23K
Re: 23K
25k..not bad.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: 23K
That's because the recovery was tooooooo slooooooow. What happened in 8 years should have happened in 3 years.Ibanez wrote:25k..not bad.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
Re: 23K
That rally was on the backs of American (and world) taxpayers in response to the Great Recession. That's the biggest difference. A free $2-3 trillion thrown at a problem is a pretty big help.Ibanez wrote:25k..not bad.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
Economic Stimulus Act 2008 - $152 billion
EU Stimulus 2008 - $200 billion plus 1.2% GDP per member state (avg)
American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 2009 - $831 billion
China 2010 stimulus - $586 billion
Japan stimulus acts - over $250 billion
Australia 2008/2009 stimulus - $52 billion
Is there some continued carryover a decade later? I'm sure. However, there's no denying that the market has reacted very favorably to a pro-business presidency under Trump.
JSO will tell you that the current rally is nothing different than what's been going on. That's horseshit. If you take the graph you posted and draw a line across all the peaks, you'll see a fairly decent rally that petered out in Obama's second term, and then an outlier peak at the very end that starts on election night 2016. That last peak is the Trump effect, and it bucks the trend that preceded it. And the graph doesn't even show the 25% additional rise after Trump was sworn in. Them's the facts.
Last edited by 93henfan on Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: 23K
Who says a market recovery should occur within 3 years? Adam Smith?CAA Flagship wrote:That's because the recovery was tooooooo slooooooow. What happened in 8 years should have happened in 3 years.Ibanez wrote:25k..not bad.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: 23K
No, Jim Cramer.Ibanez wrote:Who says a market recovery should occur within 3 years? Adam Smith?CAA Flagship wrote: That's because the recovery was tooooooo slooooooow. What happened in 8 years should have happened in 3 years.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Re: 23K
The Stimulus packages of the Bush/Obama administrations played a key role in stabilizing banks and markets, there's no denying that. However, you can't ignore the fact that the market DID rally under Obama (with the help of Bush era policies) and that this is a continuation of that. We're a year in with Trump so it's way too early to tell. This is all good feelings and consumer confidence (which is important.)93henfan wrote:That rally was on the backs of American (and world) taxpayers in response to the Great Recession. That's the biggest difference. A free $2-3 trillion thrown at a problem is a pretty big help.Ibanez wrote:25k..not bad.
To be honest, I don't recall any of you getting so excited when we saw the market increase so dramatically during Obama's tenure. An ~ 150% increase in the DJIA and ~160% increase in the S&P500.
Economic Stimulus Act 2008 - $152 billion
EU Stimulus 2008 - $200 billion plus 1.2% GDP per member state (avg)
American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 2009 - $831 billion
China 2010 stimulus - $586 billion
Japan stimulus acts - over $250 billion
Australia 2008/2009 stimulus - $52 billion
Is there some continued carryover a decade later? I'm sure. However, there's no denying that the market has reacted very favorably to a pro-business presidency under Trump.
JSO will tell you that the current rally is nothing different than what's been going on. That's horseshit. If you take the graph you posted and draw a line across all the peaks, you'll see a fairly decent rally that petered out in Obama's second term, and then an outlier peak at the very end that starts on election night 2016. That last peak is the Trump effect, and it bucks the trend that preceded it. Them's the facts.
I don't think we have enough information to say that Trump's 1 year in office is bucking an 8 year trend. Obama's first 3 or 4 months saw a 20% decline and then the eventual rally.
I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. It can't continue to increase like this without any correction. I imagine when/if it crashes under Trumps watch, he'll blame it on other people. That seems to be his MO.
Companies had strong earnings under Obama and Trump hasn't really done anything tangible to change that - yet. The tax bill will surely play a role once it's implemented. Right now, investors are betting big and ignoring the circus and the noise coming out of the White House. They are very optimistic.
Edit: I see your edit. Why would a graph showing the performance under Obama's administration show Trumps?
Last edited by Ibanez on Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: 23K
Buy on the dips, man.Ibanez wrote:The Stimulus packages of the Bush/Obama administrations played a key role in stabilizing banks and markets, there's no denying that. However, you can't ignore the fact that the market DID rally under Obama (with the help of Bush era policies) and that this is a continuation of that. We're a year in with Trump so it's way too early to tell. This is all good feelings and consumer confidence (which is important.)93henfan wrote:
That rally was on the backs of American (and world) taxpayers in response to the Great Recession. That's the biggest difference. A free $2-3 trillion thrown at a problem is a pretty big help.
Economic Stimulus Act 2008 - $152 billion
EU Stimulus 2008 - $200 billion plus 1.2% GDP per member state (avg)
American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 2009 - $831 billion
China 2010 stimulus - $586 billion
Japan stimulus acts - over $250 billion
Australia 2008/2009 stimulus - $52 billion
Is there some continued carryover a decade later? I'm sure. However, there's no denying that the market has reacted very favorably to a pro-business presidency under Trump.
JSO will tell you that the current rally is nothing different than what's been going on. That's horseshit. If you take the graph you posted and draw a line across all the peaks, you'll see a fairly decent rally that petered out in Obama's second term, and then an outlier peak at the very end that starts on election night 2016. That last peak is the Trump effect, and it bucks the trend that preceded it. Them's the facts.
I don't think we have enough information to say that Trump's 1 year in office is bucking an 8 year trend. Obama's first 3 or 4 months saw a 20% decline and then the eventual rally.
I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. It can't continue to increase like this without any correction. I imagine when/if it crashes under Trumps watch, he'll blame it on other people. That seems to be his MO.
Companies had strong earnings under Obama and Trump hasn't really done anything tangible to change that - yet. The tax bill will surely play a role once it's implemented. Right now, investors are betting big and ignoring the circus and the noise coming out of the White House. They are very optimistic.
Edit: I see your edit. Why would a graph showing the performance under Obama's administration show Trumps?
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Re: 23K
Hell yeah. We're in a long rally. I'm so very glad I bought a good bit of Ford around $2.50/share , Citibank for around $11/share and a few others when they were worth pocket change.Ivytalk wrote:Buy on the dips, man.Ibanez wrote:
The Stimulus packages of the Bush/Obama administrations played a key role in stabilizing banks and markets, there's no denying that. However, you can't ignore the fact that the market DID rally under Obama (with the help of Bush era policies) and that this is a continuation of that. We're a year in with Trump so it's way too early to tell. This is all good feelings and consumer confidence (which is important.)
I don't think we have enough information to say that Trump's 1 year in office is bucking an 8 year trend. Obama's first 3 or 4 months saw a 20% decline and then the eventual rally.
I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. It can't continue to increase like this without any correction. I imagine when/if it crashes under Trumps watch, he'll blame it on other people. That seems to be his MO.
Companies had strong earnings under Obama and Trump hasn't really done anything tangible to change that - yet. The tax bill will surely play a role once it's implemented. Right now, investors are betting big and ignoring the circus and the noise coming out of the White House. They are very optimistic.
Edit: I see your edit. Why would a graph showing the performance under Obama's administration show Trumps?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: 23K
Because the market moves on pro-business policy and the anticipation thereof. It started moving after election night 2016. I've only posted this about 85 times on this board. You and JSO continue to ignore it.Ibanez wrote:Why would a graph showing the performance under Obama's administration show Trumps?
The Trump rally is not a continuation of Obama's first (and half of second) term rally. Obama's rally clearly petered out in late 2014/early 2015, if you can read a graph. The market was stale for the last two years of Obama, until election night when the market did a little dance in anticipation of Trump. Then a new rally started the day after the 2016 election. And the graph doesn't even show the additional 25% added since Trump's inauguration.
It's YUGE.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: 23K
Stale? Certainly slower but stale?93henfan wrote:Because the market moves on pro-business policy and the anticipation thereof. It started moving after election night 2016. I've only posted this about 85 times on this board. You and JSO continue to ignore it.Ibanez wrote:Why would a graph showing the performance under Obama's administration show Trumps?
The Trump rally is not a continuation of Obama's first (and half of second) term rally. Obama's rally clearly petered out in late 2014/early 2015, if you can read a graph. The market was stale for the last two years of Obama, until election night when the market did a little dance in anticipation of Trump. Then a new rally started the day after the 2016 election. And the graph doesn't even show the additional 25% added since Trump's inauguration.
