Donna Brazille - How HRC Rigged the Nomination

[CID1990]

My only takeaway is that Donna Brazile has leaked from CNN to Hillary

and now from Hillary to CNN

so basically she sucks AND blows


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Dback and JSO have gone full retard in their denial..

They went full retard long ago

[kalm]

Yes...Trump is now off the hook...

[Rob Iola]

Clinton worked her tail off fundraising for the DNC and DEMOCRATIC candidates while Bernie was off on his own, refusing to help out Democrats.


of Course the DNC favored a DEMOCRAT.


But there is no rigging primaries (conducted by the states) or caucuses (conducted by the states/local parties).

Bottom line, Democratic Voters chose the Democrat.

Bernie, the rock star darling of the progressives, could've beaten Trump.

[bluehenbillk]

Bernie, the rock star darling of the progressives, could've beaten Trump.

you're correct he could have, but we'll never know

[kalm]

Bump!

This was agreed to back in 2015 before voters even knew who Bernie was. Hillary was literally a self anointed queen.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

[GannonFan]

Clinton worked her tail off fundraising for the DNC and DEMOCRATIC candidates while Bernie was off on his own, refusing to help out Democrats.


of Course the DNC favored a DEMOCRAT.


But there is no rigging primaries (conducted by the states) or caucuses (conducted by the states/local parties).

Bottom line, Democratic Voters chose the Democrat.

Bernie, the rock star darling of the progressives, could've beaten Trump.

He absolutely would've - the vote was clearly for the anti-status quo - people were and still are tired of politics as per normal - the whole chain from Clinton to Bush to Obama and the entitelism just pissed people off. Trump was the only candidate in the last election who offered a change to that, as detestable as he was/is. Bernie, while not an ideal candidate either, was far less detestable than Trump and would've still been a big middle finger to the political establishment. Democrats just couldn't get out of the way of their own corruption at the top to see the bigger picture. Seeing how much of a disaster the DNC was managed puts a new light on why Democrats have lost so many elections below the Presidency lately.

[Pwns]

Yup, and I laugh at the people that would say Bernie would lose because he'd be called a socialist in the campaign. That sword is now just as blunt as calling a candidate a racist.

[Ibanez]

Bump!

This was agreed to back in 2015 before voters even knew who Bernie was. Hillary was literally a self anointed queen.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

It wasn't illegal, but it wasn't ethical. Which, i'm assuming is ok by dback's response.

[Baldy]

Bernie, the rock star darling of the progressives, could've beaten Trump.

He absolutely would've - the vote was clearly for the anti-status quo - people were and still are tired of politics as per normal - the whole chain from Clinton to Bush to Obama and the entitelism just pissed people off. Trump was the only candidate in the last election who offered a change to that, as detestable as he was/is. Bernie, while not an ideal candidate either, was far less detestable than Trump and would've still been a big middle finger to the political establishment. Democrats just couldn't get out of the way of their own corruption at the top to see the bigger picture. Seeing how much of a disaster the DNC was managed puts a new light on why Democrats have lost so many elections below the Presidency lately.

Doubtful.

Bernie was the shiny new object everyone on the Donk side was enamored with. If he were the Donk nominee and his economic "plan" were to see the light of day, Trump would have won by an even larger electoral margin. Free college for all, Medicare for all, $15 hr minimum wage, a carbon tax, etc, would have been as popular as a turd in the punch bowl to the general electorate.

[Ibanez]

He absolutely would've - the vote was clearly for the anti-status quo - people were and still are tired of politics as per normal - the whole chain from Clinton to Bush to Obama and the entitelism just pissed people off. Trump was the only candidate in the last election who offered a change to that, as detestable as he was/is. Bernie, while not an ideal candidate either, was far less detestable than Trump and would've still been a big middle finger to the political establishment. Democrats just couldn't get out of the way of their own corruption at the top to see the bigger picture. Seeing how much of a disaster the DNC was managed puts a new light on why Democrats have lost so many elections below the Presidency lately.

Doubtful.

