Flacco also finds a way to lose every year. Last I checked he hasn't won the Super Bowl.BlueHen86 wrote:And finds a way to lose every year. Good QB, but way overrated, probably because he plays in Dallas.Vidav wrote:
Everyone hates on Romo because he is the QB for the Cowboys but he puts up great numbers every year.
What's his playoff record versus Romo's? I think you're the hater here. Never took you to be one either.Vidav wrote:Flacco also finds a way to lose every year. Last I checked he hasn't won the Super Bowl.BlueHen86 wrote:
And finds a way to lose every year. Good QB, but way overrated, probably because he plays in Dallas.
I'm not a hater of Flacco. I just don't believe he is top 5. You only picked one of the QBs I listed to say didn't belong. So that still wouldn't put Flacco in the top 5.93henfan wrote:What's his playoff record versus Romo's? I think you're the hater here. Never took you to be one either.Vidav wrote:
Flacco also finds a way to lose every year. Last I checked he hasn't won the Super Bowl.
I think Flacco is top 5 right now, based on the two good eyes I have. If you want to build a case based on the accomplishments of the past few years that five guys you listed are better, than so be it. Flacco has no rings, so if that's all your basing it on, the yeah, Joe is not top 5.Vidav wrote:I'm not a hater of Flacco. I just don't believe he is top 5. You only picked one of the QBs I listed to say didn't belong. So that still wouldn't put Flacco in the top 5.93henfan wrote:
What's his playoff record versus Romo's? I think you're the hater here. Never took you to be one either.
I would never try and argue that Flacco hasn't been better in the playoffs than Romo. He clearly has been.
Grizza ftw.CAA Flagship wrote:Epic Hijack
Not last year. Led his team on what should have been a game winning drive, put the ball right in his receivers hands. The team lost, but it's not like Flacco found a way to blow it.Vidav wrote:Flacco also finds a way to lose every year. Last I checked he hasn't won the Super Bowl.BlueHen86 wrote:
And finds a way to lose every year. Good QB, but way overrated, probably because he plays in Dallas.
Never heard of him. Flacco is better.CAA Flagship wrote:Epic Hijack
John Clayton sucks black, midget dicks.Skjellyfetti wrote:John Clayton had him 13th. I think that's the best, unbiased, ranking.
Yeah, I don't think Clayton could handle full grown black man cock. But, still... I don't think many neutral observers would put Flacco in the top 5. Most Ravens fans wouldn't put him in the top 5.93henfan wrote:John Clayton sucks black, midget dicks.Skjellyfetti wrote:John Clayton had him 13th. I think that's the best, unbiased, ranking.
How's Armanti's pro career coming along? Haven't heard much since his successful college career.Skjellyfetti wrote:Yeah, I don't think Clayton could handle full grown black man cock. But, still... I don't think many neutral observers would put Flacco in the top 5. Most Ravens fans wouldn't put him in the top 5.93henfan wrote:
John Clayton sucks black, midget dicks.
Just delusional Fightin Blue Hen fans.
Am I on here claiming he's a top 5 wide receiver?93henfan wrote:How's Armanti's pro career coming along? Haven't heard much since his successful college career.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Yeah, I don't think Clayton could handle full grown black man cock. But, still... I don't think many neutral observers would put Flacco in the top 5. Most Ravens fans wouldn't put him in the top 5.
Just delusional Fightin Blue Hen fans.
That's not what I asked. How's his pro career going? Surely he's no Flacco, but he at least plays regularly, right? Starter material?Skjellyfetti wrote:Am I on here claiming he's a top 5 wide receiver?93henfan wrote:
How's Armanti's pro career coming along? Haven't heard much since his successful college career.
No. But, we have plenty of NFL'ers who are.93henfan wrote:That's not what I asked. How's his pro career going? Surely he's no Flacco, but he at least plays regularly, right? Starter material?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Am I on here claiming he's a top 5 wide receiver?
Again, you're all over the place.Skjellyfetti wrote:No. But, we have plenty of NFL'ers who are.93henfan wrote:
That's not what I asked. How's his pro career going? Surely he's no Flacco, but he at least plays regularly, right? Starter material?
I mean, how's Omar Cuff's NFL career?
You're the one bringing up Armanti to somehow defend your assertion that Flacco is a top 5 QB.93henfan wrote: Again, you're all over the place.
Actually, you're the troll who sniffs out every single opportunity you can to try to denigrate anything related to Delaware, including being a completely classless piece of shit in the 2010 championship game thread, which I still remember.Skjellyfetti wrote:You're the one bringing up Armanti to somehow defend your assertion that Flacco is a top 5 QB.93henfan wrote: Again, you're all over the place.
93henfan wrote: Actually, you're the troll who sniffs out every single opportunity you can to try to denigrate anything related to Delaware, including being a completely classless piece of shit in the 2010 championship game thread, which I still remember.
Nope. You've pretty much solidified your status with me, and likely most of the posters here, with the other several thousand of your musings here. Backtracking on two of them doesn't really do much.Skjellyfetti wrote:93henfan wrote: Actually, you're the troll who sniffs out every single opportunity you can to try to denigrate anything related to Delaware, including being a completely classless piece of shit in the 2010 championship game thread, which I still remember.
Calm down. I apologize for calling bullshit on Flacco being a top 5 QB. Please forgive me.
And find it in your heart to forgive me for whatever I posted 2 years ago that has you so bothered.
LOL WTF? Not only do you have Rapelisberger at 4, but Flacco at 5? Can I have what you're smoking?I think Flacco is top 5 right now, based on the two good eyes I have. If you want to build a case based on the accomplishments of the past few years that five guys you listed are better, than so be it. Flacco has no rings, so if that's all your basing it on, the yeah, Joe is not top 5.
If I had to pick a QB for my team right now, just for this season, I probably go Rodgers, Brady, Old Manning, Roethlisberger, then Flacco.
What a classless post. Why do you go out of your way to denigrate Delaware at every opportunity?Seahawks08 wrote: LOL WTF? Not only do you have Rapelisberger at 4, but Flacco at 5? Can I have what you're smoking?
First thing, Drew Brees shits on both and should actually be #2 ahead of Brady and (Old) Manning. Then you have Eli who is also better than both and would be the 5th. If we are going on ability, then Matt Ryan, Vick, Newton, and Romo are all better than Rapelisberger and Flacco. But if we are going by playoff experience and crap like that, then I could say Flacco is in the same group as Mark Sanchez. And last I checked, Sanchez was one of the worst QBs in the league. Your move.
Seahawks08 wrote:LOL WTF? Not only do you have Rapelisberger at 4, but Flacco at 5? Can I have what you're smoking?I think Flacco is top 5 right now, based on the two good eyes I have. If you want to build a case based on the accomplishments of the past few years that five guys you listed are better, than so be it. Flacco has no rings, so if that's all your basing it on, the yeah, Joe is not top 5.
If I had to pick a QB for my team right now, just for this season, I probably go Rodgers, Brady, Old Manning, Roethlisberger, then Flacco.
First thing, Drew Brees shits on both and should actually be #2 ahead of Brady and (Old) Manning. Then you have Eli who is also better than both and would be the 5th. If we are going on ability, then Matt Ryan, Vick, Newton, and Romo are all better than Rapelisberger and Flacco. But if we are going by playoff experience and crap like that, then I could say Flacco is in the same group as Mark Sanchez. And last I checked, Sanchez was one of the worst QBs in the league. Your move.
