Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

89Hen wrote:Am I supposed to be able to hear that?

dbackjon wrote:

89Hen wrote:Am I supposed to be able to hear that?

He said "My Mommy's gay and doesn't need fixing"

dbackjon wrote:

89Hen wrote:Am I supposed to be able to hear that?

He said "My Mommy's gay and doesn't need fixing"

andy7171 wrote:He didn't want to say it. His mommy wanted him to say it. It was completely inappropriate.

89Hen wrote:

andy7171 wrote:He didn't want to say it. His mommy wanted him to say it. It was completely inappropriate.

Maybe. Of course she did. Not really considering her public stance on the issue.

andy7171 wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

Real nice. Good job mom!

andy7171 wrote:"Do you have something to say?"
Pushes kid forward.
"It's OK say it"
Pushes kid forward.
Kid mumbles it with camera in his face.
Mommy runs away.

Parent fail!

D1B wrote:

andy7171 wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

Real nice. Good job mom!

Yep, great job. Get them exposed to evil early in life so they can fight it.

You on the other hand indoctrinate your children from birth with catholic dogma that teaches them to acquiesce to authority and simply do anything the church says, like hate gays.

D1B wrote:

andy7171 wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

Real nice. Good job mom!

Yep, great job. Get them exposed to evil early in life so they can fight it.

You on the other hand indoctrinate your children from birth with catholic dogma that teaches them to acquiesce to authority and simply do anything the church says, like hate gays.

andy7171 wrote:

D1B wrote:
Yep, great job. Get them exposed to evil early in life so they can fight it.

You on the other hand indoctrinate your children from birth with catholic dogma that teaches them to acquiesce to authority and simply do anything the church says, like hate gays.

I'm assuming she's against gay marriage, I don't know. Regardless of what her stance is, it wrong to use you child as a political pawn. If the mom had something to say, she should have said it. You don't force your kid to say something in front of a camera and then run to youtube to prove your point.

D1B wrote:

andy7171 wrote: I'm assuming she's against gay marriage, I don't know. Regardless of what her stance is, it wrong to use you child as a political pawn. If the mom had something to say, she should have said it. You don't force your kid to say something in front of a camera and then run to youtube to prove your point.

Why do you use your children as pawns for your religion? I see you fucks with your children going door to door and holding signs outside abortion clinics all the fucking time.

I agree with you. Leave your children the fuck alone until they're adults and possess the ability to make their own decisions, rather than force feeding them fairy tales and bullshit YOU don't even believe.

andy7171 wrote:

D1B wrote:
Why do you use your children as pawns for your religion? I see you fucks with your children going door to door and holding signs outside abortion clinics all the fucking time.

I agree with you. Leave your children the fuck alone until they're adults and possess the ability to make their own decisions, rather than force feeding them fairy tales and bullshit YOU don't even believe.

I don't do any of that.
The only thing I know about Bachmann is that the majority of people here at CS.com on both sides consider her "bat shit crazy"
My point is this lady isn't helping her cause by doing this to her child.

andy7171 wrote:I like you better when you question my athleticism.

D1B wrote:Children should be allowed to be children and not be burdened with politics and religion.

Nearly one in five atheist scientists with children involve their families with religious institutions, even if they personally do not agree with the institutions teachings, a recent study says...

..."We thought that these individuals might be less inclined to introduce their children to religious traditions, but we found the exact opposite to be true," Ecklund said. "They want their children to have choices, and it is more consistent with their science identity to expose their children to all sources of knowledge."

Ecklund said there were cases in which survey respondents identified that not only did they introduce their children to one church, but they also attended other religious services in the hope that the children would better understand each denomination.

89Hen wrote:

D1B wrote:Children should be allowed to be children and not be burdened with politics and religion.

Like this kid who's mother put him up to confronting a politician. So you and Andy are in agreement.

∞∞∞ wrote:Interestingly, I saw this on CNN this morning:

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/0 ... &hpt=hp_t2

Nearly one in five atheist scientists with children involve their families with religious institutions, even if they personally do not agree with the institutions teachings, a recent study says...

..."We thought that these individuals might be less inclined to introduce their children to religious traditions, but we found the exact opposite to be true," Ecklund said. "They want their children to have choices, and it is more consistent with their science identity to expose their children to all sources of knowledge."

Ecklund said there were cases in which survey respondents identified that not only did they introduce their children to one church, but they also attended other religious services in the hope that the children would better understand each denomination.

Ivytalk wrote:I thought this thread was going to be about a Jeopardy match.