Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

css75 wrote:

Your total lack of spiritual knowledge is amazing.

css75 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Jesus remains a liberal, peace and neighbor loving, socialist hippie?

Cool! I like that guy!

He also hated sin.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ibanez wrote:Do you know why eggs are apart of Easter? Go educate yourself, it’s interesting.

css75 wrote:

Ibanez wrote: Yeah... I’ve heard that. If that were so, we wouldn’t have Christians trying to hang up those useless 10 Commandments everywhere. Hell, my neighbor 5 houses down has a statue in his front yard, easily 4 ft high, with those commandment.

If those laws were “kaput”, slavers wouldn’t have used Exodus as a way to justify slavery.

If those laws were “kaput”, Christians wouldn’t be trotting out OT laws to condemn homosexuals and justify discrimination.

Yet, for laws that are supposedly “kaput” they are trotted out an awful lot- by both church leaders and lay people.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your total lack of spiritual knowledge is amazing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

∞∞∞ wrote:

Ibanez wrote:Do you know why eggs are apart of Easter? Go educate yourself, it’s interesting.

I figured it has to do with rebirth, but I looked it up and you're right, the history is interesting.

Chizzang wrote:

css75 wrote:

Your total lack of spiritual knowledge is amazing.

Please define "Spiritual Knowledge"

Spoiler: show

I've never mentioned this on this board but before college, I strongly considered entering the priesthood. I was a hardcore Catholic.

Ibanez wrote:

css75 wrote:

Your total lack of spiritual knowledge is amazing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Now that is just critical and the wrong attitude. I'm no scholar, but having graduated from Catholic schools (k-12), youth groups, weekly mass and multiple religious courses in college and afterwards, I feel i have a better understanding of religions and Christianity than most. Maybe not Joltin Joe, but still better than most.


And my questions were meant to point out the hypocrisy of the whole thing. Something you've missed.

The NT may have made the laws of the OT "kaput" (that was your word) but modern day Christians still fall back on them for various reasons.

Ibanez wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Please define "Spiritual Knowledge"

Believing the way he believes and not forming my own opinions based on years of education, research and participation.

Spoiler: show

I've never mentioned this on this board but before college, I strongly considered entering the priesthood. I was a hardcore Catholic.

css75 wrote:

Ibanez wrote: Now that is just critical and the wrong attitude. I'm no scholar, but having graduated from Catholic schools (k-12), youth groups, weekly mass and multiple religious courses in college and afterwards, I feel i have a better understanding of religions and Christianity than most. Maybe not Joltin Joe, but still better than most.


And my questions were meant to point out the hypocrisy of the whole thing. Something you've missed.

The NT may have made the laws of the OT "kaput" (that was your word) but modern day Christians still fall back on them for various reasons.

To answer you and Chizzang, while the NT message regarding homosexuality forbids the killing of them (OT commands it),the NT still considers it a sin. Romans 1 is quite clear. Personally, it makes no difference to me what anyone does, just stating the biblical position.

Some Christians are a bit obnoxious with the using of OT law.

Chizzang wrote:

css75 wrote:
To answer you and Chizzang, while the NT message regarding homosexuality forbids the killing of them (OT commands it),the NT still considers it a sin. Romans 1 is quite clear. Personally, it makes no difference to me what anyone does, just stating the biblical position.

Some Christians are a bit obnoxious with the using of OT law.

So the apostle Paul is your God then..?

css75 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
So the apostle Paul is your God then..?

Of course not.

Chizzang wrote:

css75 wrote:
Of course not.

But you believe Paul decides what a sin is for all humans on earth

CID1990 wrote:Hey wait a sec

I just realized that the title of this thread was that "evolution takes a faceplant"

I thought the idea of intelligent design actually incorporates evolution

that said, Im not seeing how evolution has been repudiated here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SeattleGriz wrote:

CID1990 wrote:Hey wait a sec

I just realized that the title of this thread was that "evolution takes a faceplant"

I thought the idea of intelligent design actually incorporates evolution

that said, Im not seeing how evolution has been repudiated here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was letting everyone punch themselves out before coming back to that.

SeattleGriz wrote:

CID1990 wrote:Hey wait a sec

I just realized that the title of this thread was that "evolution takes a faceplant"

I thought the idea of intelligent design actually incorporates evolution

that said, Im not seeing how evolution has been repudiated here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was letting everyone punch themselves out before coming back to that.

kalm wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:I was letting everyone punch themselves out before coming back to that.

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:

Can you not post busted links?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:I was letting everyone punch themselves out before coming back to that.

It seems you have already tipped your hand as a proponent of the bearded Santa in the sky

Evolution isn't a part of V'ger's grand design?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SeattleGriz wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
It seems you have already tipped your hand as a proponent of the bearded Santa in the sky

Evolution isn't a part of V'ger's grand design?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everyone seems to have missed how I've worded my statement. Evolution has taken a faceplant due to it's now proven incorrect prediction that our DNA is filled with junk.

The science for such was completed by those not in the intelligent design field.

Simple analogy. You have an line, but forgot the whole y=mx + b thing, so you have to make a prediction as to what your y and x are. What do you do with your incorrect predictions? You throw them out.

UNI88 wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Everyone seems to have missed how I've worded my statement. Evolution has taken a faceplant due to it's now proven incorrect prediction that our DNA is filled with junk.

The science for such was completed by those not in the intelligent design field.

Simple analogy. You have an line, but forgot the whole y=mx + b thing, so you have to make a prediction as to what your y and x are. What do you do with your incorrect predictions? You throw them out.

How much do you think the loss of junk DNA damages the credibility of evolution? I don't think it's quite as damaging as carbon dating is to the whole 6,000 year old planet theory of intelligent design.

css75 wrote:

Ibanez wrote: Now that is just critical and the wrong attitude. I'm no scholar, but having graduated from Catholic schools (k-12), youth groups, weekly mass and multiple religious courses in college and afterwards, I feel i have a better understanding of religions and Christianity than most. Maybe not Joltin Joe, but still better than most.


And my questions were meant to point out the hypocrisy of the whole thing. Something you've missed.

The NT may have made the laws of the OT "kaput" (that was your word) but modern day Christians still fall back on them for various reasons.

To answer you and Chizzang, while the NT message regarding homosexuality forbids the killing of them (OT commands it),the NT still considers it a sin. Romans 1 is quite clear. Personally, it makes no difference to me what anyone does, just stating the biblical position.

Some Christians are a bit obnoxious with the using of OT law.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Chizzang wrote:Apparently css75 tapped out...
That was easy