Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

I notice MJ cannot answer a simple question, how is Trump running roughshod. He makes drive by statements that cannot be defended.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Skjellyfetti wrote:

That’s great news.

I still say that Thomas or even Roberts is gonna drop before her. Hopefully they will wait until Trump is gone. It will be a shocker to conservatives that were counting on a forever conk Supreme Court. If that doesn’t pan out then the Dems can always declare a national emergency and reconfigure the court to 12 members.

mainejeff wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:

That’s great news.

I still say that Thomas or even Roberts is gonna drop before her. Hopefully they will wait until Trump is gone. It will be a shocker to conservatives that were counting on a forever conk Supreme Court. If that doesn’t pan out then the Dems can always declare a national emergency and reconfigure the court to 12 members.

Thomas is one who I'd be worried about healthwise - he's already 70, he's been stocky, and he's African American and that already comes with a lower life expectancy. But Roberts? He's only 63 years old (22 years the junior to Ginsburg) and in pretty good health. He's even younger than Sotomayor. If there was anyone else who might go before Ginsburg I would look at Breyer - he's the only other one besides Ginsburg who was born before WWII (he's 80 years old now). I think both him and Ginsburg are likely to be waiting for a Democratic President, or at least a Democratic Senate, before they retire.

With that said, imagine the fireworks that will happen the next time a President of one party has to nominate a new justice when the Senate is held by the other party. The GOP Senate held off a few months last time for the next election, but the next time around you may see absolute gridlock and potentially a Constitutional crisis.

mainejeff wrote:Roberts is gonna drop before her.

Not unless some lefty whacko does something to him.

Has she died yet?

AZGrizFan wrote:Has she died yet?

No yet...but could be close...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/ ... re-1096102

The reason I mentioned Roberts is this.....

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/695 ... izure.html

Might be nothing but he has a history of seizures.

RBG may not have much time left...I pray for her soul...

‪ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... her-life/‬

mainejeff wrote:The reason I mentioned Roberts is this.....

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/695 ... izure.html

Might be nothing but he has a history of seizures.

Did that article really come from 2007?

Col Hogan wrote:RBG may not have much time left...I pray for her soul...

‪ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... her-life/‬

https://www.inquisitr.com/5254187/ruth- ... te-claims/

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Not Fighting ‘For Her Life’ With Pneumonia, Despite Outlet’s Claim

Death is the great equalizer, rich and poor all have to go down that road, hopefully she is prepared.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

89Hen wrote:

mainejeff wrote:The reason I mentioned Roberts is this.....

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/695 ... izure.html

Might be nothing but he has a history of seizures.

Did that article really come from 2007?

You expect mainjeff to come with something credible?

FoxNews getting a little ahead of themselves with anticipation:

93henfan wrote:FoxNews getting a little ahead of themselves with anticipation:

Fucking Fox News. I'm sure MAGAtards everywhere cremed their jeans.

Can you imagine if CNN or MSNBC had a picture of Trump with a graphic that he had died? I mean I will admit the thought makes me giddy but come on.......

She's baaaaccckkkk............

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/justice ... itter_abcn



Clarence Thomas is on the clock.....tick tock tick tock.

Imagine the lefty heads exploding all over America when Trump gets reelected and two more SCJ's bite the dust and he gets to replace them both.

AZGrizFan wrote:Imagine the lefty heads exploding all over America when Trump gets reelected and two more SCJ's bite the dust and he gets to replace them both.

Its gonna be awesome and 100% MAGA

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

mainejeff2 wrote:Suck it bitches!.....especially you, dead Jim Bunning (R) - Kentucky

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/24/politics ... urce=twCNN

Body: Alive
Brain: Dead

I might not agree with her but I like RBG. She's a feisty old broad.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

UNI88 wrote:I might not agree with her but I like RBG. She's a feisty old broad.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I’ve always liked her even though I disagree with her on many things.

I also like the version of the ACLU that she championed. They would go to court to protect civil liberties for even the most heinous people. Lately the ACLU has become a bit more illiberal. I have to think she has a problem with that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mainejeff2 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Imagine the lefty heads exploding all over America when Trump gets reelected and two more SCJ's bite the dust and he gets to replace them both.

My predictions are Roberts and the black dude.

RBG might outlive them all.

mainejeff2 wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Its gonna be awesome and 100% MAGA

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Trump isn't going to protect your Deplorable asses forever. Enjoy the froth while it lasts.....

We are Americans we will do whatever the fuck we want against you socialist nazi pricks.

We dictate this....not you

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

You really don't want liberal judges that high in the food chain...

at the bottom Liberal judges are super helpful
at the top - not so much

Chizzang wrote:You really don't want liberal judges that high in the food chain...

at the bottom Liberal judges are super helpful
at the top - not so much

There's a lot of truth in what you say.

In the lower courts, it's fine to have judges who are willing to work with the edges of precedent to find equitable solutions to the problem in front of them.

But if you have a Supreme Court that just makes it up as it goes along, the lower court judges will see that example and take the "law" to completely uncharted places, if need be, to create the result that they personally favor.

This is what was happening the in the 1960s through the 1980s. It is why Justice Scalia and the other originalists/textualists rebelled.