See? If THAT’S not evidence enough I don’t know what is.houndawg wrote:Who could doubt the word of an officer and gentleman that recognized the political genius of Sarah Palin long before the rest of us?AZGrizFan wrote:
I’d show you my ballot, but with dipshits like you even that wouldn’t be enough.
Guess you’ll just have to take the word of an officer and a gentleman.
That might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...AZGrizFan wrote:So ANTIFA is a product of the Russians?Chizzang wrote:
Russian election meddling worked - enough that AZ thought ANTIFA was rioting all over America...
and you though they were as numerous at the Deplorable's
The continual social media bombardment from Russian funded sources of radical black activists
Creating the appearance of a Nation in chaotic turmoil was successful
it mobilized states like Pennsylvania and Ohio without question..!!!
and it's still largely misunderstood by Conservatives
as shown here
My niece (a proud member) will be crushed.
I was aroused by BLM's genesis in the wake of Ferguson - the complete fiction driven anger of itChizzang wrote:That might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...AZGrizFan wrote: So ANTIFA is a product of the Russians?
My niece (a proud member) will be crushed.
And you posted some doozies
ANTIFA is real and nobody disputes that and so is BLM
But neither organization spent a dollar advertising on social media in Ohio and Pennsylvania
Yet somehow those states were absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric
If you can't see that having an awakening (even terrifying) effect on regular folks you're willfully stupid
and it already worked on you as it had you believing a falsehood
and even good ol balanced keel CID was aroused by the misinformation campaign
It worked... That much is patently obvious
To what extent exactly is yet undetermined
Can't really speak for Ohio, but having lived in Pennsylvania for the past 30 some odd years I can't really agree that Pennsylvania was "absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric" in the lead up to the 2016 election. It just wasn't. Heck, most of the ANTIFA stuff didn't really come to public attention until the Charlottesville rioting and that came well after the election. Democrats ignored most of PA in the 2016 election, that had a far greater impact than any "plastering" of "rhetoric" did.Chizzang wrote: But neither organization spent a dollar advertising on social media in Ohio and Pennsylvania
Yet somehow those states were absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric
:
So you understand how facebook and social media advertising works right..?GannonFan wrote:Can't really speak for Ohio, but having lived in Pennsylvania for the past 30 some odd years I can't really agree that Pennsylvania was "absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric" in the lead up to the 2016 election. It just wasn't. Heck, most of the ANTIFA stuff didn't really come to public attention until the Charlottesville rioting and that came well after the election. Democrats ignored most of PA in the 2016 election, that had a far greater impact than any "plastering" of "rhetoric" did.Chizzang wrote: But neither organization spent a dollar advertising on social media in Ohio and Pennsylvania
Yet somehow those states were absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric
:
Yes, I do, thank you very much. And my circle of friends are wide and varied in terms of the political spectrum, from the Women's Studies prof to the brother-in-law who's an ex-Marine and living in god's country. Nobody was talking about ANTIFA and BLM wasn't a major issue. Hillary lost PA because she didn't come here and because she was more unlikeable than Trump in the minds of the voters and she didn't appeal to the Obama voters who came out in the previous elections. If she campaigns differently it wouldn't even be a discussion.Chizzang wrote:So you understand how facebook and social media advertising works right..?GannonFan wrote:
Can't really speak for Ohio, but having lived in Pennsylvania for the past 30 some odd years I can't really agree that Pennsylvania was "absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric" in the lead up to the 2016 election. It just wasn't. Heck, most of the ANTIFA stuff didn't really come to public attention until the Charlottesville rioting and that came well after the election. Democrats ignored most of PA in the 2016 election, that had a far greater impact than any "plastering" of "rhetoric" did.
Do you have a gun license
Are you a registered Republican
Does your router location and zip code match the demographic..?
