Trump announces Brett Kavanaugh as his 2nd SCOTUS nominee.

[Col Hogan]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

[css75]

JSO, she didn’t have a date, time or place. Kavanaugh was able to account for where he was the whole damn summer. Doesn’t that count for anything, or are you blinded by TDS?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[∞∞∞]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

No surprise there; the GOP has always supported sexual predators.

Hell, their leader openly admits to being one.

[HI54UNI]

[HI54UNI]

And BTW I have not made a Party switch. I have been registered as a Libertarian for decades. It's just that I was a Libertarian who almost always voted Republican in an effort to pick the lessor of two evils among the two candidates that had a realistic chance to win. Now I am a Libertarian who will likely never vote Republican again as that Party has shown that it has lost its mind and is now the greater of two evils.

[Skjellyfetti]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

Did you bother to read that?

Donnelly, Manchin, Murkowski and Collins are all expected to vote the same way, per senators and aides

This doesn't mean they are voting for or against...I legitimately don't know. But these four aren't expected to end up in opposite places

[Vidav]

Do you have any proof it is lies??

[css75]

JSO, she didn’t have a date, time or place. Kavanaugh was able to account for where he was the whole damn summer. Doesn’t that count for anything, or are you blinded by TDS?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Trip, TDS has really got you. 2 of the accusers stories were so bad The NY Times refused to print. FDR had presented 0 evidence to support her claim, what is your problem. You seem to have list all logic.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

No surprise there; the GOP has always supported sexual predators.

Hell, their leader openly admits to being one.

But JSO says he's a liar so is his admission valid? Or is this one area where he has to admit that Trump is less of a liar than the Clinton's?

[Vidav]

No surprise there; the GOP has always supported sexual predators.

Hell, their leader openly admits to being one.

But JSO says he's a liar so is his admission valid? Or is this one area where he has to admit that Trump is less of a liar than the Clinton's?

What a stupid argument.

[UNI88]

But JSO says he's a liar so is his admission valid? Or is this one area where he has to admit that Trump is less of a liar than the Clinton's?

What a stupid argument.

This whole thing is foolish and the partisan hacks on both sides are clowns and you're calling my argument stupid?

[Skjellyfetti]

Do y'all consider the American Bar Association to be a libtard socialist organization?

[CID1990]

DR?

Well thats obvious!

I was talking about why an FBI investigation would not produce anything new, why it is a trap that could stall a vote right up to the midterms, and why the Judiciary Committee should probably request it anyway


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So yes- you were agreeing with me (even if you didn’t intend to.) An FBI investigation would only stall the inevitable and waste $$$.


And correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t the FBI say the wouldn’t investigate? Didn’t the PD which has jurisdiction where these alleged incidents occur say they’ll investigate if a report is made?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually, I was trying to draw a line to why there may be an FBI investigation

I don't know why youre being defensive

try loosening your tie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Baldy]

Do y'all consider the American Bar Association to be a libtard socialist organization?

Libtard socialists are one thing, but yes, the ABA skews heavily to the left.

[Baldy]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

No surprise there; the GOP has always supported sexual predators.

Hell, their leader openly admits to being one.

Now do Bill Clinton and Kevin Ellison.

[CID1990]

Boy, that filibuster of Gorsuch really looks stupid now, doesn't it?

Kavanaugh would already be finished...

But now, unless the sky somehow falls, he'll be confirmed with a few Dem votes

and then it will be time to get out the defibrillators and stick REAL CLOSE to Notorious RBG because she will be replaced by that woman from Notre Dame... who I'm pretty sure doesn't have any rape victims in the closet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

Do y'all consider the American Bar Association to be a libtard socialist organization?

The ABA has lost thousands of members due to its leftist political stances, starting with a controversial abortion plank in 1992.

[Bisonfanatical]

^^^^^^^ this

They did not do themselves any favors with these charges. The retribution could be a little stronger than when Cosby was fried ... imo

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Baldy]

That will only guarantee four more years of Trump.

[JoltinJoe]

Do y'all consider the American Bar Association to be a libtard socialist organization?

The ABA has lost thousands of members due to its leftist political stances, starting with a controversial abortion plank in 1992.

The ABA has become a means for its leadership to advance their political interests. It really does not set academic standards any more. There are far too many law schools today with ABA approval. We need fewer law schools and they must have higher standards. Any college graduate, no matter what his or her undergraduate record, can be admitted to some law school in the United States.

Further, ABA leadership seems to have no idea how to respond those changes in the legal profession that have resulted from the 2007-2008 economic meltdown, or to the coming changes that will result from the use of AI programs to resolve many legal issues. American law schools keep minting JDs at a rate that far exceeds demand.

Im my judgment, the ABA does very little to promote the standards of the practice of law in the United States or high academic standards. It has no vision of how to adapt legal education to the 21st Century market realities or how to address technological advances that will change the practice of law in the future . It continues to do business as usual, oblivious to change.

I don't need the ABA to tell me that Brett Kavanaugh is "highly qualified" for the Supreme Court. But the ABA did play an important role in vetting judicial nominees for the District Court, except it stopped doing that competently many years ago too.

Many years ago, I left the ABA because it was doing nothing that mattered to me or really improved the practice of law in the US.

[mainejeff]

"Revenge on behalf of the Clintons".....is this guy serious?

What is with the obsession with the Clintons by conservatives???

[Col Hogan]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

Did you bother to read that?

Donnelly, Manchin, Murkowski and Collins are all expected to vote the same way, per senators and aides

This doesn't mean they are voting for or against...I legitimately don't know. But these four aren't expected to end up in opposite places

Did you read it??? Manchin declared he’ll vote for Cavanaugh...the very lead sentence...

My colleague, Sarah Quinlan, just announced that West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has declared he will vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

And if they are all expected to vote the same way...what does that mean???

[mainejeff]

[93henfan]

she will be replaced by that woman from Notre Dame... who I'm pretty sure doesn't have any rape victims in the closet

Wanna make a bet?

I guarandamntee you the Dems are already making up their stories about her.

By bet on their angle with her will be racism. They're probably already lining up black women who attended high school and college with her.

[Ibanez]

Kavanaugh will be approved for SCOTUS...

Republicans Murkowski and Collins, and Democrats Donnelly and Manchin expected to vote for Kavanaugh

https://mobile.twitter.com/burgessev/st ... e-decision

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... e-decision

No surprise there; the GOP has always supported sexual predators.

Hell, their leader openly admits to being one.

And the Democrats have twice tried to elect a woman who denied the victims of sexual assault by a Democratic President. There’s crap on both sides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk