She is such an idiot.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:18 pmRICO isn‘t a crime.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2023 7:41 pm
They were charged with:
As I understand it:
- Kenneth Chesebro - Violation of the Georgia RICO Act, Conspiracy to Commit Impersonating a Public Officer, Conspiracy to Commit Forgery in the First Degree, Conspiracy to Commit False Statements & Writings, Conspiracy to Commit Filing False Documents
- Jenna Ellis - Violation of the Georgia RICO Act, Solicitation of Violation of Oath By Public Officer
- Sidney Powell - Violation of the Georgia RICO Act, Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud, Conspiracy to Commit Computer Theft, Conspiracy to Commit Computer Trespass, Conspiracy to Commit Computer Invasion of Privacy, Conspiracy to Defraud the State
- Chesebro pled guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Filing False Documents, a felony.
- Ellis pled guilty to a charge of aiding and abetting false statements and writings, a felony.
- Powell pled guilty to six misdemeanor counts of intentional election interference.
Signed,
AOC
Team Trump v/s Everyone
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Child like reasoning. The discussion was between Lara and Kamala. Trump had nothing to do with the two of them. If you want to bring Trump up, bring it up as a separate topic. Don't use it as a red herring to distract from your nonexistent argument.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:02 pmYou, a trump supporter, called kamala an adulterer which made adultery fair game. Don't want trump brought into the discussion, don't call kamala an adulterer.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:52 am
The discussion was about Lara and Kamala, not Trump.
Lara didn't commit adultery either. I like how you know for sure Lara's motives.
See. Intellectually lazy.
Questioning how I know lara's motives while saying nothing about MAQA yahoos acting like they know kamala's motives is ironic (hint - that's code for hypocritical which seems to be one of the defining characteristics of MAQA yahoos).
You be you and keep trying to justify the double standard used by and for MAQA yahoos and anyone who doesn't agree with them.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Child like reasoning = I can't refute your argument so I'm going to attack you (and attempt to limit the scope of the debate). Isn't that one of those ad hominem attacks that you're always complaining about others using and here you are doing it yourself. Does your hypocrisy have any limits?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:55 pmChild like reasoning. The discussion was between Lara and Kamala. Trump had nothing to do with the two of them. If you want to bring Trump up, bring it up as a separate topic. Don't use it as a red herring to distract from your nonexistent argument.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:02 pm
You, a trump supporter, called kamala an adulterer which made adultery fair game. Don't want trump brought into the discussion, don't call kamala an adulterer.
Questioning how I know lara's motives while saying nothing about MAQA yahoos acting like they know kamala's motives is ironic (hint - that's code for hypocritical which seems to be one of the defining characteristics of MAQA yahoos).
You be you and keep trying to justify the double standard used by and for MAQA yahoos and anyone who doesn't agree with them.
You might want to limit the discussion to being between lara and kamala but I refuse to play your game. Don't like it, tough. This is the "team trump v/s Everyone" thread. trump is always in play especially when a trump supporter is calling someone an adulterer.
How about this for using your own words against you:
You can attempt to dismiss trump's utter disrespect for the sanctity of marriage, but I won't. But it is very telling to see how you twist marriage to be nothing when it concerns trump and then 180 and insinuate kamala is a adulterer when she dated a man who had been amicably separated from his wife for 12 years.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61969
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Does this mean he’s striking out with his billionaires or has secured the money and is projecting?
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Child. Here is your original statement I replied to.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:19 pmChild like reasoning = I can't refute your argument so I'm going to attack you (and attempt to limit the scope of the debate). Isn't that one of those ad hominem attacks that you're always complaining about others using and here you are doing it yourself. Does your hypocrisy have any limits?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:55 pm
Child like reasoning. The discussion was between Lara and Kamala. Trump had nothing to do with the two of them. If you want to bring Trump up, bring it up as a separate topic. Don't use it as a red herring to distract from your nonexistent argument.
You might want to limit the discussion to being between lara and kamala but I refuse to play your game. Don't like it, tough. This is the "team trump v/s Everyone" thread. trump is always in play especially when a trump supporter is calling someone an adulterer.
How about this for using your own words against you:
You can attempt to dismiss trump's utter disrespect for the sanctity of marriage, but I won't. But it is very telling to see how you twist marriage to be nothing when it concerns trump and then 180 and insinuate kamala is a adulterer when she dated a man who had been amicably separated from his wife for 12 years.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.I loved it when SG got upset over my criticism of lara trump
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61969
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Lara and Eric haven’t had sex?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:06 pmChild. Here is your original statement I replied to.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:19 pm
Child like reasoning = I can't refute your argument so I'm going to attack you (and attempt to limit the scope of the debate). Isn't that one of those ad hominem attacks that you're always complaining about others using and here you are doing it yourself. Does your hypocrisy have any limits?
