Ibanez wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:23 am
I listen to "Daily Drive" on Spotify each mornings. It's a blend of music and news. I typically skip the WaPo but today I listened.
Apparently, the wealthier countries are flexing their inequality by creating the COVID vaccine and then providing it to the poorer nations. Somehow, our ability to create a vaccine over some poorer country has created a "vaccine bias" and "vaccine inequality."
You can't make this crap up.
Vaccine privilege is real!
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:30 am
by 89Hen
UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:28 am
Vaccine privilege is real!
Ibanez wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:23 am
I listen to "Daily Drive" on Spotify each mornings. It's a blend of music and news. I typically skip the WaPo but today I listened.
Apparently, the wealthier countries are flexing their inequality by creating the COVID vaccine and then providing it to the poorer nations. Somehow, our ability to create a vaccine over some poorer country has created a "vaccine bias" and "vaccine inequality."
You can't make this crap up.
Vaccine privilege is real!
Vaccination rates in the US is highest for (non Hispanic) whites, is lagging for blacks and Hispanics. The vaccine must be racist...
UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:28 am
Vaccine privilege is real!
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:39 am
by CID1990
SeattleGriz wrote:
CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 5:14 pm
The quote function isnt working on my phone for some reason.
This reply is for SG
Viruses do not behave that way universally. Just because you have had a virus does not mean you have gained more immunity compared to if you had a vaccination. mRNA vaccines force the immune system to target a very narrowly focused part of the receptor proteins. Actually having the virus does not do this.
Coronaviruses are a prime example - this is why the is little to zero known conferred immunity to the common cold, which is also caused by a coronavirus.
Declaring that acquired immunity is somehow > than a vaccine has zero basis in scientific fact
You are using logic to describe biological process - that is a fatal flaw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glad someone on this board is pushing back!
In regards to your statement there is zero scientific basis, I have to disagree. If you perform any search on natural immunity vs vaccination and sort results before COVID, the hits are littered with statements from Immunologists and Public Health officials about how natural immunity is better than vaccination...but you run the risk of the disease beating the crap out of you to get natural immunity. I'm not worried about that with COVID.
As to the common cold, there are other families besides Coronavirus, like Rhinovirus, etc and we have around 200 different versions of the cold, so that in my opinion is the largest reason we can't have a universal cold vaccine, plus colds mostly don't tax the immune system causing a huge immune response.
Lastly, we have three studies...albeit preprint, which means they haven't been peer reviewed.
Their findings reveal that, unlike vaccination, natural SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a robust interferon response together with an induction of cytotoxic gene expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes
Interferon response and cytotoxic gene expression (perforin plus other factors) are huge.
There was a difference between the antibodies elicited by natural infection compared to that from the vaccine. Since the vaccine does not have the nucleocapsid protein, there are no antibodies against this in the vaccine-induced antibodies. However, antibodies against nucleocapsid were seen in natural infection, suggesting this could be a biomarker for natural infection.
Nothing spectacular here, but I'm of the belief working through a virus naturally and having the whole virus leads to many benefits we haven't discovered.
Specifically, of all infections during the study period, 99.3% occurred in participants who were not infected previously and remained unvaccinated. In contrast, only 0.7% of infections occurred in participants who were not previously infected but were currently vaccinated.
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
You catch that bolded part? Of the 55,000 people in the study, not a one was someone with natural immunity. All were from the vaccinated group. 55k x .07 = 3850
Not to mention the studies coming out showing SAR1 infected still have immunity 17 years later.
I have no beef with the vaccine, just think if you've had COVID, it's better than the vaccine. By the way, I am current on all my vaccines and so are my children.
I will see your long winded word salad which you do not understand, and raise you this (simply put):
Titers for SARS Cov-2 antibodies are higher for mRNA vaccinated persons than they are for COVID survivors. In literally every case.
That is a simple fact, easily found, and does not require a forest of poorly interpreted salad.
SeattleGriz wrote:
Glad someone on this board is pushing back!
In regards to your statement there is zero scientific basis, I have to disagree. If you perform any search on natural immunity vs vaccination and sort results before COVID, the hits are littered with statements from Immunologists and Public Health officials about how natural immunity is better than vaccination...but you run the risk of the disease beating the crap out of you to get natural immunity. I'm not worried about that with COVID.
As to the common cold, there are other families besides Coronavirus, like Rhinovirus, etc and we have around 200 different versions of the cold, so that in my opinion is the largest reason we can't have a universal cold vaccine, plus colds mostly don't tax the immune system causing a huge immune response.
Lastly, we have three studies...albeit preprint, which means they haven't been peer reviewed.
Nothing spectacular here, but I'm of the belief working through a virus naturally and having the whole virus leads to many benefits we haven't discovered.
You catch that bolded part? Of the 55,000 people in the study, not a one was someone with natural immunity. All were from the vaccinated group. 55k x .07 = 3850
Not to mention the studies coming out showing SAR1 infected still have immunity 17 years later.
I have no beef with the vaccine, just think if you've had COVID, it's better than the vaccine. By the way, I am current on all my vaccines and so are my children.
I will see your long winded word salad which you do not understand, and raise you this (simply put):
Titers for SARS Cov-2 antibodies are higher for mRNA vaccinated persons than they are for COVID survivors. In literally every case.
That is a simple fact, easily found, and does not require a forest of poorly interpreted salad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am familiar with that, as the vaccine was designed just for that purpose...to piss the immune system off so it mounts a strong response. You see the same thing with natural immunity when someone had a really bad case.
You've now cited ONE reason why you feel the vaccine provides better immunity, but offer no proof it actually is better. I've at least provided studies as to why I believe natural immunity is more comprehensive and better.
