So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
- Pwns
- Level4
- Posts: 7274
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Here's a summary of left-wing arguments/complaints I've seen.
1. You're not really pro-life because you don't support universal health care, free daycare, don't do enough to feed starving children in Ehtiopia, won't save the whales, etc.
2. If you don't like abortions don't have them. Also, if you don't like child abuse, don't beat your children. Everyone should have the right to determine their own version of right and wrong without the government stepping in to protect the rights of others.
3. What's the point of having any laws when they'll be broken anyways?
4. What's the difference between an abortion and a tonsillectomy anyways?
5. War on wimmin™. *guffaw*
All pitiful. What's funny is very politically incorrect azzholes like Cluck U honestly put up more cogent arguments than they do.
The only question that matters is when life begins, and I don't claim to have a good answer, but I know that "birth" is a garbage, immoral, and unscientific answer. Everything else is moral relativity and lazy thinking.
1. You're not really pro-life because you don't support universal health care, free daycare, don't do enough to feed starving children in Ehtiopia, won't save the whales, etc.
2. If you don't like abortions don't have them. Also, if you don't like child abuse, don't beat your children. Everyone should have the right to determine their own version of right and wrong without the government stepping in to protect the rights of others.
3. What's the point of having any laws when they'll be broken anyways?
4. What's the difference between an abortion and a tonsillectomy anyways?
5. War on wimmin™. *guffaw*
All pitiful. What's funny is very politically incorrect azzholes like Cluck U honestly put up more cogent arguments than they do.
The only question that matters is when life begins, and I don't claim to have a good answer, but I know that "birth" is a garbage, immoral, and unscientific answer. Everything else is moral relativity and lazy thinking.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
When the lump gets arms and legs and the head stops looking like ET, it starts to get sort of cute. I don’t like seeing them get sucked out at that point.
What do I win?
What do I win?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
1-2)Why can't we have laws in place to protect peoples health and safety - even if it's a decision we might not agree? I agree - practice some restraint and don't have sex unless you're able to care for the child but i'm also a realist and understand that people will have sex in the heat of the moment and not wear a condom. Or they'll just bang with reckless abandon. But let's make that difficult decision safe.Pwns wrote:Here's a summary of left-wing arguments/complaints I've seen.
1. You're not really pro-life because you don't support universal health care, free daycare, don't do enough to feed starving children in Ehtiopia, won't save the whales, etc.
2. If you don't like abortions don't have them. Also, if you don't like child abuse, don't beat your children. Everyone should have the right to determine their own version of right and wrong without the government stepping in to protect the rights of others.
3. What's the point of having any laws when they'll be broken anyways?
4. What's the difference between an abortion and a tonsillectomy anyways?
5. War on wimmin™. *guffaw*
All pitiful. What's funny is very politically incorrect azzholes like Cluck U honestly put up more cogent arguments than they do.
The only question that matters is when life begins, and I don't claim to have a good answer, but I know that "birth" is a garbage, immoral, and unscientific answer. Everything else is moral relativity and lazy thinking.
3) We break laws every day. We speed, occasionally steal. I'm not sure if it's about the principle.
4) That's an AZ analogy there. Damn...
5) I never understood that one.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
But the pro-choice side usually skips that part of the discussion, yet it's really the only one that matters.Pwns wrote:The only question that matters is when life begins, and I don't claim to have a good answer, but I know that "birth" is a garbage, immoral, and unscientific answer. Everything else is moral relativity and lazy thinking.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Actually, there’s much more to the discussion of course. Many things matter.89Hen wrote:But the pro-choice side usually skips that part of the discussion, yet it's really the only one that matters.Pwns wrote:The only question that matters is when life begins, and I don't claim to have a good answer, but I know that "birth" is a garbage, immoral, and unscientific answer. Everything else is moral relativity and lazy thinking.
That’s why it’s such a contentious issue.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Yes, like who pays for it.93henfan wrote:Actually, there’s much more to the discussion of course. Many things matter.89Hen wrote: But the pro-choice side usually skips that part of the discussion, yet it's really the only one that matters.
That’s why it’s such a contentious issue.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
No, there's really not. Does the baby have rights is the primary question, everything else is a distant second. More distant than the second place to California in everything.93henfan wrote:Actually, there’s much more to the discussion of course. Many things matter.89Hen wrote: But the pro-choice side usually skips that part of the discussion, yet it's really the only one that matters.
That’s why it’s such a contentious issue.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28000
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Simple answer. States' rights. Let the states decide..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Does the mother have rights?89Hen wrote:No, there's really not. Does the baby have rights is the primary question, everything else is a distant second. More distant than the second place to California in everything.93henfan wrote:
Actually, there’s much more to the discussion of course. Many things matter.
That’s why it’s such a contentious issue.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
When it's a collection of cells i'm ok with aborting. Not when it has a beating heart.93henfan wrote:When the lump gets arms and legs and the head stops looking like ET, it starts to get sort of cute. I don’t like seeing them get sucked out at that point.
What do I win?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Ibanez wrote:When it's a collection of cells i'm ok with aborting. Not when it has a beating heart.93henfan wrote:When the lump gets arms and legs and the head stops looking like ET, it starts to get sort of cute. I don’t like seeing them get sucked out at that point.
What do I win?
Do you run around the local ditches saving tadpoles?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
See, you're skipping ahead again.93henfan wrote:Does the mother have rights?89Hen wrote: No, there's really not. Does the baby have rights is the primary question, everything else is a distant second. More distant than the second place to California in everything.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
What does she look like?93henfan wrote:Does the mother have rights?89Hen wrote: No, there's really not. Does the baby have rights is the primary question, everything else is a distant second. More distant than the second place to California in everything.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
I think you are.89Hen wrote:See, you're skipping ahead again.93henfan wrote:
Does the mother have rights?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Yes. Yes I do. I also stop for squirrels, children and dogs.93henfan wrote:Ibanez wrote: When it's a collection of cells i'm ok with aborting. Not when it has a beating heart.
Do you run around the local ditches saving tadpoles?
But not cats...fuck them!
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Nope. There is only one person being terminated and it aint her.93henfan wrote:I think you are.89Hen wrote: See, you're skipping ahead again.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Sometimes it’s better to remove the lump before it becomes a viable human being or harms the mother. The earlier the better.89Hen wrote:Nope. There is only one person being terminated and it aint her.93henfan wrote:
I think you are.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
93henfan wrote:Sometimes it’s better to remove the lump before it becomes a viable human being or harms the mother. The earlier the better.89Hen wrote: Nope. There is only one person being terminated and it aint her.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Go fish elsewhere.93henfan wrote:Sometimes it’s better to remove the lump before it becomes a viable human being or harms the mother. The earlier the better.89Hen wrote: Nope. There is only one person being terminated and it aint her.
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Probably the one issue I side with the religious nutjobs on
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18066
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
It's an area where the left decides to eschew science (even though they view the right as the Luddites) to argue their point and the right eschews compassion and forward thinking to argue their point. There's no question that life begins at conception - those collections of cells are just the first step of what is a human. Science doesn't really argue against that. The issue is today, medical science is not capable of supporting and protecting that life as it develops if it needs to leave the womb before the 20-24 week threshold. That's why the first trimester has been used by the courts as the rough boundary line between when an elective abortion can occur and when it can't (unless there's a medical reason).
That's not always been the case, and science has clearly been moving into the direction of earlier and earlier in terms of out of womb viability. Extrapolate it out, and somewhere in the future viability will be at the point of conception. That's where the right gets into trouble. If we get to that point, what are we going to do with all the unwanted children that then exist from pregnancies that used to be aborted? The religious right has been very paltry in terms of their support of families who decide to keep their babies, and even more so in terms of children put up for adoption from women who carry to full term. How are we going to support the millions of extra children, many of who will be given up to the state, who are now not being aborted?
I'm pro-life, I don't like abortion at all - we're taking a human life when one is performed. But, in light of the limitations of medical science and in light of the even bigger question of how do we support the lives of the families and children that will be more numerous with the abolition of abortion, I'd leave it in place for the time being. But science is moving forward, so that extrapolation will become reality sooner than we think. Better to start planning for it now.
That's not always been the case, and science has clearly been moving into the direction of earlier and earlier in terms of out of womb viability. Extrapolate it out, and somewhere in the future viability will be at the point of conception. That's where the right gets into trouble. If we get to that point, what are we going to do with all the unwanted children that then exist from pregnancies that used to be aborted? The religious right has been very paltry in terms of their support of families who decide to keep their babies, and even more so in terms of children put up for adoption from women who carry to full term. How are we going to support the millions of extra children, many of who will be given up to the state, who are now not being aborted?
I'm pro-life, I don't like abortion at all - we're taking a human life when one is performed. But, in light of the limitations of medical science and in light of the even bigger question of how do we support the lives of the families and children that will be more numerous with the abolition of abortion, I'd leave it in place for the time being. But science is moving forward, so that extrapolation will become reality sooner than we think. Better to start planning for it now.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
I’m not fishing at all. Nobody wins in this debate, but you try to every time. It’s always your trigger issue, which I fully understand when you were indoctrinated starting at birth in CatholIc dogma.89Hen wrote:Go fish elsewhere.93henfan wrote:
Sometimes it’s better to remove the lump before it becomes a viable human being or harms the mother. The earlier the better.
You’re doing what you’ve been told. I don’t hold it against you, as long as you’re not shooting doctors or bombing medical facilities.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
Eat a dick and go fish elsewhere.93henfan wrote:I’m not fishing at all. Nobody wins in this debate, but you try to every time. It’s always your trigger issue, which I fully understand when you were indoctrinated starting at birth in CatholIc dogma.89Hen wrote: Go fish elsewhere.
You’re doing what you’ve been told. I don’t hold it against you, as long as you’re not shooting doctors or bombing medical facilities.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: So, the abortion issue is now back in the limelight...
I see that more as trouble for the pro-choice crowd.GannonFan wrote:Extrapolate it out, and somewhere in the future viability will be at the point of conception. That's where the right gets into trouble.