http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... =9&t=48591Skjellyfetti wrote:Been quiet in here. How's it going, guys?
A necessary market correction.
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... =9&t=48591Skjellyfetti wrote:Been quiet in here. How's it going, guys?
I had to look "SPY" up and OK that probably looks like most stock market indices would look. But, in fairness, Obama took over after a big plunge. I can remember writing at the time that Obama was in good shape because we'd just had everything go to hell shortly before he took office.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Again, you DO realize percentages don’t mean shit, yes?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Percentages don’t mean anything? Hyperbole, much?AZGrizFan wrote:Again, you DO realize percentages don’t mean shit, yes?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Percentages mean everything when it comes to the stock market. That's the whole deal. You're trying to get the best percentage return you can.AZGrizFan wrote:Again, you DO realize percentages don’t mean ****, yes?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Not sure if serious.AZGrizFan wrote: Again, you DO realize percentages don’t mean shit, yes?
John,JohnStOnge wrote:BTW, since I wrote that Obama was in good shape because everything had gone to hell shortly before he took office, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that Trump is completely full of shit when he says he inherited a mess. He inherited an economy where everything was going in the right direction and had been for some time. It actually could end up being bad for him, though, because things go in cycles. Obama legitimately COULD say he inherited a mess. So he had some wiggle room if things didn't go well right away. Also when things improved he could claim credit even if he had nothing to do with it. People that are paying attention and understand how things were going before Trump took office know that when Trump says he inherited a mess he's full of shit. When things get better people who have been paying attention know that's just a continuation. If the inevitable cyclical downturn happens when he's in office, though, he's going to have nowhere to hide. It may or may not have something to do with him. But he'll own it.
CAA Flagship wrote:John,JohnStOnge wrote:BTW, since I wrote that Obama was in good shape because everything had gone to hell shortly before he took office, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that Trump is completely full of shit when he says he inherited a mess. He inherited an economy where everything was going in the right direction and had been for some time. It actually could end up being bad for him, though, because things go in cycles. Obama legitimately COULD say he inherited a mess. So he had some wiggle room if things didn't go well right away. Also when things improved he could claim credit even if he had nothing to do with it. People that are paying attention and understand how things were going before Trump took office know that when Trump says he inherited a mess he's full of shit. When things get better people who have been paying attention know that's just a continuation. If the inevitable cyclical downturn happens when he's in office, though, he's going to have nowhere to hide. It may or may not have something to do with him. But he'll own it.
1. You do not understand "the economy".
2. See #1
Yeah. I'm the one that's confused. Let's go with that.Chizzang wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: John,
1. You do not understand "the economy".
2. See #1
John doesn't seem nearly as confused about the economy as you do...
But then again, you live in St. Louis...
one of the only major cities in North America tanking amid a boom
What's incorrect about his post?CAA Flagship wrote:John,JohnStOnge wrote:BTW, since I wrote that Obama was in good shape because everything had gone to hell shortly before he took office, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that Trump is completely full of shit when he says he inherited a mess. He inherited an economy where everything was going in the right direction and had been for some time. It actually could end up being bad for him, though, because things go in cycles. Obama legitimately COULD say he inherited a mess. So he had some wiggle room if things didn't go well right away. Also when things improved he could claim credit even if he had nothing to do with it. People that are paying attention and understand how things were going before Trump took office know that when Trump says he inherited a mess he's full of shit. When things get better people who have been paying attention know that's just a continuation. If the inevitable cyclical downturn happens when he's in office, though, he's going to have nowhere to hide. It may or may not have something to do with him. But he'll own it.
1. You do not understand "the economy".
2. See #1
Which one? There are so many.kalm wrote:What's incorrect about his post?CAA Flagship wrote: John,
1. You do not understand "the economy".
2. See #1
CAA Flagship wrote:Which one? There are so many.kalm wrote:
What's incorrect about his post?
Yup.kalm wrote:He’s Gene Stallings...Chizzang wrote:
Oh c'mon CAA. You know all of the economic trends were positive before Trump got elected. You know his claim that he inherited a mess is absurd. I mean, PLEASE. This is not a plausibly debatable proposition.CAA Flagship wrote:Yup.kalm wrote:
He’s Gene Stallings...
I will deny you the opportunity of calling me a "cherry picker".
They called the economic recovery under Obama a "jobless recovery" for one thing. I would say that the economy under Obama was OK but wasn't quite "in good shape" and there was definitely room for improvement.kalm wrote:What's incorrect about his post?CAA Flagship wrote: John,
1. You do not understand "the economy".
2. See #1
More jobs were created in 2016 than in 2017. Google it.UNI88 wrote:They called the economic recovery under Obama a "jobless recovery" for one thing. I would say that the economy under Obama was OK but wasn't quite "in good shape" and there was definitely room for improvement.kalm wrote:
What's incorrect about his post?