Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/25/ ... tml?hpt=C2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Yawn.

Must be true then

The science is settled

"According to a poll just released today, President Obama’s approval rating is at an all-time low.

He’s so unpopular right now, the people in Kenya are accusing him of being born in the United States .”
Jay Leno

Good. perhaps now we as a nation can put this wild goosechase to bed once and for all and shift our collective focus back to his policies and actions as president which are destroying our economy and standing in the world.

That having been said, I wonder if it was a conservative who was being questioned if CNN would have taken three+ years to "investigate" it, or would this have happened during the campaign?

UNHWildCats wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/25/ ... tml?hpt=C2

I'd hate to see this rumor die.

Heh.

I like Birthers. They have the same effect on liberals as when Bush used to say "NOO KA LER".

The nuts are the ones who keep thing entertaining in such troubling times.

What next, "Maddow: Obama Absolutely the Risen Christ"?

Pat Buchanan: MSNBC, Media Helping Obama "Conceal" Records
realclearpolitics.com/video ^ | April 26, 2011 | realclearpolitics.com/video

In yet another segment where he is double-teamed by two liberals, Pat Buchanan defends why he is skeptical of President Obama's past. "I'll tell you what. He went to Occidental College then suddenly he ends up at one of the best schools in the country, Columbia. He vaults from there to Harvard Law School. Suddenly he's on the Harvard Law Review. We've never seen any grades of the guy. These are legitimate questions," Buchanan said.


Key quote: Pat Buchanan to Chris Matthews: "You're supposed to be a journalist."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


I wonder if they''ll do any research on the conservative candidate?

Bronco, we don't even need to dig into his past. He's showing that he's even more incompetent than Bush.

Bronco wrote:Pat Buchanan: MSNBC, Media Helping Obama "Conceal" Records
realclearpolitics.com/video ^ | April 26, 2011 | realclearpolitics.com/video

In yet another segment where he is double-teamed by two liberals, Pat Buchanan defends why he is skeptical of President Obama's past. "I'll tell you what. He went to Occidental College then suddenly he ends up at one of the best schools in the country, Columbia. He vaults from there to Harvard Law School. Suddenly he's on the Harvard Law Review. We've never seen any grades of the guy. These are legitimate questions," Buchanan said.


Key quote: Pat Buchanan to Chris Matthews: "You're supposed to be a journalist."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


I wonder if they''ll do any research on the conservative candidate?

Ol' Suckerpunch hasn't seen Obama's grades? Something fishy here.....

89Hen wrote:Bronco, we don't even need to dig into his past. He's showing that he's even more incompetent than Bush.

Nah, he's still one unnecessary war short of equaling Bush's record of miserable failure at everything he touched. He may be trying, but he ain't close yet.

houndawg wrote:

89Hen wrote:Bronco, we don't even need to dig into his past. He's showing that he's even more incompetent than Bush.

Nah, he's still one unnecessary war short of equaling Bush's record of miserable failure at everything he touched. He may be trying, but he ain't close yet.

For you, one of the most Obama dick sucking Liberals to say that, means that he is already past that point.

89Hen wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Nah, he's still one unnecessary war short of equaling Bush's record of miserable failure at everything he touched. He may be trying, but he ain't close yet.

For you, one of the most Obama dick sucking Liberals to say that, means that he is already past that point.

Tut tut now, son, no reason to get pissy.

houndawg wrote:

89Hen wrote: For you, one of the most Obama dick sucking Liberals to say that, means that he is already past that point.

Tut tut now, son, no reason to get pissy.

Stop sucking his dick and I'll stop calling you on it.

89Hen wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Tut tut now, son, no reason to get pissy.

Stop sucking his dick and I'll stop calling you on it.

I don't recall dawg ever doing anything close to that. The fact that he leans left doesn't automatically mean he sucks Obama's dick.

blueballs wrote:Good. perhaps now we as a nation can put this wild goosechase to bed once and for all and shift our collective focus back to his policies and actions as president which are destroying our economy and standing in the world.

That having been said, I wonder if it was a conservative who was being questioned if CNN would have taken three+ years to "investigate" it, or would this have happened during the campaign?

Oh, so NOW conks care about what the rest of the world thinks of us. Where were you circa 2001-2009?

Grizalltheway wrote:The fact that he leans left

Some nice art you created there. You should see if MoMA will buy it.

Grizalltheway wrote:Some nice art you created there. You should see if MoMA will buy it.

There are some folks who don't lean... Jelly and Hound are two of the lefties who don't "lean".

In his Book... “Dreams From My Father,” Obama indicated he hadn’t always been an academic star while admitting to drug use.

What, heavy drug use and not a academic star...that's hard to believe

So when did he become a academic star?

If I became a great student I would be proud to release my grades and it would be an inspirational story for other stoner's.

Bronco wrote:If I became a great student I would be proud to release my grades and it would be an inspirational story for other stoner's.

I know that in this world of social media, everyone always wants to know everything about everyone else, but ya gotta realize that's not how it works. I'm the type that will get a grade back and never say a word, regardless of how well I do. Others will tell the people next to them what they got. Just 'cause you'd be proud to release your grades, it doesn't mean everyone else would. Every citizen, including the president, has a right to privacy.

89Hen wrote:Bronco, we don't even need to dig into his past. He's showing that he's even more incompetent than Bush.

The birthers are complete idiots, and they play right into Obama's hands. Instead of focusing on Obama's Presidential record, they are using their tinfoil caps to deflect attention away to conspiracy BS. If Obama has paperwork that could clear things up, he's better off not releasing it. Let the birther nitwits run interference for him.

Grizalltheway wrote:

blueballs wrote:Good. perhaps now we as a nation can put this wild goosechase to bed once and for all and shift our collective focus back to his policies and actions as president which are destroying our economy and standing in the world.

That having been said, I wonder if it was a conservative who was being questioned if CNN would have taken three+ years to "investigate" it, or would this have happened during the campaign?

Oh, so NOW conks care about what the rest of the world thinks of us. Where were you circa 2001-2009?

That is hilarious. I hope it was meant to be.

Bronco wrote:In his Book... “Dreams From My Father,” Obama indicated he hadn’t always been an academic star while admitting to drug use.

What, heavy drug use and not a academic star...that's hard to believe

So when did he become a academic star?

I don't think you've read the book or you would know the answer to your question.

Though, your first sentence is stated as if you've read the book. Hmmmm.