Re: Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 11:11 am
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=47503
So his words are of a right wing wackadoodle, but his lifestyle in real life was of a left wing wackadoodle.kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 10:34 amSome more of his own words from a most trusted source….BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 9:10 pm
And Depape
-is an illegal immigrant from Canada
-was living in Berkley, CA
-was living on a property with a Black Lives Matter sign, and a rainbow & pot symbols flag.
-was a nudist protestor
-was a ‘hemp jewelry maker’
Who knew that the MAGA movement was so diverse..
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/paul-p ... -more-them
That argument doesn't really work for this war. If the tweet was advocating for US troops on the ground, then you'd have a point.
How much money should the US spend in Ukraine?Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:53 pmThat argument doesn't really work for this war. If the tweet was advocating for US troops on the ground, then you'd have a point.
It's about material and humanitarian support for Ukraine - who do want to fight again the occupiers.
Who do you want to win the war in Ukraine?
What a dishonest statement. How about we have a full accounting of where and who the money is going.
Are you MAGA?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:43 amWhat a dishonest statement. How about we have a full accounting of where and who the money is going.
Wilson, doesn't give two shits about Ukrainians, he just cares about keeping the DC money grift flowing, as he's got his hands in there. He's almost as bad as Bill Kristol and his ISW.
Nice false dilemma logical fallacy by the way.
If by MAGA you mean we should focus on Main Street vs Wall Street, then yes.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:20 amAre you MAGA?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:43 am
What a dishonest statement. How about we have a full accounting of where and who the money is going.
Wilson, doesn't give two shits about Ukrainians, he just cares about keeping the DC money grift flowing, as he's got his hands in there. He's almost as bad as Bill Kristol and his ISW.
Nice false dilemma logical fallacy by the way.
No. That’s not what I mean nor does that describe MAGA at all.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:28 amIf by MAGA you mean we should focus on Main Street vs Wall Street, then yes.
It's not that simple because Ukraine doesn't have control of their destiny. They are a corrupt US proxy. Let's see where our money has been going and who profited off that money. Nobody wants to see Ukraine decimated, but exposing the incredible DC grift would be great.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:03 amNo. That’s not what I mean nor does that describe MAGA at all.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:28 am
If by MAGA you mean we should focus on Main Street vs Wall Street, then yes.
Let’s try a different question…
Who do you want to win the war in Ukraine?
Until Putin stops the invasion?BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:34 pmHow much money should the US spend in Ukraine?Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:53 pm
That argument doesn't really work for this war. If the tweet was advocating for US troops on the ground, then you'd have a point.
It's about material and humanitarian support for Ukraine - who do want to fight again the occupiers.
Who do you want to win the war in Ukraine?
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:09 amIt's not that simple because Ukraine doesn't have control of their destiny. They are a corrupt US proxy. Let's see where our money has been going and who profited off that money. Nobody wants to see Ukraine decimated, but exposing the incredible DC grift would be great.
So your question cannot be answered in such a simplistic way. Had the Ukrainians been allowed to negotiate way back in March, this whole thing could have been over.
Which part? That DC grift has had their hands into Ukraine for years, or that Boris Johnson told Zelensky he couldn't negotiate with the Russians back in March?houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:41 amSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:09 am
It's not that simple because Ukraine doesn't have control of their destiny. They are a corrupt US proxy. Let's see where our money has been going and who profited off that money. Nobody wants to see Ukraine decimated, but exposing the incredible DC grift would be great.
So your question cannot be answered in such a simplistic way. Had the Ukrainians been allowed to negotiate way back in March, this whole thing could have been over.
You don't even believe that bullshit yourself
Its a simple question, even for Putin's catamite...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:03 amWhich part? That DC grift has had their hands into Ukraine for years, or that Boris Johnson told Zelensky he couldn't negotiate with the Ukrainians back in March?
If you're playing a poker game and you look around the table and and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you.houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:41 amSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:09 am
It's not that simple because Ukraine doesn't have control of their destiny. They are a corrupt US proxy. Let's see where our money has been going and who profited off that money. Nobody wants to see Ukraine decimated, but exposing the incredible DC grift would be great.
So your question cannot be answered in such a simplistic way. Had the Ukrainians been allowed to negotiate way back in March, this whole thing could have been over.
You don't even believe that bullshit yourself
Once again, trying to use a logical fallacy to get an answer is weak and uninformed. If this was solely about Ukraine minding its own business and Russia invading, it's obviously Ukraine.houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:21 amIts a simple question, even for Putin's catamite...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:03 am
Which part? That DC grift has had their hands into Ukraine for years, or that Boris Johnson told Zelensky he couldn't negotiate with the Ukrainians back in March?
Who do you want to win?
Two choices, the invader and the invaded.