Bernie was the shiny new object everyone on the Donk side was enamored with. If he were the Donk nominee and his economic "plan" were to see the light of day, Trump would have won by an even larger electoral margin. Free college for all, Medicare for all, $15 hr minimum wage, a carbon tax, etc, would have been as popular as a turd in the punch bowl to the general electorate.

We got the Turd in the punch bowl for President.

[houndawg]

Clinton worked her tail off fundraising for the DNC and DEMOCRATIC candidates while Bernie was off on his own, refusing to help out Democrats.


of Course the DNC favored a DEMOCRAT.


But there is no rigging primaries (conducted by the states) or caucuses (conducted by the states/local parties).

Bottom line, Democratic Voters chose the Democrat.

Oh bullshit....like I told you all last year, early last year, the Democrats begged Bernie to run as a Democrat..... and now we all know why.

Yo JSO - what did I tell you about living by the rigged primary and dying by the rigged general election?

[SDHornet]

Clinton worked her tail off fundraising for the DNC and DEMOCRATIC candidates while Bernie was off on his own, refusing to help out Democrats.


of Course the DNC favored a DEMOCRAT.


But there is no rigging primaries (conducted by the states) or caucuses (conducted by the states/local parties).

Bottom line, Democratic Voters chose the Democrat.

Oh bullshit....like I told you all last year, early last year, the Democrats begged Bernie to run as a Democrat..... and now we all know why.

Yo JSO - what did I tell you about living by the rigged primary and dying by the rigged general election?

You know leftists have reached full tilt when CS leftists start eating their own. Get 'em houndy.

[grizzaholic]

Doubtful.

Bernie was the shiny new object everyone on the Donk side was enamored with. If he were the Donk nominee and his economic "plan" were to see the light of day, Trump would have won by an even larger electoral margin. Free college for all, Medicare for all, $15 hr minimum wage, a carbon tax, etc, would have been as popular as a turd in the punch bowl to the general electorate.

We got the Turd in the punch bowl for President.

As apposed to Cyanide in the punch bowl with Hillary? Are you really being seriously here and now?



Don't be a baiter.

[JohnStOnge]

I said it during the primary season and I'll say it again:

The Democratic Party Primaries were not "rigged" beyond the fact that the Democratic Party has super delegates.

Donna Brazille has responded to Trump tweeting that she said the primaries were rigged by starting a hashtag "NotwhatI said."



The DNC favored Hillary Clinton. Shocker. Hillary Clinton is a Democrat. Sanders is not. That's not the same as "rigging" the primaries.

As I said during the primaries: The only instances in which the polls showed Democratic primary voters favored one candidate but the other candidate won were instances in which the polls showed Hillary favored but Sanders won.

The Democratic primaries were not "rigged." Clinton won because more people of Democrat persuasion favored her.

[SDHornet]

JSO missing the boat again while sucking hillary cock.

Obama put the DNC in a $24M hole. DNC turned to Hillary to fundraise them out of debt in exchange for full control of the DNC and the nomination. It's really not hard to understand.

[HI54UNI]

[grizzaholic]

[grizzaholic]

ALSO: If Hi54UNI is not seen in the near future, we know who to look at

[CID1990]

To be honest, I don’t see how anything Donna Brazile says is worth the paper it is printed on.

She’s a proven partisan liar and cheat.

[Ivytalk]

To be honest, I don’t see how anything Donna Brazile says is worth the paper it is printed on.

She’s a proven partisan liar and cheat.

And lesbian.

[Chizzang]

To be honest, I don’t see how anything Donna Brazile says is worth the paper it is printed on.

She’s a proven partisan liar and cheat.

With a book deal...

[CID1990]

To be honest, I don’t see how anything Donna Brazile says is worth the paper it is printed on.

She’s a proven partisan liar and cheat.

With a book deal...

Well that's actually how you get a book deal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

What are the results of Hillary working her tail off?

She grew another tail.

[SeattleGriz]

It wasn't rigged. The DNC always got to choose who they wanted. Pointless, but not rigged.