Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2 ... ?GT1=43001" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And when their wish was granted in 1973.....................

http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/m ... enics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Don't sit here and tell me that LIBERALS have human beings best interests at heart. FUCK YOU ALL YOU WANNABE GODS!!! You care for blacks? HARDLY!

Who said they'd even bother? The vast majority of them will merely ignore it.

And the other two? They'll just try to browbeat you into submission with their FUs and STFUs on this board.

why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Liberals controlled NC during the middle half of the 20th century. Who knew?

Nothing to see here. Just move along folks.

catamount man wrote:http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2 ... ?GT1=43001

And when their wish was granted in 1973.....................

http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/m ... enics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Don't sit here and tell me that LIBERALS have human beings best interests at heart. FUCK YOU ALL YOU WANNABE GODS!!! You care for blacks? HARDLY!

Liberals? It's fucking South Carolina you retard.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Has liberalism really changed that much in 40 years? I can think of a number of liberal members of the House and Senate who began their political careers 40 or even more years ago. Ted Kennedy was elected to the Senate almost 50 years ago and would still be there had he not died of brain cancer less than two years ago.

D1B wrote:

catamount man wrote:http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2 ... ?GT1=43001

And when their wish was granted in 1973.....................

http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/m ... enics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Don't sit here and tell me that LIBERALS have human beings best interests at heart. **** YOU ALL YOU WANNABE GODS!!! You care for blacks? HARDLY!

Liberals? It's **** South Carolina you retard.

Read the large print oh rider of the short bus. NORTH CAROLINA. The eugenics lovers, followers, founders and pushers are all, were, LIBERAL MINDED FUCKS. And you people rail on conservatives for being war mongers. STERILIZATION? SERIOUSLY? D1B, go fuck yourself. you're a load that should've been swallowed.

D1B wrote:

catamount man wrote:http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2 ... ?GT1=43001

And when their wish was granted in 1973.....................

http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/m ... enics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Don't sit here and tell me that LIBERALS have human beings best interests at heart. FUCK YOU ALL YOU WANNABE GODS!!! You care for blacks? HARDLY!

Liberals? It's fucking South Carolina you retard.

We have liberals here. CHarleston has be ran by a Democratic Mayor for almost 40 years. WE've had Democratic Governors. It's fucking Democracy you retard.


Btw, I didn't read this. I see Eugeneics in the title. THe USA was involved with that in the early 20th century. Nothing new.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Can I use this post in the next D1B Catholic thread?

andy7171 wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Can I use this post in the next D1B Catholic thread?

Dear God, please do.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

It's called being a good "Progressive".

catamount man wrote:

D1B wrote:
Liberals? It's **** South Carolina you retard.

Read the large print oh rider of the short bus. NORTH CAROLINA. The eugenics lovers, followers, founders and pushers are all, were, LIBERAL MINDED FUCKS. And you people rail on conservatives for being war mongers. STERILIZATION? SERIOUSLY? D1B, go fuck yourself. you're a load that should've been swallowed.

Which political party controlled the legislature that enacted the law, you deranged redneck?

Baldy wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

It's called being a good "Progressive".

andy7171 wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Can I use this post in the next D1B Catholic thread?

More excuses from the pedophile protectors. Your church continues to lie and hide pedophiles. You support them too.

Grizalltheway wrote:

catamount man wrote:
Read the large print oh rider of the short bus. NORTH CAROLINA. The eugenics lovers, followers, founders and pushers are all, were, LIBERAL MINDED FUCKS. And you people rail on conservatives for being war mongers. STERILIZATION? SERIOUSLY? D1B, go fuck yourself. you're a load that should've been swallowed.

Which political party controlled the legislature that enacted the law, you deranged redneck?

Eugenics cannot be defended GATW .... however, we are forgetting that 30 States other than North Carolina enacted Eugenics laws. Were all 30 of those states run by Democrats?

Also, we are forgetting the Buck v Bell 8-1 supreme court decision that validated eugenics laws.