You might want to limit the discussion to being between lara and kamala but I refuse to play your game. Don't like it, tough. This is the "team trump v/s Everyone" thread. trump is always in play especially when a trump supporter is calling someone an adulterer.
How about this for using your own words against you:
You can attempt to dismiss trump's utter disrespect for the sanctity of marriage, but I won't. But it is very telling to see how you twist marriage to be nothing when it concerns trump and then 180 and insinuate kamala is a adulterer when she dated a man who had been amicably separated from his wife for 12 years.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.I loved it when SG got upset over my criticism of lara trump
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
Damn!
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
SG trying to argue that kamala's supposed adultery is important but trump's known adultery isn't ...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:06 pmChild. Here is your original statement I replied to.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:19 pm
Child like reasoning = I can't refute your argument so I'm going to attack you (and attempt to limit the scope of the debate). Isn't that one of those ad hominem attacks that you're always complaining about others using and here you are doing it yourself. Does your hypocrisy have any limits?
You might want to limit the discussion to being between lara and kamala but I refuse to play your game. Don't like it, tough. This is the "team trump v/s Everyone" thread. trump is always in play especially when a trump supporter is calling someone an adulterer.
How about this for using your own words against you:
You can attempt to dismiss trump's utter disrespect for the sanctity of marriage, but I won't. But it is very telling to see how you twist marriage to be nothing when it concerns trump and then 180 and insinuate kamala is a adulterer when she dated a man who had been amicably separated from his wife for 12 years.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.I loved it when SG got upset over my criticism of lara trump
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
eric should ask for paternity tests and see if he can find out who Luke and Carolina's fathers are.kalm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:09 pmLara and Eric haven’t had sex?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:06 pm
Child. Here is your original statement I replied to.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
Damn!
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
-
- Level3
- Posts: 3610
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
- I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Paternity test?
The Biden crime family is keeping that industry in business
Not only do they have a billboard in Washington DC displaying the national debt, but also have one displaying the number of Joe’s illegitimate grandchildren ..
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 29971
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Last edited by BDKJMU on Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Proud Ultra MAGA deplorable fascist NAZI trash (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Clinton/Biden/Harris).
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
How would Murthy v. Missouri impact trump's influence on truth social?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Sure, if that was the topic you started, but it isn't. Topic was between two women and had nothing to do with Trump.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:26 pmSG trying to argue that kamala's supposed adultery is important but trump's known adultery isn't ...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:06 pm
Child. Here is your original statement I replied to.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
At least Houndy tries. You're just lazy.
Please explain to us all how Trump's infidelity is relevant to a discussion about Lara and Kamala?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
When trump cheats on his wives it's just infidelity but when kamala has a relationship with a man who has been separated from his wife for 12 years it's adultery?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 12:25 pmSure, if that was the topic you started, but it isn't. Topic was between two women and had nothing to do with Trump.
At least Houndy tries. You're just lazy.
Please explain to us all how Trump's infidelity is relevant to a discussion about Lara and Kamala?
trump's adultery became relevant when you accused kamala of adultery. You're free to disagree but this is a message board, if you think you get to decide what is and isn't within the scope of debate you're
Maybe you should go over to AGS and learn to swim in the kiddy pool with other MAQA yahoos.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Me saying Kamala committed adultery, which she did, means Trump is now relevant in a discussion about two women on a completely separate topic?UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 1:02 pmWhen trump cheats on his wives it's just infidelity but when kamala has a relationship with a man who has been separated from his wife for 12 years it's adultery?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 12:25 pm
Sure, if that was the topic you started, but it isn't. Topic was between two women and had nothing to do with Trump.
At least Houndy tries. You're just lazy.
Please explain to us all how Trump's infidelity is relevant to a discussion about Lara and Kamala?
trump's adultery became relevant when you accused kamala of adultery. You're free to disagree but this is a message board, if you think you get to decide what is and isn't within the scope of debate you're
Maybe you should go over to AGS and learn to swim in the kiddy pool with other MAQA yahoos.
"if you don't like it, tough!"
"you don't get to tell me what to do"
As I thought. There is no connection. Only you making one up in your head and trying desperately to save your logical fallacy of reasoning.
Oh man. As I've said all along. Run along UNI Jr.
Uni Jr and his obsession with Trump (death).
Last edited by SeattleGriz on Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:33 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:14 pmAs I thought. There is no connection. Only you making one up in your head and trying desperately to save your logical fallacy of reasoning.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 1:02 pm
When trump cheats on his wives it's just infidelity but when kamala has a relationship with a man who has been separated from his wife for 12 years it's adultery?
trump's adultery became relevant when you accused kamala of adultery. You're free to disagree but this is a message board, if you think you get to decide what is and isn't within the scope of debate you're
Maybe you should go over to AGS and learn to swim in the kiddy pool with other MAQA yahoos.