1) We do not know that there was a Chinese lab leak to cover up. People are WAY jumping to conclusions because of a report that some lab workers got sick. A lot of other nonsense going around too like that Quay guy saying the virus has a genetic characteristic that is unlikely for a coronavirus that evolved naturally when people who actually study coronaviruses say otherwise. Just all kinds of crap flying around right now.
2) There is absolutely nothing wrong with that letter. Zuckerberg proposed a "hub" to "make sure people can get authoritative information from reliable sources" and encourage people to practice social distancing while providing some ideas about doing it. THE HORROR.
If youu don‘t think the CPC knows exactly what happened then I‘ve got some oceanfront property in AZ to sell you. If the CPC had the proof it was Zoonotic they would have released it long ago. That leaves only a lab leak. They’ll try to keep that evidence from ever coming out because if how devastating it would be to China in the eyes of the world.
JSO is conveniently forgetting the "bat soup" narrative that was pushed as an explanation of the China Virus.
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 6:04 pm
If youu don‘t think the CPC knows exactly what happened then I‘ve got some oceanfront property in AZ to sell you. If the CPC had the proof it was Zoonotic they would have released it long ago. That leaves only a lab leak. They’ll try to keep that evidence from ever coming out because if how devastating it would be to China in the eyes of the world.
JSO is conveniently forgetting the "bat soup" narrative that was pushed as an explanation of the China Virus.
It’s still mostly just speculation driven by social media. It may end up being partially or completely true but so far it’s short on actual facts and long on political confirmation bias.
JSO is conveniently forgetting the "bat soup" narrative that was pushed as an explanation of the China Virus.
It’s still mostly just speculation driven by social media. It may end up being partially or completely true but so far it’s short on actual facts and long on political confirmation bias.
Naw if this came from a bat at a wet market or a soup or some other random place we would have heard about it by now. There's a reason the Chicoms didn't let anyone in to do any serious investigations of the origin, and it wasn't to cover up a wet market.
SDHornet wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 10:17 am
JSO is conveniently forgetting the "bat soup" narrative that was pushed as an explanation of the China Virus.
It’s still mostly just speculation driven by social media. It may end up being partially or completely true but so far it’s short on actual facts and long on political confirmation bias.
Are you talking about the lab leak theory or the zoonotic theory? Change "social media" to "CCP sycophants in the MSM and government" and your statement applies to zoonotic.
It’s still mostly just speculation driven by social media. It may end up being partially or completely true but so far it’s short on actual facts and long on political confirmation bias.
Are you talking about the lab leak theory or the zoonotic theory? Change "social media" to "CCP sycophants in the MSM and government" and your statement applies to zoonotic.
Both. Anything is possible including your comments regarding sycophants and the msm, but that’s kind of my point. Politicization creates a ton of useless noise.
It's good to have this discussion. Notice the attacks on sources provided. Already resorting to logical fallacies. Not a good sign.
Feel free to point out the fallacious logic.
I’m not sure what you don’t understand about viral antibodies:
they are those wee little magical things that *actually* stop viruses from multiplying inside the cells of your body
In the world of science and medicine that’s what is called “immunity”. It is really that simple.
More antibodies = more immunity
If you know of examples where some virus has not followed this very elementary biological maxim, I’ll be happy to entertain them. But specifics, please. I noticed in your last two replies you started to retreat into a bit of that klam-like vagueness so you can later claim you said nothing of the sort.
UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:09 am
Are you talking about the lab leak theory or the zoonotic theory? Change "social media" to "CCP sycophants in the MSM and government" and your statement applies to zoonotic.
Both. Anything is possible including your comments regarding sycophants and the msm, but that’s kind of my point. Politicization creates a ton of useless noise.
You're right. The problem is that the politicization happened by both sides. The anti-Trumpers and the CCP sycophants in the MSM and government beat down and dismissed the lab leak theory because Trump talked about it. That just fed the conspiracy theorists who don't trust the "deep state" and MSM anyway. People are criticizing them for being "short on actual facts and long on political confirmation bias" when they didn't do the same when the zoonotic theory was presented as truth just over a year ago. Political bias and agenda, not scientific research is driving perspective and policy.
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 3:09 pm
by Gil Dobie
Stole this one from Cleets.
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 3:23 pm
by CID1990
Gil Dobie wrote:Stole this one from Cleets.
That lady is an actual medical doctor
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:23 pm
by Gil Dobie
My Dr confirmed today that there is pretty good evidence Covid was here before January 2020. He thinks my wife had it in November/December of 2019, after a trip to California. I was pretty sick, for a shorter time too. That's my conspiracy and I'm sticking to it.
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:27 pm
by SDHornet
Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:23 pm
My Dr confirmed today that there is pretty good evidence Covid was here before January 2020. He thinks my wife had it in November/December of 2019, after a trip to California. I was pretty sick, for a shorter time too. That's my conspiracy and I'm sticking to it.
If your symptoms included an itchy crotch, I have some bad news about your wife's' trip to CA.
Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:23 pm
My Dr confirmed today that there is pretty good evidence Covid was here before January 2020. He thinks my wife had it in November/December of 2019, after a trip to California. I was pretty sick, for a shorter time too. That's my conspiracy and I'm sticking to it.
If your symptoms included an itchy crotch, I have some bad news about your wife's' trip to CA.
Nope, I not going to get into family bashing on here, not a good idea.
I know, didn't want to comeback, family related. Some other dick I would.
Fair enough.
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:48 pm
by AZGrizFan
Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:23 pm
My Dr confirmed today that there is pretty good evidence Covid was here before January 2020. He thinks my wife had it in November/December of 2019, after a trip to California. I was pretty sick, for a shorter time too. That's my conspiracy and I'm sticking to it.
That’s no conspiracy theory. I’m positive I caught it while on a cruise in December of 2019.
