She's a better choice than Trump. At least she's sane. Lesser of two evils.That's the greatest irony. Dback will support her all day, knowing full well that's she's as corrupt as they come
Clinton e-mailgate
- JohnStOnge
- Egalitarian
- Posts: 20314
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
- I am a fan of: McNeese State
- A.K.A.: JohnStOnge
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
She is such a skank, has never accomplished anything, threw embassy staff under the bus, ag psychopathic liar and not only that, does anyone want to have their ears drilled with that voice for 8 years.
Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23580
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
CID1990 wrote:His name is Gary Johnson.houndawg wrote:
Willie Nelson.
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Jjoey52 wrote:She is such a skank, has never accomplished anything, threw embassy staff under the bus, ag psychopathic liar and not only that, does anyone want to have their ears drilled with that voice for 8 years.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7006105d ... ons-serverState Department staffers wrestled for weeks in December 2010 over a serious technical problem with then-Secretary Hillary Clinton's home email server, causing them to temporarily disable security features that left the server more vulnerable to hackers, according to emails released Wednesday.
Just weeks later, according to previously disclosed emails, hackers attacked the server, forcing Clinton's staff to shut it down. The next day, one of Clinton's closest aides, Huma Abedin, wrote to other high ranking staff: "Don't email hrc (Clinton) anything sensitive. I can explain more in person."
The emails were released under court order Wednesday to the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch, which has sued the State Department over access to public records related to the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee's service as the nation's top diplomat between 2009 and 2013.
The emails, reviewed by The Associated Press, show that State Department technical staff disabled software intended to block phishing emails that could deliver dangerous viruses. They were trying urgently to resolve an apparent conflict between the server's built-in email delivery features with a version of "ScanMail for Exchange" security software from Trend Micro Inc. that had been installed on her server. Clinton has not previously described any security protections on her server.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- Skjellyfetti
- Anal
- Posts: 14424
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06 ... ition.htmlHillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.
The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25460
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
The immunity got from DOJ applied only to the criminal case FBI is working on, and therefore deals with the matter of whether or not laws governing the use of classified material.Skjellyfetti wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06 ... ition.htmlHillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.
The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time.
Judicial Watch's lawsuit centers around the use of the homegrown server itself and whether it is set up wi the primary purpose of evading laws governing lawful oversight and protection of federal records.
In that respect I don think there's anything else he could hav done there's already a prima facie case against Clinton- no need to risk going down with that ship when your testimony can only move the needle in a bad direction
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Nothing is going to happen to her - DOJ is in her back pocket already and Obama certainly won't direct Lynch to pursue it aggressively. I'm throwing in the towel.
- Pwns
- Level4
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Welcome to the club. I've been getting lonely here for at least the last year or so.ASUG8 wrote:I'm throwing in the towel.
It was absolutely wishful thinking that anything will happen to Hilldog over this. She's as slippery as teflon with petroleum jelly on it.
Now I'm just looking forward to the Clintonites saying that her staying out of trouble means she did nothing wrong and that this is all a continuation of the vast right-wing conspiracy to destroy Hillary because saksism.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
So who are the other 5 people that want to pee in my butt?
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59818
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Conks...play the odds.Grizalltheway wrote:So who are the other 5 people that want to pee in my butt?
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
This is a tough one, especially in our politicized a polarized world. However, if I were Obama I would:ASUG8 wrote:Nothing is going to happen to her - DOJ is in her back pocket already and Obama certainly won't direct Lynch to pursue it aggressively. I'm throwing in the towel.
1) Support whatever the FBI says, even if that means publicly urging the AG to charge Clinton
1a) I think, in doing this, it will help Americans see that there is still Justice AND it'll be a feather in his cap when his legacy is recalled
1b) This will be good because you can get a candidate that actually unites your party and would be a better alternative to Trump.
I doubt any of that wouldhappen, but I would seriously consider it if I were POTUS.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18141
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
You would think he could easily stop blocking the FBI and have them charge her, and then push to get Elizabeth Warren in there - still keep the "I'm with Her" schtick and get someone who's not just a Wall St lackey. That would be some serious hutzpah to pull that off.Ibanez wrote:This is a tough one, especially in our politicized a polarized world. However, if I were Obama I would:ASUG8 wrote:Nothing is going to happen to her - DOJ is in her back pocket already and Obama certainly won't direct Lynch to pursue it aggressively. I'm throwing in the towel.
1) Support whatever the FBI says, even if that means publicly urging the AG to charge Clinton
1a) I think, in doing this, it will help Americans see that there is still Justice AND it'll be a feather in his cap when his legacy is recalled
1b) This will be good because you can get a candidate that actually unites your party and would be a better alternative to Trump.
