Big Sky Predictions 9-30

JALMOND · Post by **JALMOND** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 7:13 pm

Week number 2 in Big Sky action and everyone plays except Southern Utah, who drew the short straw and will sit out. I need a perfect week as I am currently 29-11 overall. Some great matchups in the conference this week and some tough games to choose. Here is my futile attempt at perfection this week.

CP at ISU---Who'd a thought the Bengals maybe should have won last week? Who'd a thought the Mustangs are the ones reeling coming in to this game? Who'd a thought best bet is the Bengals...ISU 38, CP 27.

UM at PSU---The wheels came off the Grizzlies train last week and now they have to go on the road and meet a rested Vikings team would had two weeks to prepare for this game...PSU 31, UM 30.

UND at UCD---The Aggies took one square in the jaw last week, but they get to come home and play the Hawks who are just trying to survive the injury bug. Hawks are better than this but...UCD 32, UND 24.

UNC at NAU---The Bears almost gave the game back last week but recovered nicely. The Lumberjacks are dealing with a rash of injuries, yet still got a road win last week...NAU 38, UNC 35.

SAC at EWU---How good are the Hornets? Their defense is great but they get a strong test from the Eagles who found their offense in the second half last week. Can the Hornets slow them down?...EWU 24, SAC 20.

WSU at MSU---The Wildcats looked like they are hitting on all cylinders last week while the Bobcats were equally as impressive in their game. Wildcats are tough at home, but this is on the road...MSU 28, WSU 24.

Taking all the home teams this weekend.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:19 pm

Good GOD if your UM/PSU prediction comes true I might have to just get off eGriz altogether.....

Post by **SDHornet** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:27 pm

CP
UM
dungpile
NAU
EWU
WSU

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:39 pm

CP (by 3 TDs)
UM (spread of 10 or less)
Sioux (blowout)
NAU (blowout)
Sac (Heart won out over brain)
BBQ (blowout)

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 9:05 pm

Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it

Montana 31-21 Hillsboro St. — PSU ain't gonna throw for 549 yards

NoDak 24-35 Davis — Davis needs to regroup, UND needs Dr. McCoy

Cal Poly 35-45 Idaho St. — Both suck at pass defense, but only one really passes

NoCo 34-42 NAU — Could be a shootout… I'll go with the Skydome

Weber 27-21 Montana St. — MSU's kicking issues could cost them here

Jjoey52 · Post by **Jjoey52** » Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:11 pm

EWU 38-17
UM 45-14
ND 27-24
ISU 37-17
UNC 41-38
MSU 30-21

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post by **Screamin_Eagle174** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:49 am

AZGrizFan wrote:Good GOD if your UM/PSU prediction comes true I might have to just get off eGriz altogether.....

I'd have to visit more frequently.

Wildcat Ryan · Post by **Wildcat Ryan** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:42 am

Weber State- 28
Montana State- 26

In a game filled with emotion, Weber escapes the sea of Blue and Gold with a win.

Cal Poly- 21
Idaho State- 40

These teams are going in the complete opposite direction

Sacramento State- 28
Eastern Washington- 35

Sacramento State has proven they can score and their defense is playing very well, but they aren't at home this time.

Montana- 38
Portland State- 30

The Griz have a weak secondary, lucky for them they are playing a team that cant pass.

Northern Colorado- 28
Northern Arizona- 30

Game really could go either way but I think NAU comes out on top.

North Dakota- 17
UC Davis- 30

Both teams need a huge rebound from previous week beat downs. Which team responds better?

Post by **SACCAT** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:50 am

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it

Montana 31-21 Hillsboro St. — PSU ain't gonna throw for 549 yards

NoDak 24-35 Davis — Davis needs to regroup, UND needs Dr. McCoy

Cal Poly 35-45 Idaho St. — Both suck at pass defense, but only one really passes

NoCo 34-42 NAU — Could be a shootout… I'll go with the Skydome

Weber 27-21 Montana St. — MSU's kicking issues could cost them here

MSU doesn't have any kicking issues...

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:00 am

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Good GOD if your UM/PSU prediction comes true I might have to just get off eGriz altogether.....
I'd have to visit more frequently.

It's such a shitshow right now it's almost unreadable.

Post by **Silenoz** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:31 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: I'd have to visit more frequently.
It's such a shitshow right now it's almost unreadable.

