The Democratic Party...

[kalm]

Our great nation has killed nazis before we can kill nazis again. Right out in the street will be just fine, these scumbags will find out where the real silent majority lines up.

Gosh even I remember the days when even the real Nazis were faux Nazis... 50 rednecks in brownshirts at some rally in Indiana

now theyre people who don't serve gluten free

the horror


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for speaking out.

Just because you’re not celiac doesn’t mean they won’t come for you someday...

[BDKJMU]

Turns out Maxin doesnt like being confronted. I guess what’s good for the goose isnt good for the gander..

phpBB [video]

[JohnStOnge]

Turns out Maxin doesnt like being confronted. I guess what’s good for the goose isnt good for the gander..

phpBB [video]

False Premises. It's not about being a conservative. It's about being a bald faced liar who is trying to undermine the institutions that protect us from Autocracy. And that's what Sarah Sanders and the rest of the people who are in the business of facilitating the Trump atrocity do every day. Sanders gets up before the free press every day and lies repeatedly.

[css75]

Turns out Maxin doesnt like being confronted. I guess what’s good for the goose isnt good for the gander..

phpBB [video]

False Premises. It's not about being a conservative. It's about being a bald faced liar who is trying to undermine the institutions that protect us from Autocracy. And that's what Sarah Sanders and the rest of the people who are in the business of facilitating the Trump atrocity do every day. Sanders gets up before the free press every day and lies repeatedly.

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[JohnStOnge]

False Premises. It's not about being a conservative. It's about being a bald faced liar who is trying to undermine the institutions that protect us from Autocracy. And that's what Sarah Sanders and the rest of the people who are in the business of facilitating the Trump atrocity do every day. Sanders gets up before the free press every day and lies repeatedly.

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

[Ivytalk]

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

Indeed. A situation that will get worse once the illiterate Democrat socialist hordes gut the very institutions that you profess to love. What a piece of work you are.

[css75]

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

Just what do you want policy wise?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[AZGrizFan]

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

And guess what? If we had Hildabeast as president, we’d have the most dishonest president of the modern era in office right now?

NO thanks. I’ll take the country’s chances with Trump.

[BDKJMU]

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

[Baldy]

Tell us more John, this is riveting new info from you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

What institutions are being attacked and how?

Examples, please.

[kalm]

Riveting or new is not the point. If it's old or repeated it's still the truth. We have the most dishonest President of the modern era in office right now. And he and his allies are attacking the institutions that protect us from Autocracy/Totalitarianism. It's a very bad situation.

Indeed. A situation that will get worse once the illiterate Democrat socialist hordes gut the very institutions that you profess to love. What a piece of work you are.

* Democratic Socialist

or

* Democrat/socialist

Fucking Harvard kids....

[Ibanez]

Kennedy's retirement underscores the problems that are within the Democratic Party. They fumbled the 2016 Election, they keep attacking the POTUS instead of the issues and now have to live impotently in Government - that is until they retake the White House and/or Congress. Which - won't be easy. Also, they have to live with the fact that they screwed their shot at getting at least 2 justices on the bench.

Trump has secured his place in American History. He'll get at least 2 people on the bench - possibly a few more if Bader dies or Thomas retires.

That said - I do find it hypocritical of the Republicans if they confirm someone before the elections. I know the midterms aren't the same as the Presidential election, but they stalled Obama over the same thing. Obama and the Dem's should've fought harder for Garland.

[AZGrizFan]

Kennedy's retirement underscores the problems that are within the Democratic Party. They fumbled the 2016 Election, they keep attacking the POTUS instead of the issues and now have to live impotently in Government - that is until they retake the White House and/or Congress. Which - won't be easy. Also, they have to live with the fact that they screwed their shot at getting at least 2 justices on the bench.

Trump has secured his place in American History. He'll get at least 2 people on the bench - possibly a few more if Bader dies or Thomas retires.

That said - I do find it hypocritical of the Republicans if they confirm someone before the elections. I know the midterms aren't the same as the Presidential election, but they stalled Obama over the same thing. Obama and the Dem's should've fought harder for Garland.

It's June.

[Ibanez]

Kennedy's retirement underscores the problems that are within the Democratic Party. They fumbled the 2016 Election, they keep attacking the POTUS instead of the issues and now have to live impotently in Government - that is until they retake the White House and/or Congress. Which - won't be easy. Also, they have to live with the fact that they screwed their shot at getting at least 2 justices on the bench.

Trump has secured his place in American History. He'll get at least 2 people on the bench - possibly a few more if Bader dies or Thomas retires.

That said - I do find it hypocritical of the Republicans if they confirm someone before the elections. I know the midterms aren't the same as the Presidential election, but they stalled Obama over the same thing. Obama and the Dem's should've fought harder for Garland.

It's June.

What's your point? Scalia died in February 2016. Garland was nominated in March 2016. McConnell said,

The American people may well elect a President who decides to nominate Judge Garland for Senate consideration, The next President may also nominate someone very different. Either way, our view is this: Give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy.”

.

This year it's the American people who may well elect a new Congress. It's an election year.

So which is it - do you want the people to have a voice or do you just want to stick it to the Dems?