You see what it wants you to see
Well there you have it...GannonFan wrote:Yes, I do, thank you very much. And my circle of friends are wide and varied in terms of the political spectrum, from the Women's Studies prof to the brother-in-law who's an ex-Marine and living in god's country. Nobody was talking about ANTIFA and BLM wasn't a major issue. Hillary lost PA because she didn't come here and because she was more unlikeable than Trump in the minds of the voters and she didn't appeal to the Obama voters who came out in the previous elections. If she campaigns differently it wouldn't even be a discussion.Chizzang wrote:
So you understand how facebook and social media advertising works right..?
Do you have a gun license
Are you a registered Republican
Does your router location and zip code match the demographic..?
You see what it wants you to see
Just taking a page from your book - you just know that all of those folks were 1) plastered with ads 2) were dumb enough not to recognize they were fake and 3) were so incensed by the ads (because they were simpletons) that they voted for Trump. Because how could they vote for him otherwise? I'm sure all the folks of Western Pennsylvania are grateful for your condescending care and consideration for their well being and that you are gifting them with your superior awesomeness. You're a saint (well, a non-religious equivalent).Chizzang wrote:Well there you have it...GannonFan wrote:
Yes, I do, thank you very much. And my circle of friends are wide and varied in terms of the political spectrum, from the Women's Studies prof to the brother-in-law who's an ex-Marine and living in god's country. Nobody was talking about ANTIFA and BLM wasn't a major issue. Hillary lost PA because she didn't come here and because she was more unlikeable than Trump in the minds of the voters and she didn't appeal to the Obama voters who came out in the previous elections. If she campaigns differently it wouldn't even be a discussion.
Thank you for solving that problem and clearing up all the confusion
all the folks of Western Pennsylvania thank you for your assistance
Your "I know, because my friends" isn't at all anecdotal
and absolutely without question speaks for all the residence of Western PA
Feel free to tackle Ohio when you have a minute...
It's very difficult to tell what's real and what isn'tGannonFan wrote:Just taking a page from your book - you just know that all of those folks were 1) plastered with ads 2) were dumb enough not to recognize they were fake and 3) were so incensed by the ads (because they were simpletons) that they voted for Trump. Because how could they vote for him otherwise? I'm sure all the folks of Western Pennsylvania are grateful for your condescending care and consideration for their well being and that you are gifting them with your superior awesomeness. You're a saint (well, a non-religious equivalent).Chizzang wrote:
Well there you have it...
Thank you for solving that problem and clearing up all the confusion
all the folks of Western Pennsylvania thank you for your assistance
Your "I know, because my friends" isn't at all anecdotal
and absolutely without question speaks for all the residence of Western PA
Feel free to tackle Ohio when you have a minute...
and you know this how? because mainstream media told you so?Chizzang wrote:That might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...AZGrizFan wrote: So ANTIFA is a product of the Russians?
My niece (a proud member) will be crushed.
And you posted some doozies
ANTIFA is real and nobody disputes that and so is BLM
But neither organization spent a dollar advertising on social media in Ohio and Pennsylvania
Yet somehow those states were absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric
Says the guy who just spoke for all the people of two states.Chizzang wrote:Well there you have it...GannonFan wrote:
Yes, I do, thank you very much. And my circle of friends are wide and varied in terms of the political spectrum, from the Women's Studies prof to the brother-in-law who's an ex-Marine and living in god's country. Nobody was talking about ANTIFA and BLM wasn't a major issue. Hillary lost PA because she didn't come here and because she was more unlikeable than Trump in the minds of the voters and she didn't appeal to the Obama voters who came out in the previous elections. If she campaigns differently it wouldn't even be a discussion.
Thank you for solving that problem and clearing up all the confusion
all the folks of Western Pennsylvania thank you for your assistance
Your "I know, because my friends" isn't at all anecdotal
and absolutely without question speaks for all the residence of Western PA
Feel free to tackle Ohio when you have a minute...
Holy Cow...AZGrizFan wrote:and you know this how? because mainstream media told you so?Chizzang wrote:
That might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...
