hey mr. personal responsibility for everyone but yourself...AZGrizFan wrote:It's so easy for a guy with no responsibilities and a Ha-vad degree to pontificate.Cleets Part 2 wrote:
Ahh... Children - yes they are expensive (Stop doing V every night and knocking her up) Jeezus man - are you guys Mormon..?
I can afford them. What I can't afford is fucks like YOU wanting to take MORE and MORE of MY money because people of your ilk are too lazy to actually earn their OWN MONEY.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:hey mr. personal responsibility for everyone but yourself...AZGrizFan wrote:
It's so easy for a guy with no responsibilities and a Ha-vad degree to pontificate.
if you can't afford em... stop making em
simple as that
You..!!! Mr. Tough Talk - were the one pontificating...AZGrizFan wrote:It's so easy for a guy with no responsibilities and a Ha-vad degree to pontificate.Cleets Part 2 wrote:
Ahh... Children - yes they are expensive (Stop doing V every night and knocking her up) Jeezus man - are you guys Mormon..?
I know I know... (but I wanted to fulfill your pontification request) So, because you choose to live simply that means that I have to give more of MY income? Not sure where you're going with this....Cleets Part 2 wrote:You..!!! Mr. Tough Talk - were the one pontificating...AZGrizFan wrote:
It's so easy for a guy with no responsibilities and a Ha-vad degree to pontificate.
And what's all this about "No responsibilities" you sound like my mother...
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
Yes.....how else will they afford to live simply...get with the program AZ....AZGrizFan wrote:So, because you choose to live simply that means that I have to give more of MY income? Not sure where you're going with this....Cleets Part 2 wrote:
You..!!! Mr. Tough Talk - were the one pontificating...
And what's all this about "No responsibilities" you sound like my mother...
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
AZGrizFan wrote:So, because you choose to live simply that means that I have to give more of MY income? Not sure where you're going with this....Cleets Part 2 wrote:
You..!!! Mr. Tough Talk - were the one pontificating...
And what's all this about "No responsibilities" you sound like my mother...
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
rep!Cleets Part 2 wrote:You..!!! Mr. Tough Talk - were the one pontificating...AZGrizFan wrote:
It's so easy for a guy with no responsibilities and a Ha-vad degree to pontificate.
And what's all this about "No responsibilities" you sound like my mother...
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
Hey now. You know that crap is my mothers!!Cleets Part 2 wrote:
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
Oh yeah...SeattleGriz wrote:Hey now. You know that crap is my mothers!!Cleets Part 2 wrote:
Some of us choose to keep our lives simple - some of us do not... I live in 750 square feet, ride my bike as much as I can, I own very little (my possessions are few) I come and go as I choose for the most part...
Some people fill their lives with stuff... including children and houses and cars and crap piled to the ceiling and boats and motorcycles and just garbage... they eventually become "owned" by their possessions...
to each his own
Dude, you know I love you...AZGrizFan wrote:D1B wrote:
Hey fuckhead, I'm sick of paying for your fucking brats to go to school and their goddamned busride to and from. So fuck off welfare whore. You take WAY more than you put in, dumb fuck.
Peace out...
Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
So, because you choose to live simply that means that I have to give more of MY income? Not sure where you're going with this....
You big whinin' puss. You get more out of the system than you put in. Until that tips the other way, shut your ass, you teabaggin' Tea Party Tax-dodgin' ass featherplucker!
You fux have it so bad.
It's difficult to GET your point when you repeatedly HAVE NONE.D1B wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Z, misses the point again. What a dumb fucker.
Who knew? The man with the perfectly ironed shirts is a minimalist! Perhaps THAT'S why we can't seem to get any pics of his girlfriend in panties....he has no STUFF----i.e., a camera.Cleets Part 2 wrote:Oh yeah...SeattleGriz wrote:
Hey now. You know that crap is my mothers!!
I forgot about you: Yes take Seattlegriz for example
AZGrizFan wrote:It's difficult to GET your point when you repeatedly HAVE NONE.D1B wrote:
Z, misses the point again. What a dumb fucker.