[CAA Flagship]

That said - I do find it hypocritical of the Republicans if they confirm someone before the elections. I know the midterms aren't the same as the Presidential election, but they stalled Obama over the same thing. Obama and the Dem's should've fought harder for Garland.

Wasn't it the Donks that were the origin of the rule that allowed the Conks the option of stalling in the final year of a Presidential term?

[AZGrizFan]

It's June.

What's your point? Scalia died in February 2016. Garland was nominated in March 2016. McConnell said,

The American people may well elect a President who decides to nominate Judge Garland for Senate consideration, The next President may also nominate someone very different. Either way, our view is this: Give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy.”

.

This year it's the American people who may well elect a new Congress. It's an election year.

So which is it - do you want the people to have a voice or do you just want to stick it to the Dems?

They vote on new congressmen every two years. Not the same thing.

[Ibanez]

That said - I do find it hypocritical of the Republicans if they confirm someone before the elections. I know the midterms aren't the same as the Presidential election, but they stalled Obama over the same thing. Obama and the Dem's should've fought harder for Garland.

Wasn't it the Donks that were the origin of the rule that allowed the Conks the option of stalling in the final year of a Presidential term?

I don't know about that. But 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Wasn't Kagan confirmed during an election year? Regardless, Conks that set the precedent. I guess that means they don't have to follow it.

[Ibanez]

What's your point? Scalia died in February 2016. Garland was nominated in March 2016. McConnell said, .

This year it's the American people who may well elect a new Congress. It's an election year.

So which is it - do you want the people to have a voice or do you just want to stick it to the Dems?

They vote on new congressmen every two years. Not the same thing.

And what do you think those congressmen do?

It's still an election year. You're splitting hairs. 23 Senators are up for election. 10 are Dems and 2 indy's. It's the same principle (I know, principles elude Congress).

[CAA Flagship]

Wasn't it the Donks that were the origin of the rule that allowed the Conks the option of stalling in the final year of a Presidential term?

I don't know about that. But 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Wasn't Kagan confirmed during an election year? Regardless, Conks that set the precedent. I guess that means they don't have to follow it.

The rule is on the nominator, not the confirmers. You are trying to cut the cake with an ice cream scoop.

[AZGrizFan]

They vote on new congressmen every two years. Not the same thing.

And what do you think those congressmen do?

It's still an election year. You're splitting hairs. 23 Senators are up for election. 10 are Dems and 2 indy's. It's the same principle (I know, principles elude Congress).

They don't do anything.

[Ibanez]

I don't know about that. But 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Wasn't Kagan confirmed during an election year? Regardless, Conks that set the precedent. I guess that means they don't have to follow it.

The rule is on the nominator, not the confirmers. You are trying to cut the cake with an ice cream scoop.

What rule are we talking about - I think i'm missing what you're saying?

The President nominates and the Senate confirms. Both are elected by the people and this is an election year.

McConnell stalled Garlands confirmation b/c he wanted to wait to see who would be President. If it was a Democrat and the GOP retained Congress, they'd get a watered down justice that was still a liberal.

The motive was painstakingly obvious. They didn't give a shit about the people having a say. They wanted to make sure they didn't put a D on the bench when they could have an R within a year.

[AZGrizFan]

The rule is on the nominator, not the confirmers. You are trying to cut the cake with an ice cream scoop.

What rule are we talking about - I think i'm missing what you're saying?

The President nominates and the Senate confirms. Both are elected by the people and this is an election year.

McConnell stalled Garlands confirmation b/c he wanted to wait to see who would be President. If it was a Democrat and the GOP retained Congress, they'd get a watered down justice that was still a liberal.

The motive was painstakingly obvious. They didn't give a shit about the people having a say. They wanted to make sure they didn't put a D on the bench when they could have an R within a year.

Exactly. And the president isn't up for reelection this year. So, apples and cumquats.

[Ibanez]

And what do you think those congressmen do?

It's still an election year. You're splitting hairs. 23 Senators are up for election. 10 are Dems and 2 indy's. It's the same principle (I know, principles elude Congress).

They don't do anything.

Touche.

Constitutionally, they confirm. This is still an election year where the peoples will could change the direction of Congress (preferably the Senate if you're a Democrat).

[Ibanez]

What rule are we talking about - I think i'm missing what you're saying?

The President nominates and the Senate confirms. Both are elected by the people and this is an election year.

McConnell stalled Garlands confirmation b/c he wanted to wait to see who would be President. If it was a Democrat and the GOP retained Congress, they'd get a watered down justice that was still a liberal.

The motive was painstakingly obvious. They didn't give a shit about the people having a say. They wanted to make sure they didn't put a D on the bench when they could have an R within a year.

Exactly. And the president isn't up for reelection this year. So, apples and cumquats.

Give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy

Millions of people are going to vote in 4 months for the representatives that will confirm. That's equally, if not more important.


That's my opinion. I know the partisan nature of politics.

[AZGrizFan]

Exactly. And the president isn't up for reelection this year. So, apples and cumquats.

Give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy

Millions of people are going to vote in 4 months for the representatives that will confirm. That's equally, if not more important.


That's my opinion. I know the partisan nature of politics.

The hard work of government must plow forward. No time to rest. Onward and upward. Get busy livin' or get busy dyin'. No time like the present. Now or never. Dont' let any moss grow under your feet.