And you posted some doozies
ANTIFA is real and nobody disputes that and so is BLM
But neither organization spent a dollar advertising on social media in Ohio and Pennsylvania
Yet somehow those states were absolutely plastered with BLM and ANTIFA rhetoric
I'm speaking on behalf of the Department of Justice of the United States of AmericaAZGrizFan wrote:Says the guy who just spoke for all the people of two states.Chizzang wrote:
Well there you have it...
Thank you for solving that problem and clearing up all the confusion
all the folks of Western Pennsylvania thank you for your assistance
Your "I know, because my friends" isn't at all anecdotal
and absolutely without question speaks for all the residence of Western PA
Feel free to tackle Ohio when you have a minute...
*residents
Isn't that what is happening now with Mueller? Trumps own DoJ started it.JohnStOnge wrote:Look, let's just hope that the Democrats win a majority in at least one House of Congress so that we can have a real investigation into the obvious corruption associated with the Trump Administration. Yes, it'll be biased the other way. But that's better than the situation is right now. I'm a lot more concerned about having this corruption and having the Republicans run interference for it than I am about the Democrats trying to go too far. I think that there is a lot more danger in having a political party cover up as is going on now than to have a political party try to show misconduct when there is none.
I prefer the America in my head, but thanks.Chizzang wrote:I'm speaking on behalf of the Department of Justice of the United States of AmericaAZGrizFan wrote:
Says the guy who just spoke for all the people of two states.
*residents
and the well documented Russian indictments for meddling in the Election
Holy sh!tballs dude... Welcome to America I think you'll like it here
This.∞∞∞ wrote:Do none of you run ad blocking? I don't think I've seen an internet ad for years.
Pop-ups are blocked. But the ones embedded in the pages still come through. I was talking to my wife about that. I barely see them, and never click on them. Especially the ones on the phone apps. Same goes with ones in magazines and newspapers. I just ignore them to get to what I want to see. I don't understand how companies spend so much money on them. IMO, TV advertising is the most effective and it is dying.∞∞∞ wrote:Do none of you run ad blocking? I don't think I've seen an internet ad for years.
No because it's reasonable to believe that if Mueller finds stuff on Trump and the Republicans are still in charge of both houses of Congress they will just spike it. It's pretty obvious that the Republican Congress is running interference for Trump right now. We need the Democrats in control of at least one House.Ibanez wrote:Isn't that what is happening now with Mueller? Trumps own DoJ started it.JohnStOnge wrote:Look, let's just hope that the Democrats win a majority in at least one House of Congress so that we can have a real investigation into the obvious corruption associated with the Trump Administration. Yes, it'll be biased the other way. But that's better than the situation is right now. I'm a lot more concerned about having this corruption and having the Republicans run interference for it than I am about the Democrats trying to go too far. I think that there is a lot more danger in having a political party cover up as is going on now than to have a political party try to show misconduct when there is none.
Interesting. The same 48% who voted for the bitch.JohnStOnge wrote:Now this is interesting:
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/p ... 697671002/
There's discussion of a poll of Ohio and here is the question/answer distribution that is notable:
48.8% of respondents said they want their vote to change the direction President Trump is leading the nation vs. 27.6% who said they support the direction President Trump is leading the nation.
That’s right, Mr. Faux Conservative Huey P. StLonge.JohnStOnge wrote:No because it's reasonable to believe that if Mueller finds stuff on Trump and the Republicans are still in charge of both houses of Congress they will just spike it. It's pretty obvious that the Republican Congress is running interference for Trump right now. We need the Democrats in control of at least one House.Ibanez wrote: Isn't that what is happening now with Mueller? Trumps own DoJ started it.
So can you explain how a mentally ill person (your words) like Trump has been able to hide/cover up his Russian collusion from the DOJ, FBI, CIA this long? What is taking Mueller so long? Wouldn't such evidence be so readily available that Trump would have been impeached by now?JohnStOnge wrote:No because it's reasonable to believe that if Mueller finds stuff on Trump and the Republicans are still in charge of both houses of Congress they will just spike it. It's pretty obvious that the Republican Congress is running interference for Trump right now. We need the Democrats in control of at least one House.Ibanez wrote: Isn't that what is happening now with Mueller? Trumps own DoJ started it.