Sometimes we need to be reminded...
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:29 pm
...that Bachmann and Palin aren't the most batshit crazy Republican women.
[youtube][/youtube]
Holy shit.
[youtube][/youtube]
Holy shit.
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25440
Today is the day I became a huge fan of Piers Morgan. Just very cool and collected, and I like the little smirk he had because I feel like he was almost enjoying the interview. Great job, will definitely have to watch more of him.
SuperHornet wrote: witch (with a "B")
Agreed. I've already tivo'ed up his next show...DJH wrote:What the hell?
Love how Morgan was so cool throughout the whole thing. He's gonna come out of this with a lot of extra popularity for sure.
She a republican party favorite and Z and the rest of conks would vote for her in a second.Grizalltheway wrote:She's a real bunt (with a "C").
That was great!AZGrizFan wrote:"I think we now know why it's called "Trouble Maker""![]()
![]()
She's a republican party favorite? Hasn't she run for senate 4-5 times and failed every single time?D1B wrote:She a republican party favorite and Z and the rest of conks would vote for her in a second.Grizalltheway wrote:She's a real bunt (with a "C").
D1B wrote:She a republican party favorite and Z and the rest of conks would vote for her in a second.Grizalltheway wrote:She's a real bunt (with a "C").
JohnStOnge wrote:There wasn't anything "batshit crazy" about that at all.
JohnStOnge wrote:I think what you probably saw there was one of those situations in which someone is invited on for an interview and given a false impression as to what was going to happen. There wasn't anything "crazy" about what she did.
Just what is it that you guys think was "crazy" about what she did?
She getting interviewed and instead of answering a simple question (could it even be considered a yes or no question?) she went on an illogical rant about him being rude, when all he was doing was asking a question. She said it herself, she wasn't running for office or anything, so why couldn't she give a simple response to a question that she would probably be animate about on the campaign trail? She seems of the entitled nature to meJohnStOnge wrote:I think what you probably saw there was one of those situations in which someone is invited on for an interview and given a false impression as to what was going to happen. There wasn't anything "crazy" about what she did.
Just what is it that you guys think was "crazy" about what she did?
She's just a raging bitch at heart. Seriously, you go on a talk show SPECIFICALLY to plug some sorry excuse for a book you've just written, then you get all pissy when asked about something you've written in said book? Fuckin' joke.AZGrizFan wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:I think what you probably saw there was one of those situations in which someone is invited on for an interview and given a false impression as to what was going to happen. There wasn't anything "crazy" about what she did.
Just what is it that you guys think was "crazy" about what she did?
John, no journalist worth a shit would allow someone to "preapprove" their line of questioning. She thought she was going to get lobbed softballs, and he wanted to talk about something else. It's not like her position on the topic is "secret"....christ, she's written about it in her book! Why wouldn't she just answer the question and move on?
Answer: Because she's batshit crazy.
Skjellyfetti wrote:...that Bachmann and Palin aren't the most batshit crazy Republican women.
[youtube][/youtube]
Holy ****.
GATW, you wish your head was buried in her muff.Grizalltheway wrote:She's just a raging bitch at heart. Seriously, you go on a talk show SPECIFICALLY to plug some sorry excuse for a book you've just written, then you get all pissy when asked about something you've written in said book? ****' joke.AZGrizFan wrote:
John, no journalist worth a **** would allow someone to "preapprove" their line of questioning. She thought she was going to get lobbed softballs, and he wanted to talk about something else. It's not like her position on the topic is "secret"....christ, she's written about it in her book! Why wouldn't she just answer the question and move on?
Answer: Because she's batshit crazy.
Sez you, Barney Frank.houndawg wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:...that Bachmann and Palin aren't the most batshit crazy Republican women.
[youtube][/youtube]
Holy ****.
Dayum. No wonder so many Republicans are gay.
Thinking she's a bitch doesn't preclude such things.Ivytalk wrote:GATW, you wish your head was buried in her muff.Grizalltheway wrote:
She's just a raging bitch at heart. Seriously, you go on a talk show SPECIFICALLY to plug some sorry excuse for a book you've just written, then you get all pissy when asked about something you've written in said book? ****' joke.