Me saying Kamala committed adultery means Trump is now relevant in a discussion about two women on a completely separate topic. "If I don't like it, tough!"
Oh man. As I've said all along. Run along UNI Jr.
Uni Jr and his obsession with Trump.
Last edited by UNI88 on Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Run along son. You've been exposed for your juvenile reasoning.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:31 pmAre you really this dense?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:14 pm
As I thought. There is no connection. Only you making one up in your head and trying desperately to save your logical fallacy of reasoning.
Me saying Kamala committed adultery means Trump is now relevant in a discussion about two women on a completely separate topic. "If I don't like it, tough!"
Oh man. As I've said all along. Run along UNI Jr.
Uni Jr and his obsession with Trump.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Oh, I'm sure they have. And you can bet Lara was thinking the whole time her and Eric were dating, "If I could just bag this guy in marriage, that RNC co-chair is all mine in nine years!"kalm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:09 pmLara and Eric haven’t had sex?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:06 pm
Child. Here is your original statement I replied to.
I told you I wasn't upset, I was pointing out your reasoning was a false equivalency.
You've floundered, back tracked and obfuscated in an attempt to distract from actually addressing the original point. Look at how much shit you have thrown on the wall.
You run back to "But Trump!" at the drop of a hat, even when it has no relation to the topic at hand. You could not defend your stance honestly.
Regardless of what you incorrectly think, the two instances are not equal. Kamala got her position by sleeping with a married man. Lara got hers because she's part of the Trump family. Both were gifts, but the reasons are vastly different.
Damn!
Now that's how you play the long game. She was Trumpian 4D chess before 4D chess was cool. All she had to do was fuck the guy, marry him and have his children and the job would become hers!
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
And you've been exposed for your biased reasoning and hypocritical double standard.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:34 pmRun along son. You've been exposed for your juvenile reasoning.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:30 pmAnd you've been exposed for your biased reasoning and hypocritical double standard.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:34 pm
Run along son. You've been exposed for your juvenile reasoning.
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
How did "donald trump had anything to do with either lara or kamala being appointed to their positions"? He has something to do with the discussion because:SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:50 pm
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
- This is the "Team trump v/s Everyone" thread so he's fair game in any post on this thread (I can't help it if you're a snowflake who needs a safe space every time trump is mocked),
- He's lara trump's father-in-law and the reason she got the nepotism appointment to the RNC,
- You alleged that kamala committed adultery to get appointed to her position. That brought adultery into the discussion, trump is a known adulterer and you support trump. It's fair game to point out the hypocrisy of your criticism of kamala's alleged adultery while trying to sweep trump's serial adultery under the rug (infidelity? really?).
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61969
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
^ a grand example of why this all won’t end well for MAGA or the GOP.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:50 pm
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24406
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Somebody had it in for him. Probably Honest DonSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:06 pmOh, I'm sure they have. And you can bet Lara was thinking the whole time her and Eric were dating, "If I could just bag this guy in marriage, that RNC co-chair is all mine in nine years!"
Now that's how you play the long game. She was Trumpian 4D chess before 4D chess was cool. All she had to do was fuck the guy, marry him and have his children and the job would become hers!
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Another one of SG's victims after being depantsed ...kalm wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:36 pm^ a grand example of why this all won’t end well for MAGA or the GOP.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:50 pm
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Please. Keep digging that hole.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:12 pmHow did "donald trump had anything to do with either lara or kamala being appointed to their positions"? He has something to do with the discussion because:SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:50 pm
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
- This is the "Team trump v/s Everyone" thread so he's fair game in any post on this thread (I can't help it if you're a snowflake who needs a safe space every time trump is mocked),
- He's lara trump's father-in-law and the reason she got the nepotism appointment to the RNC,
- You alleged that kamala committed adultery to get appointed to her position. That brought adultery into the discussion, trump is a known adulterer and you support trump. It's fair game to point out the hypocrisy of your criticism of kamala's alleged adultery while trying to sweep trump's serial adultery under the rug (infidelity? really?).
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17209
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
What does that even mean?kalm wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:36 pm^ a grand example of why this all won’t end well for MAGA or the GOP.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:50 pm
"you've been exposed"
It's all in this thread bro. Me asking you a simple question about how Donald Trump had anything to do with either Lara or Kamala being appointed to their positions and all you have is, "you don't get to tell me what to think".
The real irony is you love to use the MAQA yahoo phrase, but you've just proven you are at the opposite end of the spectrum and can't reason properly.
Thank you. This total depantsing was a blast. Run along, get your binky an take a nap.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz