Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Iranian youth are having fun, and risking their lives at the same time...using squirt guns...

Using various social media...they are organizing water gun fights...

Iranian students, who've used protests, boycotts and sit-ins, have found a new and innovative way to express their disenchantment against the oppressive rule of the mullahs-- the water gun fight.

After last week’s large-scale water fight in Tehran resulted in the rounding-up and arrests of young participants, students are now preparing to once again take on the theocratic regime by organizing another water fight this weekend, and could set off a ripple effect of other water fights in the future.

Almost 1,000 young Iranians gathered on a hot summer day at Abo Atash Park in Tehran last Friday, at an event organized on Facebook, called “Tehran’s Water Gun Fight,” which invited young Iranians to bring water guns, bottles, and any other water games to the park.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/08/05 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The government has grossly over-reacted in typical fashion, and is warning any future water-gun fights will be met with a serious crackdown

This is a warning to young people that we will not accept these types of organized activities and unacceptable behavior anywhere in our country,” the head of Tehran's morality police, Ahmad Roozbehani said about the arrests.

Those who participated in last week’s water fight said hejabs, or the Islamic headscarves, on the females in attendance had either fallen off or moved back, revealing the hairline.

The comfort with which males and females interacted, in a country where gender segregation exists is all aspects of life, also irked authorities.

Confirming the arrests, city police chief Hossein Sajedinia placed fault on participants for acting "abnormally" and going against Islamic values.

With 70% of the Iranian population under 35 years of age, I think its just a matter of time before the revolution of the late 70's is overthrown by a revolution of the young...

We are not all that different.....we throw our young people down violently and arrest them for dancing at the JEFFERSON Memorial.

Col Hogan wrote:Iranian youth are having fun, and risking their lives at the same time...using squirt guns...

Using various social media...they are organizing water gun fights...

Iranian students, who've used protests, boycotts and sit-ins, have found a new and innovative way to express their disenchantment against the oppressive rule of the mullahs-- the water gun fight.

After last week’s large-scale water fight in Tehran resulted in the rounding-up and arrests of young participants, students are now preparing to once again take on the theocratic regime by organizing another water fight this weekend, and could set off a ripple effect of other water fights in the future.

Almost 1,000 young Iranians gathered on a hot summer day at Abo Atash Park in Tehran last Friday, at an event organized on Facebook, called “Tehran’s Water Gun Fight,” which invited young Iranians to bring water guns, bottles, and any other water games to the park.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/08/05 ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The government has grossly over-reacted in typical fashion, and is warning any future water-gun fights will be met with a serious crackdown

This is a warning to young people that we will not accept these types of organized activities and unacceptable behavior anywhere in our country,” the head of Tehran's morality police, Ahmad Roozbehani said about the arrests.

Those who participated in last week’s water fight said hejabs, or the Islamic headscarves, on the females in attendance had either fallen off or moved back, revealing the hairline.

The comfort with which males and females interacted, in a country where gender segregation exists is all aspects of life, also irked authorities.

Confirming the arrests, city police chief Hossein Sajedinia placed fault on participants for acting "abnormally" and going against Islamic values.

With 70% of the Iranian population under 35 years of age, I think its just a matter of time before the revolution of the late 70's is overthrown by a revolution of the young...

Religion.

Religion

There you go putting all religions in the same basket again.

citdog wrote:We are not all that different.....we throw our young people down violently and arrest them for dancing at the JEFFERSON Memorial.

You know, I will say that one has to wonder why we have rules saying people have to wear clothes in public at all. I mean, I certainly would anyway. But why make it illegal to run around naked?

In some cases there may be public health reasons for requiring that certain parts of the body be covered so as not to contaminate something. But, as a general matter, I'd have to say that the Iranian aversion to letting people show certain parts of their body is just more...well..."comprehensive" than our own. We do get pretty twisted up over people showing certain parts of their body. Like, is it all THAT much less rational to say a woman shouldn't show here hairline than it is to say that she can't walk mow the grass in her front yard without a shirt on?

In both cases people are getting in a wad over a woman showing a part of her body they think shouldn't be shown in public.

JohnStOnge wrote:

citdog wrote:We are not all that different.....we throw our young people down violently and arrest them for dancing at the JEFFERSON Memorial.

You know, I will say that one has to wonder why we have rules saying people have to wear clothes in public at all. I mean, I certainly would anyway. But why make it illegal to run around naked?

In some cases there may be public health reasons for requiring that certain parts of the body be covered so as not to contaminate something. But, as a general matter, I'd have to say that the Iranian aversion to letting people show certain parts of their body is just more...well..."comprehensive" than our own. We do get pretty twisted up over people showing certain parts of their body. Like, is it all THAT much less rational to say a woman shouldn't show here hairline than it is to say that she can't walk mow the grass in her front yard without a shirt on?

In both cases people are getting in a wad over a woman showing a part of her body they think shouldn't be shown in public.

So now that your other message board is closed (where pedophiles swap pictures and videos), are we going to see more of you now?

So now that your other message board is closed (where pedophiles swap pictures and videos), are we going to see more of you now?

I thought about whether I should even respond to something like that or not and decided I should. I never even heard of the message board you're talking about until I heard something on the news about people getting busted for it. And what I've been trying to make you and others understand, apparently without success in at least some cases, is that one sexually mature member of a dioecious species being attracted to a sexually mature member of the opposite sex of the same species is not pedophilia. Like this for example:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/connecticut-ba ... d=14238187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That is not an instance of pedophilia

Now, you can persist in failing to understand that. But by doing so you will only be showing your own lack of understanding of animal sexuality.

To answer your question: My activity here depends on many factors. But over time it should remain roughly the same unless this site starts getting too up tight like the "other" FCS site did.

By the way, check out this quote from the article on the babysitter having sex with the 14 year old guy:

"'t's very difficult for a 14-year-old boy to make decisions about sex and the decision shouldn't be imposed on him by someone who is significantly older."

Please. Oh yeah. It was SO difficult. I was a 14 year old boy once. I know better.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Religion

There you go putting all religions in the same basket again.

Absolutely, but there's only 3 in the basket: christianity, Islam and Judaism. The big three suck dick and need to go.

JohnStOnge wrote:

So now that your other message board is closed (where pedophiles swap pictures and videos), are we going to see more of you now?

I thought about whether I should even respond to something like that or not and decided I should. I never even heard of the message board you're talking about until I heard something on the news about people getting busted for it. And what I've been trying to make you and others understand, apparently without success in at least some cases, is that one sexually mature member of a dioecious species being attracted to a sexually mature member of the opposite sex of the same species is not pedophilia. Like this for example:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/connecticut-ba ... d=14238187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That is not an instance of pedophilia

Now, you can persist in failing to understand that. But by doing so you will only be showing your own lack of understanding of animal sexuality.

To answer your question: My activity here depends on many factors. But over time it should remain roughly the same unless this site starts getting too up tight like the "other" FCS site did.

So you support Warren Jeff's right to fuck 13 year olds?