Grizalltheway wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: If you resist to persist, I will be happy to assist.
He may be awesome, but I hope he's not farsighted.
Post bigger pictures, dipshit. There are a lot of old people on this site.
Grizalltheway wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: If you resist to persist, I will be happy to assist.
This. Fuck.93henfan wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
He may be awesome, but I hope he's not farsighted.
Post bigger pictures, dipshit. There are a lot of old people on this site.
Don't patronize us.Grizalltheway wrote:Thank you for your input. I'll take it under advisement.
I have a list going of people that need to leave NOW! How big do you think the space ship will be?JohnStOnge wrote:I don't know about the specifics of how long we have but I do believe that if we want to sustain our species a time will come when we will need to find other worlds to spread out onto.
VictorG wrote:I have a list going of people that need to leave NOW! How big do you think the space ship will be?JohnStOnge wrote:I don't know about the specifics of how long we have but I do believe that if we want to sustain our species a time will come when we will need to find other worlds to spread out onto.
I have a feeling whatever planet sent him here made sure it was a one way trip.Ivytalk wrote:I vote to give JSO his own spaceship.
I can just imagine 583 years from now there'll be quite the hysteria in the lead-up to the year that that ancient sage from centuries ago, Hawking, said the world was going to end. He'll be like that future world's version of the Mayan Calendar.AZGrizFan wrote:583 years? That's very....uh....."specific"?
Probably a planet inhabited by only small childrenGrizalltheway wrote:I have a feeling whatever planet sent him here made sure it was a one way trip.Ivytalk wrote:I vote to give JSO his own spaceship.
Kind of like Egriz..........bandl wrote: Probably a planet inhabited by only small children
There's a pretty heated debate about how effective centrifugal force is in space...Pwns wrote:I have a feeling the physics is going to be much more challenging than the physiology. You can use a centripetal force to create gravity. I have no idea how you travel hundreds of trillions of miles without basically having a voyage that will have to span generations, unless there's some property of space we don't know about that can be exploited.Chizzang wrote:We ain't leaving this solar system...
Our choices are our own moon and Mars... and that's it
We aren't built to be in space for very long periods - gravity is a huge part of our DNA
and leaving this solar system even at 100X the speed of light won't get us anywhere anytime soon...
Kind of how an overweight person looks down right skinny when standing next to an incredibly obese person?Chizzang wrote: As mass changes based on its proximity to other mass
GannonFan wrote:Kind of how an overweight person looks down right skinny when standing next to an incredibly obese person?Chizzang wrote: As mass changes based on its proximity to other mass
That's why girls will often have a fat friend - relative attractiveness. Or so I'm told.Chizzang wrote:GannonFan wrote:
Kind of how an overweight person looks down right skinny when standing next to an incredibly obese person?
GannonFan wrote:I can just imagine 583 years from now there'll be quite the hysteria in the lead-up to the year that that ancient sage from centuries ago, Hawking, said the world was going to end. He'll be like that future world's version of the Mayan Calendar.AZGrizFan wrote:583 years? That's very....uh....."specific"?
As for the exactness of the year, I think people are conditioned to not trust rounded numbers. You make it specific like that and people take notice.
I never read the Population Bomb. I just know that we have overcome many of the checks on our population growth. We are a species that under "natural" circumstances would have a life expectancy of something in the vicinity of 30 years. There is a limit to the population of Homo sapiens the planet can sustain. And the rate of population growth is getting very high.Ivytalk wrote:You believe that old Population Bomb bullshyt? That’s so 1968.JohnStOnge wrote:
I think just the sheer rate of population growth is a bigger issue than CO2.
And he isn't counting the mass extermination of living organisms during WWIII,WWIV, and WWV.AZGrizFan wrote:GannonFan wrote:
I can just imagine 583 years from now there'll be quite the hysteria in the lead-up to the year that that ancient sage from centuries ago, Hawking, said the world was going to end. He'll be like that future world's version of the Mayan Calendar.
As for the exactness of the year, I think people are conditioned to not trust rounded numbers. You make it specific like that and people take notice.
Actually, it's only 583 years because he picked the year 2600 (a rounded number ).
Also, I'd equate him with Nostradumbass more than the Mayan calendar....
Such a fail.Chizzang wrote:The life on earth at that time was suited for the CO2 in the atmosphere...Pwns wrote:Does he not know that during the Mesozoic era the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was 10x larger than today?
Almost nothing alive today is suited for that
66 Million years is a long time
583 isn't
God's going to need to intelligently design us faster now for that atmosphere
He can do it - we all know that... I'm counting on it
Beat me to it.kalm wrote:I give us about 5 years...
Do elaborateSeattleGriz wrote:Such a fail.Chizzang wrote:
The life on earth at that time was suited for the CO2 in the atmosphere...
Almost nothing alive today is suited for that
66 Million years is a long time
583 isn't
God's going to need to intelligently design us faster now for that atmosphere
He can do it - we all know that... I'm counting on it
I think our species could survive in atmospheric and climatological conditions such as those in the Mesozoic era. We're very adaptable. It's believed that both global CO2 levels and global temperatures were much higher then than they are now. Also much higher than what they're projected by climate scientists to be 100 years from now if we take the "business as usual" approach. It's also believed that there were large numbers of oxygen breathing land animals.Chizzang wrote:The life on earth at that time was suited for the CO2 in the atmosphere...Pwns wrote:Does he not know that during the Mesozoic era the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was 10x larger than today?
Almost nothing alive today is suited for that
66 Million years is a long time
583 isn't
God's going to need to intelligently design us faster now for that atmosphere
He can do it - we all know that... I'm counting on it
Sure,JohnStOnge wrote:I think our species could survive in atmospheric and climatological conditions such as those in the Mesozoic era. We're very adaptable. It's believed that both global CO2 levels and global temperatures were much higher then than they are now. Also much higher than what they're projected by climate scientists to be 100 years from now if we take the "business as usual" approach. It's also believed that there were large numbers of oxygen breathing land animals.Chizzang wrote:
The life on earth at that time was suited for the CO2 in the atmosphere...
Almost nothing alive today is suited for that
66 Million years is a long time
583 isn't
God's going to need to intelligently design us faster now for that atmosphere
He can do it - we all know that... I'm counting on it
Some believe rising oxygen levels contributed to our evolution (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/new ... xygen.html). But now that we exist I think we could handle somewhat lower oxygen levels such as those prevalent during parts of the Mesozoic. People live in low oxygen environments today. High altitudes, for instance.