Stop being so obtuse.
D1B wrote:The government pays you motherfuckers to have kids.
bobbythekidd wrote:D1B wrote:The government pays you motherfuckers to have kids.
One of the biggest scams people play with this tax code! Get rid of the child credit and now! We could save millions.
LMFAO at how out of touch you are. No one has kids to save money on taxes.AZGrizFan wrote:bobbythekidd wrote:
One of the biggest scams people play with this tax code! Get rid of the child credit and now! We could save millions.
Having kids to "play with the tax code"....that's the funniest thing I've heard in years. Yeah. I'm gonna have kids that cost a fortune, just so I can save a couple thousand on my taxes. WAFJ.
And, FYI, the "child credit" is one of those tax deductions that gets phased out pretty quickly.
They buy SSN # to get free money from the government! Now that hurts to the bone AZGF...AZGrizFan wrote:
Who knew? The man with the perfectly ironed shirts is a minimalist! Perhaps THAT'S why we can't seem to get any pics of his girlfriend in panties....he has no STUFF----i.e., a camera.
Or they actually HAVE kids to rip off the welfare system.bobbythekidd wrote:LMFAO at how out of touch you are. No one has kids to save money on taxes.AZGrizFan wrote:
Having kids to "play with the tax code"....that's the funniest thing I've heard in years. Yeah. I'm gonna have kids that cost a fortune, just so I can save a couple thousand on my taxes. WAFJ.
And, FYI, the "child credit" is one of those tax deductions that gets phased out pretty quickly.
Those little bastards cost the government and taxpayers a fortune too. Face it Curly, you take more out than you put in.AZGrizFan wrote:bobbythekidd wrote:
One of the biggest scams people play with this tax code! Get rid of the child credit and now! We could save millions.
Having kids to "play with the tax code"....that's the funniest thing I've heard in years. Yeah. I'm gonna have kids that cost a fortune, just so I can save a couple thousand on my taxes. WAFJ.
And, FYI, the "child credit" is one of those tax deductions that gets phased out pretty quickly.
bobbythekidd wrote:D1B wrote:The government pays you motherfuckers to have kids.
One of the biggest scams people play with this tax code! Get rid of the child credit and now! We could save millions.
That was me for the longest...so liberating.Cleets Part 2 wrote:Now that hurts to the bone AZGF...AZGrizFan wrote:
Who knew? The man with the perfectly ironed shirts is a minimalist! Perhaps THAT'S why we can't seem to get any pics of his girlfriend in panties....he has no STUFF----i.e., a camera.
However: Not so much a minimalist as a Free Spirit - owning sh!t ties you down man - in many ways I am a Hippie in spirit and a technician / engineer in my mind...
The two are not reflective of each other
but for example, I have one credit card and do not (will not) own a house...
I have: one bicycle - one truck - 2 guitars - one TV that's never on - One sofa one chair one bed...
that's it.. (oh and 2,465 shirts) but besides that I got nuthin' man...
Been saying dis here for years. Stupid motherfuckers here think I'm crazy. Bunch of gutless punks here, especially the donks and liberals who don't have my back.Turfdoc wrote:Since the conversation has gone this way I figured I would share with this group an idea that I have been tossing around with some colleagues (I work at a Canadian University so it is a pretty liberal crowd, although the government does support the Catholic Church in Ontario).
The largest problem facing the world today (and standing in the way of a high quality of life for all the world's citizens) is over population. Over population at our standard of living creates huge issues with the environment, fossil fuels, fisheries, coast lines, greenhouse gasses.... Now in the face of this our governments are encouraging us to have children by subsidizing the cost of raising those children via tax breaks and other head start and school programs. Our actions and policies do not match up with solving the largest environmental problem, over population.
So that being said, the government should halt giving any child tax credits and instead give tax breaks (very small but a good gesture) to people of reproductive years who chose not to have children. This will align policy with an attempt to solve our biggest environmental crisis.
By the way that is the argument I give when people hound me about not having children (believe me they do). I say I am more "green" than them because of my conscious decision not to procreate. I then follow it up by saying that they are selfish.