Why bother? Whenever there's blood in the water, every douche from the other fanbases comes in to mix it up with the regular Griz douches, combining into one giant mega douche that will melt your brain if you try to gaze upon it

Post by **Silenoz** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:33 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:Good GOD if your UM/PSU prediction comes true I might have to just get off eGriz altogether.....

When is the last time we won a road game

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:51 pm

SACCAT wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it

Montana 31-21 Hillsboro St. — PSU ain't gonna throw for 549 yards

NoDak 24-35 Davis — Davis needs to regroup, UND needs Dr. McCoy

Cal Poly 35-45 Idaho St. — Both suck at pass defense, but only one really passes

NoCo 34-42 NAU — Could be a shootout… I'll go with the Skydome

Weber 27-21 Montana St. — MSU's kicking issues could cost them here
MSU doesn't have any kicking issues...

You mean, aside from this?

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:01 pm

Silenoz wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Good GOD if your UM/PSU prediction comes true I might have to just get off eGriz altogether.....
When is the last time we won a road game

UNI last year. But that doesn't really count 'cause...UNI.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:19 pm

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
SACCAT wrote:
MSU doesn't have any kicking issues...

You mean, aside from this?

We have the same kickers we had last year, so that really isn't a problem

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:49 pm

cats2506 wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:

You mean, aside from this?
We have the same kickers we had last year, so that really isn't a problem

They weren't all that good, though. Peppenger was just 2/5 on 40+ kicks last year, and Padmos averaged under 40 a punt.

Jjoey52 · Post by **Jjoey52** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:53 pm

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
cats2506 wrote: We have the same kickers we had last year, so that really isn't a problem
They weren't all that good, though. Peppenger was just 2/5 on 40+ kicks last year, and Padmos averaged under 40 a punt.

Don't care how lousy your kickers are, ISU is worse.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

JALMOND · Post by **JALMOND** » Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:52 pm

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it

Going to see what happens this week when we both take EWU for the win. kalm can't be too happy. We've seen what happens when we pick them to lose.

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:49 am

JALMOND wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it
Going to see what happens this week when we both take EWU for the win. kalm can't be too happy. We've seen what happens when we pick them to lose.

Well, we did both take Sac to cover. Will that jinx them?

Post by **SACCAT** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:06 am

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
cats2506 wrote: We have the same kickers we had last year, so that really isn't a problem
They weren't all that good, though. Peppenger was just 2/5 on 40+ kicks last year, and Padmos averaged under 40 a punt.

I will say it again....We don't have a Kicking issue. Now that our offense is unstoppable, I don't think we will really even need a kicker, but we have about 4 of them, so might as well use them...

Post by **kalm** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:07 am

SACCAT wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:
They weren't all that good, though. Peppenger was just 2/5 on 40+ kicks last year, and Padmos averaged under 40 a punt.
I will say it again....We don't have a Kicking issue. Now that our offense is unstoppable, I don't think we will really even need a kicker, but we have about 4 of them, so might as well use them...

You only kick to avoid running up the score.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:12 am

SACCAT wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:
They weren't all that good, though. Peppenger was just 2/5 on 40+ kicks last year, and Padmos averaged under 40 a punt.
I will say it again....We don't have a Kicking issue. Now that our offense is unstoppable, I don't think we will really even need a kicker, but we have about 4 of them, so might as well use them...

Are they all as douchey as Daly?

Post by **SACCAT** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:19 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
SACCAT wrote:
I will say it again....We don't have a Kicking issue. Now that our offense is unstoppable, I don't think we will really even need a kicker, but we have about 4 of them, so might as well use them...
Are they all as douchey as Daly?

No...We have a limit of one douchey kicker at a time. For someone that missed his first 3 field goals, and a extra point, he sure is a chatty Kathy though...

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:21 am

SACCAT wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
Are they all as douchey as Daly?
No...We have a limit of one douchey kicker at a time. For someone that missed his first 3 field goals, and a extra point, he sure is a chatty Kathy though...

Millennials...

Post by **kalm** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 9:20 am

JALMOND wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac State 24-41 EWU — Showdown game? I doubt it
Going to see what happens this week when we both take EWU for the win. kalm can't be too happy. We've seen what happens when we pick them to lose.

I hate you both...

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-30