Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:41 am
by catamount man
including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:53 am
by houndawg
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
Sarah Palin is not the tea party nor is she responsible for this wack job. Arizona breeds wack jobs like Nevada breeds sand fleas.
But you are correct about lots of these so-called tea party people not being thrilled about having a Prez who isn't white, and cloaking their racism behind an alleged distrust of government which, coincidentally, blossomed forth on January 21st,2010.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:06 am
by GSUAlumniEagle
I don't find a whole lot of fault with the "crosshairs" thing. As has been said, people on both sides of the aisle have used similar language and war rhetoric has been a part of politics - again from both sides - for quite some time.
Where I do blame the Right is for their outlandish commentary and hate speech over the past two years. They've labeled every Democrat as someone who wants to come take YOUR! guns. We want to take away YOUR! liberties. They want to destroy YOUR! country. Palin saying that then Senator Obama hates America enough to "pal around" with terrorists. They've literally and figuratively painted the entire Left as haters of America.
So they gave credibility to the extremists. It game lunatics like this guy the mindset that it wasn't wrong to kill anymore -- because it was his way of defending the country from a radical agenda that was destroying it. He was a martyr. He was only defending this country the way the founding fathers. Tree of Liberty and Blood of Tyrants, no?
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:45 am
by native
houndawg wrote:
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
Sarah Palin is not the tea party nor is she responsible for this wack job. Arizona breeds wack jobs like Nevada breeds sand fleas.
But you are correct about lots of these so-called tea party people not being thrilled about having a Prez who isn't white, and cloaking their racism behind an alleged distrust of government which, coincidentally, blossomed forth on January 21st,2010.
Clarence Thomas for President! He is a lot "blacker" than Obama!
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:27 am
by AZGrizFan
native wrote:
houndawg wrote:
Sarah Palin is not the tea party nor is she responsible for this wack job. Arizona breeds wack jobs like Nevada breeds sand fleas.
But you are correct about lots of these so-called tea party people not being thrilled about having a Prez who isn't white, and cloaking their racism behind an alleged distrust of government which, coincidentally, blossomed forth on January 21st,2010.
Clarence Thomas for President! He is a lot "blacker" than Obama!
No shit. Or JC Watts. There's a dozen guys I would vote for in a New York minute and could give a rats ass if they're black. Hell, I could give a rats ass Obama is black. I can't stand his politics.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:36 am
by mainejeff
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:53 am
by AZGrizFan
mainejeff wrote:
Well, if "people" would just stop pissin' us off, there wouldn't be a problem now, would there?
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:13 pm
by mainejeff
AZGrizFan wrote:
mainejeff wrote:
Well, if "people" would just stop pissin' us off, there wouldn't be a problem now, would there?
Keep on killin'. That'll get your side REAL far!
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:16 pm
by BDKJMU
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
Gosh, son, you are a lot dumber than I thought you were.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:22 pm
by catamount man
You name me ONE instance where disgruntled conservatives gathered to speak out against bigger government when Bush was in office and I'll leave this board FOREVER. You can't do it!
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:24 pm
by mainejeff
catamount man wrote:You name me ONE instance where disgruntled conservatives gathered to speak out against bigger government when Bush was in office and I'll leave this board FOREVER. You can't do it!
No, they can't. CONK memory banks only date back to Jan. 21, 2009.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:21 pm
by clenz
mainejeff wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:26 pm
by Pwns
It's really not much different than blaming the Columbine High shooting on video games and Marilyn Manson. Stupid.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:32 pm
by death dealer
clenz wrote:
mainejeff wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?
Good point Clenz. I'd be all for banning Republicans!! But only if we throw in the Democrats too.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:02 pm
by clenz
death dealer wrote:
clenz wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?
Good point Clenz. I'd be all for banning Republicans!! But only if we throw in the Democrats too.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:39 pm
by native
AZGrizFan wrote:
native wrote:
Clarence Thomas for President! He is a lot "blacker" than Obama!
No ****. Or JC Watts. There's a dozen guys I would vote for in a New York minute and could give a rats ass if they're black. Hell, I could give a rats ass Obama is black. I can't stand his politics.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:52 pm
by Skjellyfetti
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
Gabrielle Giffords wasn't fond of Palin putting her in the "crosshairs."
The way that she has it depicted.... has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district... when people do that, you have gotta realize there's consequences to that action.
[youtube][/youtube]
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:55 pm
by native
For goodness' sake, c-man. Please take your meds, boy.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:26 pm
by BDKJMU
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
catamount man wrote:You name me ONE instance where disgruntled conservatives gathered to speak out against bigger government when Bush was in office and I'll leave this board FOREVER. You can't do it!
I suspect you're full of it and will still be posting here.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:29 pm
by native
BDKJMU wrote:
catamount man wrote:including Giffords. Who thinks the ex governor fundamentalist whackjob deserves some blame in this?
I would consider myself a conservative on some issues, liberal on some issues, but where do we draw the line in this nation? Are people truly wanting limited government or is it a bunch of whites just pissed that a negro is President.
The tea partiers can spin it any way they choose, but you didn't hear one iota of their hostility towards Washington until Obama was elected President and I am in no way defending him, but damn America, enough is enough.
catamount man wrote:You name me ONE instance where disgruntled conservatives gathered to speak out against bigger government when Bush was in office and I'll leave this board FOREVER. You can't do it!
I suspect you're full of it and will still be posting here.
Not fair, BD - he said ONE instance...
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:40 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
Pwns wrote:It's really not much different than blaming the Columbine High shooting on video games and Marilyn Manson. Stupid.
Dead on. I really haven't even ventured onto these threads to look at what the board members think on it because I know full well that it's gonna be some anti gun, tea party, bullshit from the idiots that want to have some simple answer for this. I had to see what Cman was putting out there though.
Gotta love that people are trying to find someone to blame for the actions of a lunatic. It's always gotta be someone to be the lightning rod from the other team right?
Did this guy visit the site in question and was he driven to this by it? Yeah, I'm sure that's the fucking answer.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:41 pm
by native
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
Pwns wrote:It's really not much different than blaming the Columbine High shooting on video games and Marilyn Manson. Stupid.
Dead on. I really haven't even ventured onto these threads to look at what the board members think on it because I know full well that it's gonna be some anti gun, tea party, bullshit from the idiots that want to have some simple answer for this. I had to see what Cman was putting out there though.
Gotta love that people are trying to find someone to blame for the actions of a lunatic. It's always gotta be someone to be the lightning rod from the other team right?
Did this guy visit the site in question and was he driven to this by it? Yeah, I'm sure that's the **** answer.
I'll say right here and now that if it turns out that this guy was a leftie, I am not blaming Obama and the Dems for it.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:52 pm
by mainejeff
clenz wrote:
mainejeff wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?
Don't know.......I'd rather ban Republicans.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:08 pm
by Ivytalk
mainejeff wrote:
clenz wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?
Don't know.......I'd rather ban Republicans.
Because you're an incorrigible douchebag.
Re: Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:11 pm
by native
mainejeff wrote:
clenz wrote:
If that is the case why do you/the left want to ban guns?