upon themselves except in the sense that they bought the Christmas trees.

Perhaps we should re-examine the extent to whcih government helps industry. However, a "tax breaK is not, in my opinion, a subsidy. You are not giving somebody something by "letting" them keep their own money. So that kind of stuff does not, in my opinion, qualify.

But for darned sure government shouldn't be taxing people in in order to pay for some industry's advertising.

The tree industry was paying for it, not 'people' in general.