Those Justices in the Majority: Chief Justice William Howard Taft (R), Oliver Wendell Holmes (R), Willis Van Devanter (R), James Clark McReynold (Conservative/Anti Semite), Louis Brandeis (R), George Sutherland (R), Harlan F. Stone (R), Edward Terry Sanford (R).

Those Justices in the Minority: Pierce Butler (D)


How's that for ya, SH?

JMU DJ wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Which political party controlled the legislature that enacted the law, you deranged redneck?

Eugenics cannot be defended GATW .... however, we are forgetting that 30 States other than North Carolina enacted Eugenics laws. Were all 30 of those states run by Democrats?

Also, we are forgetting the Buck v Bell 8-1 supreme court decision that validated eugenics laws.

Those Justices in the Majority: Chief Justice William Howard Taft (R), Oliver Wendell Holmes (R), Willis Van Devanter (R), James Clark McReynold (Conservative/Anti Semite), Louis Brandeis (R), George Sutherland (R), Harlan F. Stone (R), Edward Terry Sanford (R).

Those Justices in the Minority: Pierce Butler (D)


How's that for ya, SH?

Of course not, and that wasn't my intention at all. Just wanted to call out catmounter for laying the blame for these heinous laws completely on liberals.

Grizalltheway wrote:

JMU DJ wrote:

Eugenics cannot be defended GATW .... however, we are forgetting that 30 States other than North Carolina enacted Eugenics laws. Were all 30 of those states run by Democrats?

Also, we are forgetting the Buck v Bell 8-1 supreme court decision that validated eugenics laws.

Those Justices in the Majority: Chief Justice William Howard Taft (R), Oliver Wendell Holmes (R), Willis Van Devanter (R), James Clark McReynold (Conservative/Anti Semite), Louis Brandeis (R), George Sutherland (R), Harlan F. Stone (R), Edward Terry Sanford (R).

Those Justices in the Minority: Pierce Butler (D)


How's that for ya, SH?

Of course not, and that wasn't my intention at all. Just wanted to call out catmounter for laying the blame for these heinous laws completely on liberals.

Yeah, that is totally bogus. Both parties gave a level of support.

Grizalltheway wrote:

catamount man wrote:
Read the large print oh rider of the short bus. NORTH CAROLINA. The eugenics lovers, followers, founders and pushers are all, were, LIBERAL MINDED ****. And you people rail on conservatives for being war mongers. STERILIZATION? SERIOUSLY? D1B, go **** yourself. you're a load that should've been swallowed.

Which political party controlled the legislature that enacted the law, you deranged redneck?

Democrats did. NC is under Republican legislative control now for the first time in a century.

AshevilleApp wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Which political party controlled the legislature that enacted the law, you deranged redneck?

Democrats did. NC is under Republican legislative control now for the first time in a century.

Strom Thurmond Democrats or liberals?

kalm wrote:

AshevilleApp wrote:

Democrats did. NC is under Republican legislative control now for the first time in a century.

Strom Thurmond Democrats or liberals?

I never said liberals.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

...as soon as you stop trying to get mileage out of Nixon.

travelinman67 wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

...as soon as you stop trying to get mileage out of Nixon.

Nixon would be to the left of Obama.

travelinman67 wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

...as soon as you stop trying to get mileage out of Nixon.

mileage out of nixon? other than pointing out that his "southern strategy" is still being used TODAY by the right... when the hell have I ever done anything of the sort?

CitadelGrad wrote:

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:why exactly do modern day liberals have to defend this exactly?

it's from 40 fing years ago.

Has liberalism really changed that much in 40 years? I can think of a number of liberal members of the House and Senate who began their political careers 40 or even more years ago. Ted Kennedy was elected to the Senate almost 50 years ago and would still be there had he not died of brain cancer less than two years ago.

Liberalism has changed enormously in the last 40 years ago.

Forty years ago liberalism was about leveling the playing field to give people chance for the education and opportunity to achieve whatever outcome they had the desire, talents, and perseverance to achieve.

Today liberalism is about making the outcome equal no matter what efforts, talents and perseverance the individual is willing to put forth to achieve success.