Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Just giving all the evolution pussies (looking at you D1B) a chance to brush up before I wax your azz.

That's right bitches, it is on! Part 5! Three days from now, you better bring your best shit. Tick tock.

Oh yeah, by Evolution, I mean we started from the primordial ooze and evolved into all the unique species today.

SeattleGriz wrote:Just giving all the evolution pussies (looking at you D1B) a chance to brush up before I wax your azz.

That's right bitches, it is on! Part 5! Three days from now, you better bring your best shit. Tick tock.

You might be the biggest fucking moron on the planet. Go fuck yourself.

Just a warm up, but how exactly is it scientific that the geologic column, or lack thereof, can be included in any discussion when the presupposition of said column is based upon evolution?

Circular reasoning.

"I believe my findings to be congruent with evolution because I am categorizing those findings based on my beliefs in evolution."

D1B wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Just giving all the evolution pussies (looking at you D1B) a chance to brush up before I wax your azz.

That's right bitches, it is on! Part 5! Three days from now, you better bring your best shit. Tick tock.

You might be the biggest fucking moron on the planet. Go fuck yourself.

Welcome my primate brother! Glad you joined, for you at least have some good points.

D1B wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Just giving all the evolution pussies (looking at you D1B) a chance to brush up before I wax your azz.

That's right bitches, it is on! Part 5! Three days from now, you better bring your best shit. Tick tock.

You might be the biggest fucking moron on the planet. Go fuck yourself.

Oh yeah, go fuck yourself, and I ain't talking the usual self pleasure mode you usually use.

Bring it on monkey man!!!

So? How did it happen? What exactly are you suggesting? Let's see some specifics, and I want it supported by empirical data, not the ramblings of some first century nut living in a cave.

death dealer wrote:So? How did it happen? What exactly are you suggesting? Let's see some specifics, and I want it supported by empirical data, not the ramblings of some first century nut living in a cave.

God put us here, as we are. It's only a coincidence that we are similiar to other animals. We shared this land and survived whilst living amongst Dinosaurs and going through Ice Ages that no other land animal could tolerate and withstand. Your science is the Devil's work and you're going to hell with all the other scientists, queers, women and Protestants.

Ibanez wrote:God put us here, as we are. It's only a coincidence that we are similiar to other animals. We shared this land and survived whilst living amongst Dinosaurs and going through Ice Ages that no other land animal could tolerate and withstand. Your science is the Devil's work and you're going to hell with all the other scientists, queers, women and Protestants.

Also Jews.

Vidav wrote:

Ibanez wrote:God put us here, as we are. It's only a coincidence that we are similiar to other animals. We shared this land and survived whilst living amongst Dinosaurs and going through Ice Ages that no other land animal could tolerate and withstand. Your science is the Devil's work and you're going to hell with all the other scientists, queers, women and Protestants.

Also Jews.

Of course...can't leave out the Jews.

Vidav wrote:

death dealer wrote:So? How did it happen? What exactly are you suggesting? Let's see some specifics, and I want it supported by empirical data, not the ramblings of some first century nut living in a cave.

+2

Looks like SeaGriz just got back from a conference and is ready to go, better brush up boys.

http://www.nwcreation.net/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ibanez wrote:

Vidav wrote:
Also Jews.

Of course...can't leave out the Jews.

See if I come to you're guys defense now, when Dana is pounding you all a new mudhole.

JMU DJ wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
Of course...can't leave out the Jews.

See if I come to you're guys defense now, when Dana is pounding you all a new mudhole.

Dude, it's your fault you worship God 1.0. Upgrade to God 2.0 and be saved.

Ibanez wrote:

JMU DJ wrote:

See if I come to you're guys defense now, when Dana is pounding you all a new mudhole.

Dude, it's your fault you worship God 1.0. Upgrade to God 2.0 and be saved.

Kickin' it old school hommie, back when me and my boy Jesus (pronounced Hey-zeus) were rollin down the street (on brontosauruses), sippin on gin and juice.

