Page 1 of 1

Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:28 am
by 93henfan
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/05 ... sco-ballot
(JTA) -- A measure seeking to ban male circumcision will appear on the November ballot in San Francisco.

More than 7,700 signatures from city residents on a petition in support of the measure were approved as valid by city officials on Wednesday. At least 7,168 signatures were required, and more than 12,000 were submitted.

The measure, which would apply only in the city of San Francisco, would make it a misdemeanor crime to circumcise a boy before he is 18 years old. The maximum penalty would be a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. Circumcisions would be permitted only for medical reasons, with no religious exemptions.

Even if the measure passes in November, it likely would be challenged as a constitutional violation of freedom of religion.

“This is a tradition not only practiced by Jews, but by Muslims and members of secular society,” Rabbi Yosef Langer, director of Chabad-Lubavitch of San Francisco, said. “The Jewish people and spiritually conscious people all over the world will certainly -- and have always -- risen to the occasion so that justice, and the will of the Almighty, will prevail.”

The Anti-Defamation League and the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council have come out against the proposal.

Jewish boys traditionally are circumcised at eight days of age and Muslims at some time during boyhood.

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 10:18 am
by dbackjon
Unconstitutional

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 10:21 am
by Vidav
If your religious practices involved severing the left hand of all female infants and a law was passed banning that, would it also be unconstitutional? :coffee:

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 10:41 am
by Baldy
93henfan wrote:http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/05 ... sco-ballot
(JTA) -- A measure seeking to ban male circumcision will appear on the November ballot in San Francisco.

More than 7,700 signatures from city residents on a petition in support of the measure were approved as valid by city officials on Wednesday. At least 7,168 signatures were required, and more than 12,000 were submitted.

The measure, which would apply only in the city of San Francisco, would make it a misdemeanor crime to circumcise a boy before he is 18 years old. The maximum penalty would be a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. Circumcisions would be permitted only for medical reasons, with no religious exemptions.

Even if the measure passes in November, it likely would be challenged as a constitutional violation of freedom of religion.

“This is a tradition not only practiced by Jews, but by Muslims and members of secular society,” Rabbi Yosef Langer, director of Chabad-Lubavitch of San Francisco, said. “The Jewish people and spiritually conscious people all over the world will certainly -- and have always -- risen to the occasion so that justice, and the will of the Almighty, will prevail.”

The Anti-Defamation League and the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council have come out against the proposal.

Jewish boys traditionally are circumcised at eight days of age and Muslims at some time during boyhood.
:lol: @ San Francisco

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 1:42 pm
by D1B
Fucking religious bullshit. Does god really care about that shit?

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:58 pm
by blueballs
Well there's one thing for sure... Tim Tebow won't be signing or being traded to the 49'ers anytime soon.

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 6:00 pm
by citdog
let us all just face the fact that nothing looks good wearing a turtleneck.

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:21 pm
by Skjellyfetti
citdog wrote:let us all just face the fact that nothing looks good wearing a turtleneck.
Image

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:26 pm
by citdog
Skjellyfetti wrote:
citdog wrote:let us all just face the fact that nothing looks good wearing a turtleneck.
Image
she would look better without it

Re: Hey CITDOG!

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:51 pm
by Baldy
citdog wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote: Image
she would look better without it
:rimshot:

:rofl:

Well played... :clap: :clap: :clap: