Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Couldn't hear the audio on this hotel computer but, obviously, Somalia is not run by a Libertarian government. Libertarianism is not anarchy. Libertarians have no objection to having a government that enforces laws prohibiting direct attacks by individuals against others.

Libertarianism may hold that a person should not be arrested for smoking pot or utilizing a prostitute. But it does not hold that a person should not be arrested, tried, convicted, and penalized for breaking into someone else's house to steal a TV, murdering someone else, robbing someone else at gunpoint, etc.

Somalia is not Libertarianism at all. In one sense it's anarchy. In another sense it is a collection of small, relatively informal dictatorships. A series of extremely repressive and authoritarian little "governments."

Holy Hyperbole Batman. Thank you JSO, couldn't have said it any better.

JohnStOnge wrote:Couldn't hear the audio on this hotel computer but, obviously, Somalia is not run by a Libertarian government. Libertarianism is not anarchy. Libertarians have no objection to having a government that enforces laws prohibiting direct attacks by individuals against others.

Libertarianism may hold that a person should not be arrested for smoking pot or utilizing a prostitute. But it does not hold that a person should not be arrested, tried, convicted, and penalized for breaking into someone else's house to steal a TV, murdering someone else, robbing someone else at gunpoint, etc.

Somalia is not Libertarianism at all. In one sense it's anarchy. In another sense it is a collection of small, relatively informal dictatorships. A series of extremely repressive and authoritarian little "governments."

And the fact that boR would equate Somalia to a Libertarian's idea of effective government speaks to just how far removed from reality most far lefties are.

AZGrizFan wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:Couldn't hear the audio on this hotel computer but, obviously, Somalia is not run by a Libertarian government. Libertarianism is not anarchy. Libertarians have no objection to having a government that enforces laws prohibiting direct attacks by individuals against others.

Libertarianism may hold that a person should not be arrested for smoking pot or utilizing a prostitute. But it does not hold that a person should not be arrested, tried, convicted, and penalized for breaking into someone else's house to steal a TV, murdering someone else, robbing someone else at gunpoint, etc.

Somalia is not Libertarianism at all. In one sense it's anarchy. In another sense it is a collection of small, relatively informal dictatorships. A series of extremely repressive and authoritarian little "governments."

And the fact that boR would equate Somalia to a Libertarian's idea of effective government speaks to just how far removed from reality most far lefties are.

McCain could not have picked a better VP candidate than Sarah Palin AZgrizFan, Summer 2008

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And the fact that boR would equate Somalia to a Libertarian's idea of effective government speaks to just how far removed from reality most far lefties are.

McCain could not have picked a better VP candidate than Sarah Palin AZgrizFan, Summer 2008

Leave it to Douche1Bag to make a comment totally unrelated to the discussion at hand.

In four posts, he'll have this converted to a thread about religion bashing.

Jesus was a hippie.

JohnStOnge wrote:Couldn't hear the audio on this hotel computer but, obviously, Somalia is not run by a Libertarian government. Libertarianism is not anarchy. Libertarians have no objection to having a government that enforces laws prohibiting direct attacks by individuals against others.

Libertarianism may hold that a person should not be arrested for smoking pot or utilizing a prostitute. But it does not hold that a person should not be arrested, tried, convicted, and penalized for breaking into someone else's house to steal a TV, murdering someone else, robbing someone else at gunpoint, etc.

Somalia is not Libertarianism at all. In one sense it's anarchy. In another sense it is a collection of small, relatively informal dictatorships. A series of extremely repressive and authoritarian little "governments."

It must be really tough for libertarians to live in the U.S. what with all the benefits of big government they receive.

Somalia is exactly what a perfectly libertarian system would look like.

kalm wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:Couldn't hear the audio on this hotel computer but, obviously, Somalia is not run by a Libertarian government. Libertarianism is not anarchy. Libertarians have no objection to having a government that enforces laws prohibiting direct attacks by individuals against others.

Libertarianism may hold that a person should not be arrested for smoking pot or utilizing a prostitute. But it does not hold that a person should not be arrested, tried, convicted, and penalized for breaking into someone else's house to steal a TV, murdering someone else, robbing someone else at gunpoint, etc.

Somalia is not Libertarianism at all. In one sense it's anarchy. In another sense it is a collection of small, relatively informal dictatorships. A series of extremely repressive and authoritarian little "governments."

It must be really tough for libertarians to live in the U.S. what with all the benefits of big government they receive.

Somalia is exactly what a perfectly libertarian system would look like.

ARen't you the same guy who attached your wagon to JBB?

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
It must be really tough for libertarians to live in the U.S. what with all the benefits of big government they receive.

Somalia is exactly what a perfectly libertarian system would look like.

ARen't you the same guy who attached your wagon to JBB?

It was your mensa friend, it was one thread, and I laughed at his use of satire that went right over your head.

kalm wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:


ARen't you the same guy who attached your wagon to JBB?

It was your mensa friend, it was one thread, and I laughed at his use of satire that went right over your head.

That's right. First you attach your wagon to Mr. 6.93, now this crap?

People are judged by the company they keep...

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
It was your mensa friend, it was one thread, and I laughed at his use of satire that went right over your head.

That's right. First you attach your wagon to Mr. 6.93, now this crap?

People are judged by the company they keep...

And who's company am I keeping in this thread? Joseph Stiglitz? John Kenneth Galbraith? Adam Smith?

Can I then judge you based on SH? JBB? You probably agree with their politics 93.6 % of the time.

def. "This Thread": Lunatic fringe Rob gets owned in the first response, and the Defenders-of-the-Fringe dive in to hijack and divert attention from his defeat.

S.O.P.

Next...













...Rob equates Venzuela's cultural renaissance to the Ottoman Empire.

kalm wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote: That's right. First you attach your wagon to Mr. 6.93, now this crap?

People are judged by the company they keep...

And who's company am I keeping in this thread? Joseph Stiglitz? John Kenneth Galbraith? Adam Smith?

Can I then judge you based on SH? JBB? You probably agree with their politics 93.6 % of the time.

Nice try, OB.

Rob,
where are the tits

OL FU wrote:Rob,
where are the tits

Rob's a true progressive...

...he'd never profit from the objectification of women.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
And who's company am I keeping in this thread? Joseph Stiglitz? John Kenneth Galbraith? Adam Smith?

Can I then judge you based on SH? JBB? You probably agree with their politics 93.6 % of the time.

Nice try, OB.

Nice rebuttal.

Grizalltheway wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:


Nice try, OB.

Nice rebuttal.

Yeah that was a pretty good one...for Z.

kalm wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Nice rebuttal.

Yeah that was a pretty good one...for Z.

Sorry, I just think it's hilarious the folks/issues you decide to back the loons on.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
Yeah that was a pretty good one...for Z.

Sorry, I just think it's hilarious the folks/issues you decide to back the loons on.

Let's not forget that you were once united with SH in your love for Ms. Palin.

Grizalltheway wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Sorry, I just think it's hilarious the folks/issues you decide to back the loons on.

Let's not forget that you were once united with SH in your love for Ms. Palin.

That's soooo 2008.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Let's not forget that you were once united with SH in your love for Ms. Palin.

That's soooo 2008.