JMU DJ wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
Of course...can't leave out the Jews.

See if I come to you're guys defense now, when Dana is pounding you all a new mudhole.

Exactly. That is why I gave everyone three...now two days to brush up. Didn't think it was fair to blindside anyone.

death dealer wrote:So? How did it happen? What exactly are you suggesting? Let's see some specifics, and I want it supported by empirical data, not the ramblings of some first century nut living in a cave.

How about this one. People who believe that we evolved from primordial ooze often scoff at Creationism because they just can't believe we were created (not saying this is my belief), from nothing. But isn't that exactly what Evolution is proposing, but you throw in time as the catalyst.

Sheer genuis! If only Creationists would have said God slowly created man. There! They are equal!

SeattleGriz wrote:

death dealer wrote:So? How did it happen? What exactly are you suggesting? Let's see some specifics, and I want it supported by empirical data, not the ramblings of some first century nut living in a cave.

How about this one. People who believe that we evolved from primordial ooze often scoff at Creationism because they just can't believe we were created (not saying this is my belief), from nothing. But isn't that exactly what Evolution is proposing, but you throw in time as the catalyst.

Sheer genuis! If only Creationists would have said God slowly created man. There! They are equal!

Umm no.

Creationism is saying that there is some sort of supreme being that created everything, without needing a creator itself. Evolution is proposing that things happened without the intervention of any divine powers.

JMU DJ wrote:

Vidav wrote:

+2

Looks like SeaGriz just got back from a conference and is ready to go, better brush up boys.

http://www.nwcreation.net/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Actually, I just got back from Bible Camp where I learned to be more judgmental (stolen from The Simpsons).

Vidav wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:
How about this one. People who believe that we evolved from primordial ooze often scoff at Creationism because they just can't believe we were created (not saying this is my belief), from nothing. But isn't that exactly what Evolution is proposing, but you throw in time as the catalyst.

Sheer genuis! If only Creationists would have said God slowly created man. There! They are equal!

Umm no.

Creationism is saying that there is some sort of supreme being that created everything, without needing a creator itself. Evolution is proposing that things happened without the intervention of any divine powers.

Exactly, abiogenesis. Something from nothing...but done really slowly. The math to even get something like that off the ground is mind boggling.

Figure I should throw this in early in the thread.

I don't know how we came to be on this Earth, but I tend to lean toward Intelligent Design.

I started this thread to have a fun discussion amongst CS.com members over what I believe to be the shortcomings of Evolution. As always, my line of attack will be to try and poke holes in Evolution and point out the many assumptions that have to be made to support that theory.

Not a bad movie. Some funny parts.

SeattleGriz wrote:Figure I should throw this in early in the thread.

I don't know how we came to be on this Earth, but I tend to lean toward Intelligent Design.

I started this thread to have a fun discussion amongst CS.com members over what I believe to be the shortcomings of Evolution. As always, my line of attack will be to try and poke holes in Evolution and point out the many assumptions that have to be made to support that theory.

Vidav wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Figure I should throw this in early in the thread.

I don't know how we came to be on this Earth, but I tend to lean toward Intelligent Design.

I started this thread to have a fun discussion amongst CS.com members over what I believe to be the shortcomings of Evolution. As always, my line of attack will be to try and poke holes in Evolution and point out the many assumptions that have to be made to support that theory.

Why do you believe Intelligent Design is coffee worthy?

SeattleGriz wrote:

Vidav wrote:

Why do you believe Intelligent Design is coffee worthy?

The combination of saying that you will point out the many assumptions that have to be made in evolution but saying you lean toward intelligent design. ID requires one to make many assumptions. That is why I bolded both sections.

Vidav wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:
Why do you believe Intelligent Design is coffee worthy?

The combination of saying that you will point out the many assumptions that have to be made in evolution but saying you lean toward intelligent design. ID requires one to make many assumptions. That is why I bolded both sections.

Agreed, and that is why I can only attack Evolution, for I know there is no way to prove any one theory.