I doubt any of that wouldhappen, but I would seriously consider it if I were POTUS.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
We're within the 5 month window for the general election - I really can't see a third party on either side able to get any traction at this point.GannonFan wrote:You would think he could easily stop blocking the FBI and have them charge her, and then push to get Elizabeth Warren in there - still keep the "I'm with Her" schtick and get someone who's not just a Wall St lackey. That would be some serious hutzpah to pull that off.Ibanez wrote:
This is a tough one, especially in our politicized a polarized world. However, if I were Obama I would:
1) Support whatever the FBI says, even if that means publicly urging the AG to charge Clinton
1a) I think, in doing this, it will help Americans see that there is still Justice AND it'll be a feather in his cap when his legacy is recalled
1b) This will be good because you can get a candidate that actually unites your party and would be a better alternative to Trump.
I doubt any of that wouldhappen, but I would seriously consider it if I were POTUS.
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
You could say that about Trump and Clinton.ASUG8 wrote:We're within the 5 month window for the general election - I really can't see a third party on either side able to get any traction at this point.GannonFan wrote:
You would think he could easily stop blocking the FBI and have them charge her, and then push to get Elizabeth Warren in there - still keep the "I'm with Her" schtick and get someone who's not just a Wall St lackey. That would be some serious hutzpah to pull that off.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
I kind of just did.Ibanez wrote:You could say that about Trump and Clinton.ASUG8 wrote:
We're within the 5 month window for the general election - I really can't see a third party on either side able to get any traction at this point.
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Well, I said it betterer.ASUG8 wrote:I kind of just did.Ibanez wrote: You could say that about Trump and Clinton.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
So Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch bumped into each other at the airport.
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... uma-abedinA top aide to Hillary Clinton said the former secretary of state’s use of a private e-mail server to conduct government business on at least one occasion got in the way of Clinton’s work and left the aide frustrated, according to a transcript of the aide’s deposition released Wednesday.
Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and now the vice chair of her presidential campaign, was being deposed about the context of a November 2010 e-mail she sent Clinton that they “should talk about putting you on state email or releasing your email address to the department so you are not going to spam.” Prompting the note, according to the e-mail chain released last week by the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, was a missed scheduled phone call, one of a number of communications mishaps detailed in Clinton's 55,000-page e-mail record.
Clinton responded in the 2010 exchange that she could get a “separate address or device” but said she didn’t “want any risk of the personal being accessible,” according to the e-mail chain. Abedin replied that the missed communications were “not a good system.”
“She seems frustrated because she's not able to do her job,” Abedin said, according to the transcript. “I seem frustrated back because I'm not.”
Abedin testified that “the personal” referred to non-government messages Clinton was also exchanging via the e-mail address rather than any improper treatment of government records.
“I would imagine anybody who has personal e-mail doesn't want that personal e-mail to be read by anybody else,” she said in the transcript.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
For half an hour. Talking about grandchildren. Allegedly.CAA Flagship wrote:So Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch bumped into each other at the airport.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Bad optics for sure but there was never plan, nor will will anything change the fact that an indictment will not come so I don't really put much stock into this meeting.Ivytalk wrote:For half an hour. Talking about grandchildren. Allegedly.CAA Flagship wrote:So Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch bumped into each other at the airport.
On the spandos conspiracy theory rating, this is a 0.693 out of 10.
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
SDHornet wrote:Bad optics for sure but there was never plan, nor will will anything change the fact that an indictment will not come so I don't really put much stock into this meeting.Ivytalk wrote:
For half an hour. Talking about grandchildren. Allegedly.
On the spandos conspiracy theory rating, this is a 0.693 out of 10.
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/b ... nch-224972Reid and Schumer bristled when asked if Lynch's meetings feeds critics more ammunition to attack Hillary Clinton during the same week that Republicans teed off on her over her handling of the Benghazi attacks.
"Look at the other side. You've got Donald Trump. So we're satisfied with our candidate. I think she's doing pretty damn good," Reid said.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/b ... z4D4qoS738
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
When in doubt, deflect, deflect, deflect!
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Clinton e-mailgate
Maybe Bill asked Loretta for a date.SDHornet wrote:Bad optics for sure but there was never plan, nor will will anything change the fact that an indictment will not come so I don't really put much stock into this meeting.Ivytalk wrote:
For half an hour. Talking about grandchildren. Allegedly.
On the spandos conspiracy theory rating, this is a 0.693 out of 10.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.