BDKJMU wrote:
Trust Comey?
-You had the head of an investigative agency inappropriately hold a press conference (not his job to make such an announcement).
-Laid out the crimes that someone committed (the threshold of gross negligence was clearly met) as if he was making a closing argument.
-Said that he was recommending that person not be charged, mentioning that intent couldn't be proven (completely irrelevant since intent isn't part of the statute).
-Claimed that no prosecutor would bring charges in this case, when their was reportedly unanimity among the investigators & lawyers working the investigation that charges shouldn't be brought, with a # of former federal prosecutors later saying the same thing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10 ... sider.html
But whether or not she knew her server had classified info is IRRELEVANT. Gross negligence is the standard, not intent. She either knew the server had classified info, or she would have had to have been incredibly incompetent not to have known. Either way she was violating the law:
"18 USC 793, paragraph F (1)
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
Only 110 or whatever might have been marked classified at the time, but over 2000 contained classified material. You would have to suspend belief & have your head buried in the sand to think she didn't know her e-mails contained classified info.
She was a former Senator & the Sec of State, not some low level govt employee. And she would have known that writing classified intelligence information into an unclassified email does not make the information unclassified.
Clinton e-mail lies:
Didn’t send or receive any e-mails that were classified "at the time".-Lie
Didn’t send or receive any e-mails “marked classified” at the time.- Lie
Turned over all of her work-related e-mails.- Lie
Claimed she only used 1 device- Lie
Claimed use of a private server and e-mail domain were legally permitted- Lie.
All her e-mails were immediately captured by @.gov addresses.-Lie
Claimed was never served a subpoena on her e-mail use.-Lie
And this is just one area of Clintons lies and corruption. But keep clinging to: