I am reading pieces of the report from time to time. Just for you guys who think the report affirmatively "cleared" everybody in the Trump campaign of coordinating with Russia, note that Paul Manafort provided internal polling data with a guy with connections to Russian intelligence. Here is an interesting commentary on that from the report:
Because of questions about Manafort' s credibility and our limited ability to gather evidence on what happened to the polling data after it was sent to Kilimnik, the Office could not assess what Kilimnik (or others he may have given it to) did with it. The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort' sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election, which had already been reported by U.S. media outlets at the time of the August 2 meeting.
That is way more "we couldn't tell" than it is "he didn't do anything." In other words, the polling data Manafort provided to the Russians COULD have played a roel in Russian interference. They just weren't able to find out if that was the case.
This thing where the report is being spun as having shown "no collustion" is just absolute nonsense. Again: The investigators did not acquire sufficient evidence to charge anybody with criminal conspiracy with respect to two specific Russian government election interference efforts given the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. That's not the same thing as "we found they didn't do anything wrong." Not at all.