Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

reading. Check this one out.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-10-19.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Say whatever you want about AC, but this is spot on. The OWS protests won't accomplish anything except drain city resources with police overtime. Do most of them know that Obma got more money from Goldman Sachs, Citi Group, and BofA than McCain? Probably not, and they'll vote donk anyway because they'll fall for the "democrats represent people, republicans represent fat cats" canard.

No, she doesn't.

Sounds like what establishment writers have been writing for centuries.

Sorry Ann, but dumb, ugly and hateful is no way to go thru life

Every WEEK Ann Coulter writes something worth reading

Though I can understand why libs don't think so since she points out their hypocrisy so well.

It doesnt take an Ann Coulter to see the obvious fraud when it comes to the OWS crowd.

bulldog10jw wrote:Every WEEK Ann Coulter writes something worth reading

Though I can understand why libs don't think so since she points out their hypocrisy so well.

Ann Coulter is a stupid bitch.

Vidav wrote:

bulldog10jw wrote:Every WEEK Ann Coulter writes something worth reading

Though I can understand why libs don't think so since she points out their hypocrisy so well.

Ann Coulter is a stupid bitch.

And most conks I know agree.

I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

What columnist/author IS helping anyone and solving problems ?

Pwns wrote:reading. Check this one out.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-10-19.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Say whatever you want about AC, but this is spot on. The OWS protests won't accomplish anything except drain city resources with police overtime. Do most of them know that Obma got more money from Goldman Sachs, Citi Group, and BofA than McCain? Probably not, and they'll vote donk anyway because they'll fall for the "democrats represent people, republicans represent fat cats" canard.

It's not that they're falling for your canard, it's that they understand that half of your canard is true.

Sort of like Chris Rock's take on the baddest mofos in prison: the whites, because you know they're guilty.

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...

bulldog10jw wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

What columnist/author IS helping anyone and solving problems ?

Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.

Coulter just attacks libs and blames them for everything. The only person who benefits from this is Ann Coulter. The libs who protest her are wasting their time, just like the conks who listen to her.

houndawg wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...

I don't doubt it. Like I said, I think her routine is schtick, even she doesn't believe the stuff she says; but she gets others riled up.

BlueHen86 wrote:
Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.

Coulter just attacks libs and blames them for everything. The only person who benefits from this is Ann Coulter. The libs who protest her are wasting their time, just like the conks who listen to her.

Letting people know that libs are responsible for everything bad is not trying to raise awareness?

If you think someone is funny and entertaining are you really wasting your time?

bulldog10jw wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.

Coulter just attacks libs and blames them for everything. The only person who benefits from this is Ann Coulter. The libs who protest her are wasting their time, just like the conks who listen to her.

Letting people know that libs are responsible for everything bad is not trying to raise awareness?

If you think someone is funny and entertaining are you really wasting your time?

If you're watching her for the laughs, you are not wasting your time.
But there are some people who take her seriously, and they are wasting their time.

houndawg wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...

I call bullshit!

First, I'll wager a sizable sum you were blazing and every lamp post you saw looked like a skinny blonde.

Second, even if it was human, we're talking SJSU...back in the early 80's there were thousands of skinny dyed blondes.

Rip her all you like, but she's absolutely right about Soros.

houndawg wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.

I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...

I question your judgment as well as your eyesight.

Ivytalk wrote:Rip her all you like, but she's absolutely right about Soros.

Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Rip her all you like, but she's absolutely right about Soros.

Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.

The protesters' refusal to acknowledge Wall Street's bankrolling of the Obama campaign is equally confusing.

CID1990 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...

I question your judgment as well as your eyesight.

CitadelGrad wrote:

kalm wrote:
Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.

The protesters' refusal to acknowledge Wall Street's bankrolling of the Obama campaign is equally confusing.

They haven't?