Tate is going to take some numbers away from Alshon. Carson will be inclined to get Tate a touchdown in his first game.grizzaholic wrote:Need info on whether to play A. Jeffery or T.Y. Hilton this week.
Therefore, Hilton.
Tate is going to take some numbers away from Alshon. Carson will be inclined to get Tate a touchdown in his first game.grizzaholic wrote:Need info on whether to play A. Jeffery or T.Y. Hilton this week.
Whatever choice you make, there's a 50/50 chance it'll be the wrong one.grizzaholic wrote:Ok.
I will be fine this week and next. Then the final push for the championship will occur.93henfan wrote:Whatever choice you make, there's a 50/50 chance it'll be the wrong one.grizzaholic wrote:Ok.
The Panthers crapped the bed worse than the BengalsChizzang wrote:Two teams I though would play hard but just folded were
1) The Bengals
2) The Patriots
both looked completely uninterested in playing with the effort required to win
The Cardinals played their butts off in a loss but battled
The Bills played great and the Cleveland Browns played their asses off
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGrizalltheway wrote:Where you at Vidav
PS I really love the Cowboys linebackers. Used to be Lee was hurt and they stunk. Now with Smith and Vander-Esch they are young and fast. It is amazing.Vidav wrote:WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGrizalltheway wrote:Where you at Vidav
I think I figured it out Flaggy. I've watched the Redskins for years lose game after game after game where they were in it late. They are using up all their chits in one season. I've never seen a worse looking 6-3 team in my life. They honestly should be 3-6 right now... but they're not and it is much more fun to listen to sports talk radio when they are in first place... and then get slaughtered next week by the Texans.CAA Flagship wrote:Redskins
Yes, they are a bad 6-3 team. But it is not right to say they should be 3-6. "Could" yes, not "should".89Hen wrote:I think I figured it out Flaggy. I've watched the Redskins for years lose game after game after game where they were in it late. They are using up all their chits in one season. I've never seen a worse looking 6-3 team in my life. They honestly should be 3-6 right now... but they're not and it is much more fun to listen to sports talk radio when they are in first place... and then get slaughtered next week by the Texans.CAA Flagship wrote:Redskins
They have the 2nd easiest schedule remaining. They should finish no worse than 10-6.CAA Flagship wrote:Now the reason I say "could" instead of "should" is because breaks rarely go with or against teams 100% of the time. So far, the breaks have been with the Redskins. That will likely even out soon and they will find themselves around .500.
I'm not banking on that. I'd be thrilled with 9-7.89Hen wrote:They have the 2nd easiest schedule remaining. They should finish no worse than 10-6.CAA Flagship wrote:Now the reason I say "could" instead of "should" is because breaks rarely go with or against teams 100% of the time. So far, the breaks have been with the Redskins. That will likely even out soon and they will find themselves around .500.
Snap infraction.CAA Flagship wrote:I'm not banking on that. I'd be thrilled with 9-7.89Hen wrote: They have the 2nd easiest schedule remaining. They should finish no worse than 10-6.
Must beat the Eagles at least once.
Must beat the Giants at home.
Hopefully the Jags quit by week 15.
Can't see beating Eagles twice, or beating Cowboys (on road), Tennessee, or Houston.
This ^ is true...CAA Flagship wrote: this is an 8-8 league. And the difference between 6-10 and 10-6 is 4 plays (and usually those 4 plays are low probability plays).
Vidav wrote:This wasn't called a hold. But they did talk about how strong Wentz was for not getting sacked.
I'm no Spandos but no Cowboys opponent has been called for offensive holding since week 1. Which is a continuation of a lack of holding calls from last year.CAA Flagship wrote:Vidav wrote:This wasn't called a hold. But they did talk about how strong Wentz was for not getting sacked.
I was saying the same thing while watching that replay. Not sure how anyone can miss that.
At this point I have to concede on the injury bug in Philly...93henfan wrote:Cooper Kupp and Ronald Darby both to IR with ACL tears.
FWIW, this past season 17 of 30 MLB teams finished between 91-71 and 71-91 (same winning percentages you're citing) while only 11 of 32 NFL teams finished between 9-7 and 7-9.Chizzang wrote:in the end a huge portion of the NFL ends the season somewhere in between 7-9 and 9-7
so a third of the league lands around .50089Hen wrote:FWIW, this past season 17 of 30 MLB teams finished between 91-71 and 71-91 (same winning percentages you're citing) while only 11 of 32 NFL teams finished between 9-7 and 7-9.Chizzang wrote:in the end a huge portion of the NFL ends the season somewhere in between 7-9 and 9-7