It's YUGE.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: 23K
Stale.Ibanez wrote:Stale? Certainly slower but stale?93henfan wrote:
Because the market moves on pro-business policy and the anticipation thereof. It started moving after election night 2016. I've only posted this about 85 times on this board. You and JSO continue to ignore it.
The Trump rally is not a continuation of Obama's first (and half of second) term rally. Obama's rally clearly petered out in late 2014/early 2015, if you can read a graph. The market was stale for the last two years of Obama, until election night when the market did a little dance in anticipation of Trump. Then a new rally started the day after the 2016 election. And the graph doesn't even show the additional 25% added since Trump's inauguration.
It's YUGE.
And moldy.
Stale and moldy.
Re: 23K
Dow Jones Industrial Average:Ibanez wrote:Stale? Certainly slower but stale?
Dec 26, 2014 - 18,053.71
Nov 4, 2016 - 17,888.28
Yep. Stale.
Conversely, in the 14 months since Hillary conceded, the market is up 6,589.94 (35.94%).
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: 23K
Stale is flat. That's actually a decline. But I see your point.93henfan wrote:Dow Jones Industrial Average:Ibanez wrote:Stale? Certainly slower but stale?
Dec 26, 2014 - 18,053.71
Nov 4, 2016 - 17,888.28
Yep. Stale.
Conversely, in the 14 months since Hillary conceded, the market is up 6,589.94 (35.94%).
I join you in your celebration of the 14 months since Hillary conceded.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: 23K
The Obama Stock Market was fueled by the Federal Reserve throwing every tool in their toolbox at the situation (as they should have, under the circumstances). The Trump Stock Market is seeing rising interest rates and no quantitative easing.
Wall Street is making gains because it sees Main Street finally freed from regulatory burdens. Dilly Dilly.
Wall Street is making gains because it sees Main Street finally freed from regulatory burdens. Dilly Dilly.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28188
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 23K
I keep seeing this. Shouldn’t it be Dilly Dally?CAA Flagship wrote:The Obama Stock Market was fueled by the Federal Reserve throwing every tool in their toolbox at the situation (as they should have, under the circumstances). The Trump Stock Market is seeing rising interest rates and no quantitative easing.
Wall Street is making gains because it sees Main Street finally freed from regulatory burdens. Dilly Dilly.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
Re: 23K
You're aware of the Bud Light commercial, no?BDKJMU wrote:I keep seeing this. Shouldn’t it be Dilly Dally?CAA Flagship wrote:The Obama Stock Market was fueled by the Federal Reserve throwing every tool in their toolbox at the situation (as they should have, under the circumstances). The Trump Stock Market is seeing rising interest rates and no quantitative easing.
Wall Street is making gains because it sees Main Street finally freed from regulatory burdens. Dilly Dilly.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28188
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 23K
No. Who the hell watches commercials nowadays? Esp Buttweiser..93henfan wrote:You're aware of the Bud Light commercial, no?BDKJMU wrote: I keep seeing this. Shouldn’t it be Dilly Dally?
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
Re: 23K
A week later...CAA Flagship wrote:25,000
25,500
A week where China said it may stop purchasing US Treasuries. That kind of news would have rattled the market years ago. The market swatted it like a gnat yesterday.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Chizzang
- Level5
- Posts: 19273
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...
Re: 23K
What could happen...?93henfan wrote:A week later...CAA Flagship wrote:25,000
25,500
A week where China said it may stop purchasing US Treasuries. That kind of news would have rattled the market years ago. The market swatted it like a gnat yesterday.
This is a cake walk
You're like Gannonfan talking about the Eagles 2 months ago...
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: 23K
Every market corrects. It’s a matter of when. Might be this year. Might not.Chizzang wrote:What could happen...?93henfan wrote:
A week later...
25,500
A week where China said it may stop purchasing US Treasuries. That kind of news would have rattled the market years ago. The market swatted it like a gnat yesterday.
This is a cake walk
You're like Gannonfan talking about the Eagles 2 months ago...
Only guarantee is that JSO will suddenly change his tune and give Trump all the credit for the market when it does correct.
As far as GF, he was right. Until Wentz blew out his ACL. That is not nearly as reliable an occurrence as a market correction.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: 23K
26,000
- Skjellyfetti
- Anal
- Posts: 14424
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian
Re: 23K
Been quiet in here. How's it going, guys?
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)